Revisiting purchasing power parity in G6 countries: an application of smooth time-varying cointegration approach
Tóm tắt
This study revisits purchasing power parity (PPP) for the G6 countries (i.e., Canada, Italy, Japan, France, Germany, the UK) using smooth time-varying cointegrating approach, proposed by Park and Hahn (Econom Theory 15:664–703, 1999). Using monthly data over the 1971M1–2013M12 period, our empirical results indicate that PPP holds in two out of six countries (i.e., France and Germany).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Apergis N (1998) Budget deficits and exchange rates: further evidence from cintegration and causality tests. J Econ Stud 25:161–178
Arize AC, Malindretos J, Christoffersen S (2002) Monetary dynamics, exchange rates and parameter instability: an empirical investigation. J Econ Stud 30:493–513
Baffoe-Bonnie J (2004) Dynamic modelling of faiscal and exchange rates policy effects in a developing country: a non-structural approach. J Econ Stud 31:57–75
Bahmani-Oskooee M (1992) Time series approach to test the productivity bias hypothesis in purchasing power parity. Kyklos 45:227–236
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty S (2009) Purchasing power parity in less-developed and transition economies: a review article. J Econ Surv 23:617–658
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Nasir ABM (2005) Productivity bias hypothesis and the PPP: a review article. Journal of Economic Surveys 19:671–696
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Niroomand F (1996) A Re-examination of the Balassa’s productivity bias hypothesis. Econ Dev Cult Change 45:195–204
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kutan AM, Zhou S (2008) Do real exchange rates follow a non-linear mean reverting process in developing countries? South Econ J 74:1049–1062
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Chang TC, Lee K-C (2014) Purchasing power parity in the RBICS and in the MIST countries: sequential panel selection method. Rev Econ Finance 1:1–12
Balke NS, Fomby TB (1997) Threshold cointegration. Int Econ Rev 38:627–645
Beach ED, Kruse NC, Uri ND (1993) The doctrine of relative purchasing power parity re-examined. J Econ Stud 20:3–23
Belek A, Beckmann J, Czudaj R (2015) Productivity shocks and real effective exchange rates. Rev Dev Econ 19(3):502–515
Belke A, Beckmann J, KÜhl M (2011a) The stability of the dollar-euro exchange rate determination equation—a time-varying coefficient approach. Rev World Econ 147(1):11–40
Belke A, Beckmann J, KÜhl M (2011b) Cointegration, structural breaks and monetary fundamentals of the dollar/yen exchange rate. Int Adv Econ Res 17(4):397–412
Belke A, Beckmann J, Dobnik F (2012) Cross-section dependence and the monetary exchange rate model—a panel analysis. N Am J Econ 23(1):38–53
Bleaney M (1992) Does long-run purchasing-power parity hold within the european monetary system? J Econ Stud 19:66–72
Carrion-I-Silvestre JI, Del Barrio T, Lopez-Bazo E (2004) Evidence on the purchasing power parity in a panel of cities. Appl Econ 36:961–966
Chang, Y., & Martinez-Chombo, E. (2003). Electricity demand analysis using cointegration and error-correction models with time varying parameters: the Mexican case. Working paper, Department of Economics, Rice University
Chang T, Liu W-C, Yu C-P (2010) Revisiting purchasing power for G-7 countries: further evidence based on panel SURKSS tests. Appl Econ Lett 17:1383–1387
Chang T, Lee C-H, Chou P-I, Tang D-P (2011) Revisiting long run purchasing power parity with asymmetric adjustment for G-7 countries. Japan and the World Economy 23:259–264
Chiang I-C, Chan T, Cheng S-C, Wu T-P (2013) Purchasing power parity hold in G8 countries? A new test. Empir Econ Lett 12(10):1077–1084
Hojman DE (1989) Fundamental equilibrium exchange rates under contractionary devaluation: a peruvian model. J Econ Stud 16:5–26
Holmes MJ (2002) Exchange rate regimes and economic convergence in the European union. J Econ Stud 29:6–20
Horne J (2004) Eight conjectures about exchange rates. J Econ Stud 31:524–548
Jung C (1995) Forecasting of foreign exchange rate by normal mixture models. J Econ Stud 22:45–57
Kim HG, Jei SY (2013) Empirical test for purchasing power parity using a time-varying parameter model: Japan and Korea cases. Appl Econ Lett 20:525–529
Kim B-H, Kim H-K, Oh K-Y (2009) The purchasing power parity of Southeast Asian currencies: a time-varying coefficient approach. Econ Model 26(1):96–106
Marcela S, Gadea MD, Serrano JM (2003) PPP and structural breaks: the peseta-sterling rate, 50 years of floating regime. J Int Money Finance 22:613–627
Moosa IA (1994) Testing proportionality, symmetry and exclusiveness in long-run PPP. J Econ Stud 21:3–21
Narayan PK (2006) Are bilateral real exchange rates stationary? Evidence from lagrange multiplier unit root tests for India. Appl Econ 38:63–70
Park JY (1992) Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica 60:119–143
Park JY, Hahn SB (1999) Cointegrating regression with time varying coefficients. Econom Theory 15:664–703
Sjolander P (2007) Unreal exchange rates: a simulation based approach to adjust misleading PPP estimates. J Econ Stud 34:256–288
Taylor MP, Peel DA (2000) Nonlinear adjustment, long-run equilibrium and exchange rate fundamentals. J Int Money Finance 19(1):33–53
Zuo H, Park SY (2011) Money demand in China and time-varying cointegration. China Econ Rev 22:330–343