Role of anomalous data and epistemological beliefs in middle school students’ theory change about two controversial topics
Tóm tắt
The question of theory change is crucial in knowledge construction, particularly in the process of conceptual change. This study was designed to investigate two factors that, in addition to initial theory preference, may play a crucial role in the process of theory change, that is, students’ interpretation of anomalous data on two controversial topics (the dinosaur extinction and the construction of the Giza pyramids in Egypt) and their epistemological beliefs about the nature of knowledge. Canonical correlation analyses suggested for both topics an association, stronger for the dinosaur extinction topic, between (a) acceptance of anomalous data (rated both as valid and inconsistent with the held theory), initial theory preference, epistemological belief in Certain Knowledge and (b) theory change. Data obtained from structure coefficients in canonical correlation analyses indicate that acceptance of anomalous data significantly contributed the most to theory change whereas the epistemological belief contributed the least. Finally, educational implications are drawn.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change.Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.
Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery science. In R.N. Giere (Ed.),Cognitive models of science (pp. 129–186). Minnesota studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts.Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1993a). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education.Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.
Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1993b).Theory change in response to contradictory information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1998). An empirical text of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 623–654.
diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P.B. Pufall (Eds.),Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Greeno, J. (1989). A perspective on thinking.American Psychologist, 44, 134–141.
Jehng, J.J., Johnson, S.D., & Anderson, R.C. (1993). Schooling and student’s epistemological beliefs about learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35.
Kardash, C.M., & Scholes, R.J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271.
Kitchener, K.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition.Human Development, 26, 222–232.
Kitchener, K.S., & King, P.M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116.
Kitchener, K.S., King, P.M., & Wood, P.K., Davison, M.L. (1989). Sequentiality and consistency in the development of reflective judgment: A six-year longitudinal study.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 73–95.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Limón, M. (in press). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. In L. Mason (Ed.), Instructional practices for conceptual change in science domains [Special issue].Learning and Instruction.
Limón, M., & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: A case study in the domain of the natural sciences. In S. Vosniadou & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Advances in conceptual change research [Special issue].European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 213–230.
Mason, L. (1998). Le credenze epistemologiche degli studenti. Uno studio con studenti di scuola superiore [Students’ epistemological beliefs A study with high school students]. In B. Vertecchi & N. Paparella (Eds.),La ricerca didattica per la riforma della scuola (pp. 143–165). Proceedings of the 2nd National SIRD Conference. Naples, Italy: Tecnodid (in Italian).
Mason, L. (in press). Responses to anomalous data on controversial topics and theory change. A qualitative analysis.Learning and Instruction.
Perry, W.G. Jr. (1968).Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a Liberal Arts College: A validation of a scheme. Cambridge, MA: Bureau of Study Counsel, Harvard University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 024315).
Qian, G., & Alverman, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282–292.
Ryan, M.P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 248–258.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411.
Schommer, M., Rhodes, N., & Crouse, A. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 433–443.
Smith, C.L., Houghton, C., Maclin, D., & Hennessey, M.G. (1997).Understanding 6th graders’ epistemologies of science: Teasing apart the effects of schooling and development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Songer, N.B., & Linn, M. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761–784.
Thagard, P. (1992).Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vosniadou, S (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change.Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
Vosniadou, S. (2000). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.),New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3–13). Amsterdam: Pergamon.