Retrieval of chromophore concentration in a tissue phantom by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

Optics and Spectroscopy - Tập 117 - Trang 663-669 - 2014
A. Sircan-Kucuksayan1, M. Canpolat1
1Biomedical Optics Research Unit, Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

Tóm tắt

This study describes a method for analysis of back reflectance spectroscopic data to estimate the concentration of endogenous or exogenous chromophores of tissue, noninvasively and in real time. In the study, tissue phantoms were prepared using intralipid and two chromophores, indocyanine green and methylene blue. Reduced scattering and absorption coefficients ranges of tissue phantoms were kept in the range of biological tissues. Spectroscopic measurements on the tissue phantoms were carried out using a miniature spectrometer, an optical fiber probe, a halogen tungsten light source and a laptop. Monte Carlo simulations of the experiments were run, and an average optical path lengths of the detected photons were obtained for different absorption and scattering coefficients. The average optical path lengths of the photons were used to estimate concentrations of the chromophores in the tissue phantoms. Scattering and absorption coefficients were estimated with an average error of 4.7 and 5.4%, respectively. The developed method has the potential to be used in diagnosis of pathologic tissues based on the variation of biochemical composition of tissues and in photodynamic therapy to estimate the concentration of photosensitizers.

Tài liệu tham khảo

D. S. Gareau et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 0612 (2010). D. Gareau, J. Hunter, and S. Jacques, Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Diagnostic Systems Viii. 7555 (2010). A. Amelink et al., Oral Oncology 47, 1165 (2011). R. Nachabe et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 087010 (2011). M. B. Ericson et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 10, 034009 (2005). T. Smits et al., J. Investig. Dermat. 125, 833 (2005). J. M. Olmedo et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermat. 55, 408 (2006). J. Strasswimmer et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 292 (2004). S. Fendel and B. Schrader, Fresenius J. Analyt. Chem. 360, 609 (1998). M. Gniadecka et al., J. Investig. Dermat. 122, 443 (2004). J. M. O’Amar, R. D. Ley, and I. J. Bigio, J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 1320 (2004). M. Canpolat et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 054021 (2009). M. Canpolat et al., Dermatol. Surg. 38, 215 (2012). P. Thueler et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 8, 495 (2003). J. R. Mourant et al., Appl. Opt. 36, 5655 (1997). S. A. H. J. de Visscher et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 067001 (2012). H. W. Wang et al., Opt. Expess 17, 2805 (2009). N. Subhash et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 014018 (2006). M. S. Patterson, B. Chance, and B. C. Wilson, Appl. Opt. 28, 2331 (1989). A. Pifferi et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 78, 053103 (2007). M. S. Patterson et al., Appl. Opt. 30, 4474 (1991). S. Andree et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 067009 (2010). Y. Yang et al., J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 090504 (2011). M. G. Nichols, E. L. Hull, and T. H. Foster, Appl. Opt. 36, 93 (1997). H. J. van Staveren et al., Appl. Opt. 30, 4507 (1991). S. T. Flock et al., Las. Surg. Med. 12, 510 (1992). M. L. J. Landsman et al., J. Appl. Physiol. 40, 575 (1976). M. Canpolat and J. R. Mourant, Appl. Opt. 40, 3792 (2001). R. Reif, O. A’Amar, and I. J. Bigio, Appl. Opt. 46, 7317 (2007). A. Kim et al., Opt. Expess 18, 5580 (2010). B. Yu, H. L. Fu, and N. Ramanujam, J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 011010 (2011).