Revisiting the issue of enforceability of mediation agreements in Hong Kong
Tóm tắt
Currently, there is no statutory framework governing the enforceability of mediation agreements and case law on this matter has been inconsistent. While the traditional reluctance to enforce mediation agreements still prevails, judges and commentators are increasingly acknowledging the fact that mediation agreements are enforceable if the terms of the agreements are certain. This issue is particularly relevant considering the rapid development of mediation in Hong Kong and the introduction of the forthcoming Mediation Ordinance. This paper suggests that at the current stage, it is not appropriate to impose statutory provisions on this issue which should be a matter for judges to decide based on the facts of each case, applying contract law principles. This paper will also consider the Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong and discuss the possible effects of the reform with particular focus on the enforceability of mediation agreements.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander N (2010) Mediation: process and practice in Hong Kong. LexisNexis, Hong Kong
Berger KP (2006) Law and practice of escalation clauses. Arbitr Int 22(1):1–18
Carrel A (2003) An ADR clause by any other name might smell as sweet: England’s High Court of Justice Queens Bench attempts and fails to define what is not an enforceable ADR clause. J Disput Resolut 2:547–564
Carroll R (2002) Trends in Mediation Legislation: ‘All for One and One for All’ or ‘One at All’? Western Australian Law Review 30(2):167–207
Chen AHY (2003) Mediation, Litigation, and Justice: Confucian Reflections in a Modern Liberal Society. In: Bell DA, Chaibong H (eds) Confucianism for the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 257–287
Cheong LK (2004) Agreements to mediate: the impact of cable & wireless plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2003] BLR89. Singap Acad Law J 16:530–540
Cheong LK (2008) A persisting aberration: the movement to enforce agreements to mediate. Singap Acad Law J 20:195–216
Clarke AMR (2008) The future of civil arbitration. Arbitration 74:419–423
Coben J, Thompson PN (2006) Disputing Irony: a systematic look at litigation about mediation. Harv Negot Law Rev 12:43–146
Coleman A (2003) ADR: an irreversible tide? Arbitr Int 19(3):303–311
Hilmer SE (2010) Mediation theory and practice in Hong Kong. LexisNexis, Hong Kong
Jones D (2009) Dealing with multi-tiered dispute resolution process. Int J Arbitr Mediat Disput Manage 75(2):188–198
Katz L (1988) Enforcing an ADR clause—are good intentions all you have? Am Bus Law J 26(3):575–603
Katz L (2008) Getting to the Table, Kicking and Screaming: Drafting an Enforceable Mediation Provision. Altern High Cost Litig 26(10):183–186
Kayali D (2010) Enforceability of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses. J Int Arbitr 27(6):551–577
Lande J (2008) The movement toward early case handling in courts and private dispute resolution. Ohio State J Disput Resolut 24(1):81–130
Lee J (1999) The enforceability of mediation clauses in Singapore. Singap J Legal Stud (July):229–247
Lee J (2001) Mediation clauses at the crossroads. Singap J Legal Stud 2001:81–101
Lee J (2003) ADR Clauses and Enforcement: Cable & Wireless v IBM UK. L.M.C.L.Q 2:164–168
Lee J (2007) Mediation clauses: an eagle finding its wings. Juris Illumin 4(1):3
Leung R (2009) Future development of mediation. In: Leung R (ed) Hong Kong mediation handbook. Sweet & Maxwell, Hong Kong, Chapter 16
Mackie K (2003) The future for ADR clauses after cable & wireless v IBM. Arbitr Int 19(3):345–362
Meggitt G (2008) Civil justice reform in Hong Kong—its progress and its future. Hong Kong Law J 38(1):89–128
Newmark C (2003) English courts voice strong ADR support. Altern High Cost Litig 21(1):3–4
O’Connor J (2010) The enforceability of agreements to negotiate in good faith. Univ Tasman Law Rev 29(2):177–198
Parker BR (1992) What can be done to enforce mediation agreements? Def Counsel J 59:322–339
Pryles M (2001) Multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses. J Int Arbitr 18(2):159–176
Rajah I (2006) The case for a simple dispute resolution clause. Singap Arbitr 1:2–3
Schmitz AJ (2004) Refreshing contractual analysis of ADR agreements by curing bipolar avoidance of modern common law. Harv Negot Law Rev 9:1–74
Schmitz AJ (2006) Confronting ADR agreements’ contract/no-contract conundrum with good faith. DePaul Law Rev 56:55–106
Starr P, Ma L (2009) The legal implications of mediation. In: Raymond Leung (ed) Hong Kong mediation handbook. Sweet & Maxwell, Hong Kong, Chapter 10
Suter E (2008) Discussion required? Part two. New Law J 158:1562–1563
Suter E (2009) The progress from void to valid for agreements to mediate. Arbitration 75:28–37
Tochtermann P (2008) Agreements to negotiate in the transnational context—issues of contract law and effective dispute resolution. Unif Law Rev 13:685–708
Wilson SP, McLean DJ (2008) Compelling mediation in the context of med-arb agreements. Disput Resolut J 63(3):28–34
Wolski B (2003) New rules to facilitate the use of ADR in resolving international commercial disputes. ADR Bull 5(9):1–9