Roles of conformational stability and colloidal stability in the aggregation of recombinant human granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Protein Science - Tập 12 Số 5 - Trang 903-913 - 2003
Eva Y.1, Sampathkumar Krishnan2, Brent S. Kendrick3, Byeong S. Chang2, John F. Carpenter4, Theodore W. Randolph1
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Center for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0242, USA
2Amgen Inc., Amgen Center, Thousand Oaks, California 91320 USA
3Amgen, Inc., Longmont, Colorado 80503, USA
4Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

We studied the non‐native aggregation of recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (rhGCSF) in solution conditions where native rhGCSF is both conformationally stable compared to its unfolded state and at concentrations well below its solubility limit. Aggregation of rhGCSF first involves the perturbation of its native structure to form a structurally expanded transition state, followed by assembly process to form an irreversible aggregate. The energy barriers of the two steps are reflected in the experimentally measured values of free energy of unfolding (ΔGunf) and osmotic second virial coefficient (B22), respectively. Under solution conditions where rhGCSF conformational stability dominates (i.e., large ΔGunf and negative B22), the first step is rate‐limiting, and increasing ΔGunf (e.g., by the addition of sucrose) decreases aggregation. In solutions where colloidal stability is high (i.e., large and positive B22 values) the second step is rate‐limiting, and solution conditions (e.g., low pH and low ionic strength) that increase repulsive interactions between protein molecules are effective at reducing aggregation. rhGCSF aggregation is thus controlled by both conformational stability and colloidal stability, and depending on the solution conditions, either could be rate‐limiting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Atkins P., 1994, Physical chemistry, 1031

B.I. Corporation, 1993, Instrument manual for BI‐ZP software, version 4.0 & higher and BI‐9025AT & BI‐2025AT signal processors, version 1.1.b

10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<123::AID-PROT140>3.0.CO;2-Q

10.1006/abbi.2000.2054

10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77424-2

10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00002-9

10.1107/S0907444994001216

10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76052-X

10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00842-2

10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00831-8

10.1021/jp984035l

10.1201/9781315274287

10.1073/pnas.90.11.5167

Israelachvili J., 1992, Intermolecular and surface forces, 450

10.1038/379219a0

10.1073/pnas.94.22.11917

10.1073/pnas.95.24.14142

10.1006/abio.2001.5411

10.1074/jbc.M007766200

10.1111/j.1399-3011.1997.tb01472.x

10.1021/bi012006m

10.1110/ps.4700102

Lehninger A.L., 1993, Principles of biochemistry

10.1006/abbi.1998.1022

10.1023/A:1015929109894

McQuarrie D.A., 1976, Statistical mechanics, 641

10.1007/BF01025250

10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77691-X

10.1016/0076-6879(86)31045-0

10.1016/0167-7799(90)90146-O

10.1002/1097-0134(2000)41:4 <1::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-2

10.1016/0021-9797(92)90424-K

10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76753-1

10.1006/jmbi.2000.3851

10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.150

10.1063/1.480328

10.1006/jmbi.2001.4845

Sousa R., 1995, Use of glycerol, polyols, and other protein structure stabilizing agents in protein crystallization, Acta Crystallogr., 51, 271

10.1063/1.1467343

10.1107/S0907444902012775

Timasheff S.N., 1992, Stability of protein pharmaceuticals, part B: In vivo pathways of degradation and strategies for protein stabilization, 265

10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77713-6

10.1073/pnas.131194798