Risk factors and implications of oral mucositis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

European Journal of Haematology - Tập 103 Số 4 - Trang 402-409 - 2019
Roni Shouval1,2, Elizaveta Kouniavski2, Joshua Fein2, Ivetta Danylesko2, Noga Shem‐Tov2, Mika Geva2, Ronit Yerushalmi2, Avichai Shimoni2, Arnon Nagler2
1Dr. Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
2Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundOral mucositis (OM) is a common toxicity of stem cell transplantation (SCT). We sought to evaluate OM burden, risk factors, and implications in a cohort of allogeneic‐SCT recipients.MethodsThis was a single‐center study including 115 adult allogeneic‐SCT transplanted between 2016 and 2018 for various hematological conditions. Conditioning intensity was categorized as myeloablative (MAC, 39%), reduced intensity (34%), or reduced toxicity (RTC, 27%) in patients conditioned with fludarabine‐treosulfan. OM was prospectively graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v.4.0) system.ResultsModerate‐to‐severe OM (grade 2‐4) was experienced by 60% of patients. In a univariate analysis, younger age (P = .023), lower body mass index (P = .01), recent smoking (P = .08), recent antibiotics exposure (P = .018), MAC (P < .001), and methotrexate (P = .009) were associated with moderate‐to‐severe OM. In a multivariable logistic regression model, conditioning and graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis remained significant. OM risk was lowest with RTC (RTC vs MAC: odd ratio [OR] 0.05, P < .001), and recent antibiotic exposure trended toward increased risk (OR 1.88, P = .168). OM was associated with longer hospitalization, delayed neutrophil engraftment, and gastrointestinal‐related infections.ConclusionOral mucositis remains a leading SCT complication. Treosulfan‐based conditioning has low mucosal toxicity and is appealing given previous reports on its high efficacy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12374452

10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70349-2

10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.014

10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.02.006

10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02342.x

10.1002/cncr.28592

10.1007/s00277-008-0508-6

10.1038/bmt.2009.66

10.1038/sj.bmt.1704637

10.1182/blood.V99.3.731

10.1007/s00520-009-0586-6

10.1002/cncr.20162

10.1007/s00520-006-0176-9

10.1007/s00520-014-2190-7

10.1200/JCO.2004.05.147

10.1002/cncr.23898

10.1097/CCO.0000000000000180

10.1038/sj.bmt.1702447

10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2201

10.1056/NEJMoa1004383

10.1182/blood-2002-11-3615

10.1038/sj.bmt.1705259

10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.776

10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004

10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004

10.1002/ajh.24631

10.1038/bmt.2015.174

10.1182/blood-2014-02-514778

Riley P, 2017, Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and growth factors, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, CD011990

10.1056/NEJMoa040125

Clarkson JE, 2010, Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment, Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, CD001973

10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.02.002

10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.023

10.1126/science.1223813

10.1126/science.1223490

10.1038/nrc1318

10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.36

10.6004/jnccn.2008.2001

10.1038/sj.bmt.1704647

10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.026