Rethinking teacher evaluation using human, social, and material capital

Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 258–267. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago [u.a.]: University of Chicago Press. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–58). Westport, CT: Greenwood. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Buck, S., & Greene, J. (2011, February 24). In the United States merit pay plans for teachers are few and far between. Education Next. Cherasaro, T. L., Brodersen, R. M., Reale, M. L., & Yanoski, D. C. (2016). Teachers’ responses to feedback from evaluators: What feedback characteristics matter? REL 2017-190. Naperville: Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080. Cohen, J., Schuldt, L. C., Brown, L., & Grossman, P. (2016). Leveraging observation tools for instructional improvement: Exploring variability in uptake of ambitious instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–36. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and institutions: Sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure), S120. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Curtis, R. (2011). District of columbia public schools: Defining instructional expectations and aligning accountability and support. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Curtis, R. (2012a). Putting the pieces in place: Charlotte-mecklenburg public schools’ teacher evaluation system. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Curtis, R. (2012b). Building it together: The design and implementation of Hillsborough County Public Schools’ teacher evaluation system. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Daly, A. J. (Ed.). (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328. Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7. Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011. Derrington, M. L. (2016). Implementing teacher evaluation: Lattice of leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116658689. Donahue, E. (2014). Teacher perceptions of the impact of an evaluation system on classroom instructional practices Retrieved from Proquest ISBN 9781321659108. Donahue, E., & Vogel, L. R. (2016). Teacher perceptions of the impact of teacher evaluation on classroom instructional practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (pp. 1–34). Donaldson, M. L. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on evaluation reform. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Donaldson, M. L. (2013). Principals’ approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating, and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 838–882. Donaldson, M. L., Cobb, C. D., LeChasseur, K., Gabriel, R., Gonzalez, R., Woulfin, S., et al. (2014). An evaluation of the pilot implementation of Connecticut’s system for educator evaluation and development. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Center for Education Policy Analysis. Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). New York: Routledge. Donaldson, M. L., & Woulfin, S. (2018). From tinkering to going “rogue”: How principals use agency when enacting new teacher evaluation systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 531–556. Donaldson, M. L., Woulfin, S., LeChasseur, K., & Cobb, C. D. (2016). The structure and substance of teachers’ opportunities to learn about teacher evaluation reform: Promise or pitfall for equity? Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(2), 183–201. Finfgeld-Connett, D., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 194–204. Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 100–107. Firestone, W., & Donaldson, M. L. (2019). Teacher evaluation as high stakes data use: What recent research suggests. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability., 31(3), 289–314. Firestone, W. A., Blitz, C. L., Gitomer, D. H., Gradinarova-Kirova, D., Shcherbakov, A., & Nordin, T. L. (2013). Year 1 report: New Jersey teacher evaluation pilot program. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education. Firestone, W. A., Nordin, T. L., Shcherbakov, A., Kirova, D., & Blitz, C. L. (2014). Pilot teacher evaluation program: Year 2 final report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education. Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431. Ford, T. G. (2018). Pointing teachers in the wrong direction: Understanding Louisiana elementary teachers’ use of Compass high-stakes teacher evaluation data. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 251–283. Ford, T., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 1–47. Goldhaber, D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 87–95. Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., et al. (2015). Make room for value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 96–104. Goldstein, J. (2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 3, 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/512741. Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5. Hallinger, P., Piyaman, P., & Viseshsiri, P. (2017). Assessing the effects of learning-centered leadership on teacher professional learning in Thailand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.008. Halverson, R. R., & Clifford, M. A. (2006). Evaluation in the wild: A distributed cognition perspective on teacher assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 578–619. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204. Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., Pankake, A. M., & Olivier, D. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9060-8. Ingersoll, R. M., & Collins, G. J. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205142. Israel, M., Kamman, M. L., McCray, E. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (2014). Mentoring in action: The interplay among professional assistance, emotional support, and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 45–63. Jennings, J. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–23. Jiang, J. Y., Sporte, S. E., & Luppescu, S. (2015). Teachers’ perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago’s REACH students. Educational Resarcher, 44(2), 105–116. Johnson, S. M., & Fiarman, S. E. (2012). The potential of peer review. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 20–25. Kaufmann, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002). “ Lost At Sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273–300. Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800. Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753. Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1), n1. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. (2017). Teacher evaluation in Illinois: School leaders’ perceptions and practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 179–209. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48. Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., Strunk, K. O., Lincove, J. A., & Huguet, A. (2017). Evaluating teachers in the big easy: How organizational context shapes policy responses in new orleans. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 39(4), 539–570. McCullough, M., English, B., Angus, M. H., & Gill, B. (2015). Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Implementation experiences of early-adopting districts (REL 2015-093). Naperville: Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Meyer, J. H., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. Munger, M. S. (2012). Shared responsibility for teacher quality: How do principals respond to peer assistance and review? Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Nelson, B. S. (2010). How elementary school principals with different leadership content knowledge profiles support teachers’ mathematics instruction. New England Mathematics Journal, 42, 43–53. Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700. Noblit, G., & Hare, D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. OECD. (2013a). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD. (2013b). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. Organisation for Economic Coordination and Development. (2019). Education at a glance 2019. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/teachers/teachinghours.htm . Papay, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2012). Is PAR a good investment? Understanding the costs and benefits of teacher peer assistance and review programs. Educational Policy, 26(5), 696–729. Reinhorn, S. K., Johnson, S. M., & Simon, N. S. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383–406. Rigby, J. G. (2015). Principals’ sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 374–392. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. Ruffini, S. J., Makkonen, R., Tejwani, J., & Diaz, M. (2014). Principal and teacher perceptions of implementation of multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems in Arizona. REL 2015-062. San Francisco: Regional Educational Laboratory West. Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S. R., & Brown, E. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-teacher conferences, and district implementation. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Sebastian, J., Camburn, E. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17720978. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22. Slotnik, W. J., Bugler, D., & Liang, G. (2014). Real progress in Maryland: Student learning objectives and teacher and principal evaluation. Washington, DC.: Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center at WestEd. Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203. Spillane, J. P., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1–17. Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2015). Intra- and interschool interactions about instruction: Exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1086/683292. Sporte, S. E., Stevens, W. D., Healey, K., Jiang, J., Hart, H., & University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago, School Research. (2013). Teacher evaluation in practice: Implementing Chicago’s REACH students. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. Stecher, B., Garet, M., Holtzman, D., & Hamilton, L. (2012). Implementing measures of teacher effectiveness. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 39–43. Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., et al. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report—The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Steele, M. D., Johnson, K. R., Otten, S., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Carver, C. L. (2015). Improving instructional leadership through the development of leadership content knowledge: The case of principal learning in algebra. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775115569353. Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–48. Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359. Steinberg, M. P., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s excellence in teaching project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 535–572. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press. Stoll, L., McMahon, A., & Thomas, S. (2006). Identifying and leading effective professional learning communities.Journal of School. Leadership, 16(5), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460601600511. Stosich, E. L. (2016). Common standards and teacher evaluation: Principals and teachers’ craft coherence among multiple accountability policies. Paper presented at the Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. Supovitz, J. A. (2012). Getting at student understanding—The key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), n11. Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. The American Economic Review, 7, 3628–3651. TNTP, & Indiana Department of Education. (2012). The Indiana evaluation pilot: Mid-year report and recommendations. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education. Tripamer, A. J., Reeves, A. G., & Meinz, E. J. (2014). Teacher perceptions of teacher evaluations in the Fort Zumwalt school district. NCPEA Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 1(1), 58–74. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 891–899. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Teacher evaluation in practice: a (missed) opportunity for teachers’ professional development?. In International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers & Teaching, 23(1), 6. White, B. R., Cowhy, J., Stevens, W. D., & Sporte, S. E. (2012). Designing and implementing the next generation of teacher evaluation systems: Lessons learned from case studies in five Illinois districts. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.