Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment

Production and Operations Management - Tập 27 Số 6 - Trang 1133-1147 - 2018
Song Huang1, Xu Guan2, Ying‐Ju Chen3
1College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China
3School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Tóm tắt

This study investigates a retailer's incentive for sharing private demand information with a supplier who may encroach the retail channel by imposing a fixed entry cost. Although conventional wisdom suggests that a retailer should withhold her private demand observations to maintain an information advantage over the supplier, we obtain a different conclusion by demonstrating that the retailer may prefer to voluntarily share the demand information in anticipation of supplier encroachment. The intuition is that in face of the threat of supplier encroachment, sharing low demand information may prevent the supplier from establishing a direct selling channel, which will reduce downstream channel competition. This strategic effect of information sharing is new and only becomes dominant when there is an intermediate entry cost for encroachment and a high channel substitution rate. In contrast, when there are deviations from these conditions, the supplier's equilibrium encroachment decision is consistent and irrespective of the retailer's decision to share information, which makes withholding the demand information more beneficial to the retailer. The change of information sharing structure in the channel also leads to some unintended payoff implications, as the supplier's and channel's payoffs exhibit non‐monotonic relations to the entry cost or channel substitution rate.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00145.x

10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.002

10.1287/mksc.1070.0280

10.1007/s11142-015-9328-9

10.1287/mnsc.47.10.1326.10260

10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1032.12029

10.1287/mnsc.47.5.629.10486

10.1016/j.jretai.2009.11.002

10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00002.x

10.1287/mnsc.49.1.1.12749

10.3401/poms.1080.0068

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90048-9

10.1177/002224299706100202

10.1177/002224299606000405

10.1111/poms.12099

10.1086/466995

10.1111/poms.12651

10.1287/mksc.1080.0408

10.1287/mksc.1080.0418

10.1287/mnsc.1070.0795

10.1287/mnsc.1100.1295

10.1287/msom.2015.0562

10.1287/msom.2016.0607

10.1287/mksc.2016.0981

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1627

10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1196.177

10.1287/mnsc.1070.0851

10.1287/mnsc.2013.1780

10.1111/poms.12210

10.1287/mksc.1050.0120

10.1007/s11129-013-9132-4

Raman A., 2004, Harv. Bus. Rev., 82, 94

10.1287/mnsc.2015.2261

10.1287/mnsc.2014.2127

10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00147.x

10.1111/poms.12580

10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00476.x