Risk information source preferences in construction workers

Employee Relations - Tập 36 Số 1 - Trang 70-81 - 2013
Calvin Burns1, Stacey M. Conchie2
1Work, Employment And Organisation
2LANCASTER UNIVERSITY,

Tóm tắt

Purpose – Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking/unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source's expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered). Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, safety manager, project manager, supervisor, workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (asbestos, back pain, site transport, heights, slips/trips, housekeeping, and site-specific and job-specific risks). Findings – The paper found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise. Practical implications – The findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations. Originality/value – To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aronsson, G. (1999), “Contingent workers and health and safety”, Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 439-459.

Burns, C. , Mearns, K. and McGeorge, P. (2006), “Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, pp. 1139-1150.

Burt, C. , Chmiel, N. and Hayes, P. (2008), “Implications of turnover and trust for safety attitudes and behaviour in work teams”, Safety Science, Vol. 47, pp. 1002-1006.

Conchie, S.M. and Burns, C. (2009), “Improving occupational safety: using a trusted information source to communicate about risk”, Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 13-25.

Conchie, S.M. , Donald, I.J. and Taylor, P.J. (2006), “Trust: missing piece(s) in the safety puzzle”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, pp. 1097-1104.

Cox, S. and Cox, T. (1991), “The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example”, Work and Stress, Vol. 5, pp. 93-106.

Dingsdag, D.P. , Biggs, H.C. and Sheahan, V.L. (2008), “Understanding and defining OH&S competency for construction site positions: worker perceptions”, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 619-633.

Duijne, F.H. , Aken, D.V. and Schouten, E.G. (2008), “Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment”, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 245-254.

Dwyer, T. (1991), Life and Death at Work: Industrial Accidents as a Case of Socially Produced Error, Plenum, New York, NY.

Eakins, J. (1992), “Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspectives on the management of health and safety in small workplaces”, International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 22, pp. 689-704.

Engel, J.F. , Blackwell, R.D. and Miniard, P.W. (1999), Consumer Behaviour, 5th ed., Dryden Press, Chicago, IL.

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2013a), “Construction”, available at: http://osha.europa.eu/en/sector/construction (accessed 1 March 2013).

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2013b), “Tackling major hazards and risks”, available at: http://osha.europa.eu/en/sector/construction/index_html/hazards_risks (accessed 1 March 2013).

Frewer, L.J. , Howard, C. , Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R. (1996), “What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 16, pp. 473-485.

Greenacre, M.J. (1993), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, Academic Press, London.

Hawkins, D.I. , Best, R.J. and Coney, K.A. (1998), Consumer Behaviour: Implications for Marketing Strategy, 7th ed., Irwin Inc, Chicago, IL.

Hayes, B.E. , Perander, J. , Smecko, T. and Trask, J. (1998), “Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: development and validation of the work safety scale”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 29, pp. 145-161.

Helmreich, R.L. and Merritt, A.C. (1998), Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Holmes, N. and Gifford, S.M. (1997), “Narratives of risk in occupational health and safety: why the ‘good’ boss blames his tradesmen and the ‘good’ tradesman blames his tools”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 21, pp. 11-19.

Johnson, J.D. (1996), Information Seeking: An Organizational Dilemma, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.

Jungermann, H. , Pfister, H.R. and Fischer, K. (1996), “Credibility, information preferences and information interests”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 16, pp. 251-261.

Lehto, M.R. and Foley, J.P. (1991), “Risk-taking, warning labels, training, and regulation: are they associated with the use of helmets by all terrain vehicle riders?”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 22, pp. 191-200.

Lingard, H. and Rowlinson, S. (2005), Occupational Health and Safety in Construction Project Management, Spon Press, New York, NY.

Liu, S. , Huang, J. and Brown, G.L. (1998), “Information and risk perception: a dynamic adjustment process”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 18, pp. 689-699.

Mayer, R.C. , Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995), “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 709-734.

Mearns, K. and Reader, T. (2008), “Organizational support and safety outcomes: an un-investigated relationship?”, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 388-397.

Mearns, K. and Yule, S. (2009), “The role of national culture in determining safety performance: challenges for the global oil and gas industry”, Safety Science, Vol. 47, pp. 777-785.

Meliá, J.L. , Mearns, K. , Silva, S.A. and Lima, L. (2008), “Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry”, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 949-958.

Powell, C. (2007), “The perception of risk and risk taking behavior: implications for incident prevention strategies”, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 18, pp. 10-15.

Rousseau, D.M. , Sitkin, S.B. , Burt, R.S. and Camerer, C. (1998), “Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 393-404.

Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Savolainen, R. (2008), Everyday Information Practices: A Social Phenomenological Perspective, The Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD.

Seo, D.C. , Torabi, M.R. , Blair, E.H. and Ellis, N.T. (2004), “A cross validation of safety climate scale using confirmatory factor analytic approach”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 35, pp. 427-445.

Sinclair, A. , Hill, D. and Tyers, C. (2008), Irish and Non-Irish National Construction Workers: Research on Differences in Approach to Health and Safety at Work, Health and Safety Authority.

Smith, V.K. and Johnson, F.R. (1988), “How do risk perceptions respond to information? The case of radon”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, pp. 1-8.

Spangenberg, S. , Baarts, C. , Dyreborg, J. , Jensen, L. , Kines, P. and Mikkelsen, K.L. (2003), “Factors contributing to the difference in work related injury rates between Danish and Swedish construction workers”, Safety Science, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 517-530.

UK Health and Safety Executive (2013a), “Health and safety in the construction industry”, available at: www.hse.gov.uk/construction/index.htm (accessed 1 March 2013).

UK Health and Safety Executive (2013b), “The high 5”, available at: www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg384.pdf (accessed 1 March 2013).

US Department of Labor and Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013), “Census of fatal occupational injuries summary, 2011”, available at: www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.nr0.htm (accessed 1 March 2013).

Viscusi, W.K. and O'Connor, C.J. (1984), “Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: are workers Bayesian decision makers?”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp. 942-956.

Warner, E.S. , Murray, A.D. and Palmour, V.E. (1973), Information Needs of Urban Residents, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Division of Library Programs, Washington, DC.

Wright, P. , Creighton, P. and Threlsall, S.M. (1982), “Some factors determining when instructions will be read”, Ergonomics, Vol. 25, pp. 225-237.

Zohar, D. and Luria, G. (2004), “Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 322-333.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Employee Relations

Tập 36 Số 1

70-81

Thông tin tác giả