Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander P.A., 2007, Re‐framing the problem of conceptual change in learning and Instruction, 221
Andre T., 2003, Intentional conceptual change, 173
Bell P., 2002, CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation, 449
Bendixen, L.D. and Schraw, G. Why do epistemic beliefs affect ill‐defined problem solving?Epistemic beliefs and learning: What do we know and how do we know it?Symposium presented at the AERA Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA. Edited by: Bendixen (Chair), L.D.
Eemeren F.H. van, 1992, Argumentation, communication, and fallacies
Johnson R.H., 2002, Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument
Nussbaum, E.M. and Jacobson, T.E.Reasons that students avoid intellectual arguments. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Honolulu, HI. July.
O’Keefe D.J., 1982, Advances in argumentation theory and research, 3
Perry W.G., 1970, Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme
Petty R.E., 1999, Dual‐process theories in social psychology, 41
Pintrich P.R., 2003, Intentional conceptual change, 1
Rabash J., 2000, A user’s guide to MLwiN
Sinatra, G.M. Learning about biological evolution involves epistemic change.The Generality‐Specificity Issue on Conceptual Change: Influence of domain Epistemology in Conceptual Change Research.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Padova, Italy. Edited by: Mason (Chair), L.
Songer N.B., 1992, Scope, sequence and coordination of secondary school science, Volume II: Relevant research, 197
Stathopoulou C., 2007, Re‐framing the problem of conceptual change in learning and instruction, 145
Toulmin S., 1958, The uses of argument
Yeh S.S., 1998, Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 49