Retail shareholders and the efficacy of proxy voting: evidence from auditor ratification

Cory A. Cassell1, Tyler J. Kleppe2, Jonathan E. Shipman1
1(University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA)
2University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA

Tóm tắt

We investigate the influence and implications of retail shareholder participation in the proxy voting process. Using the shareholder vote on auditor ratification—a setting which facilitates the identification of an informed vote—we find that, on average, shareholder votes against auditor ratification are not associated with audit failures but are strongly associated with investment performance. We next consider how these relations vary with the composition of a company’s voting base and find consistent evidence that the auditor ratification vote becomes less informed (i.e., associated with factors that do not reflect auditor performance) as retail ownership increases. In subsequent tests, we find that the probability of auditor dismissal is increasing in the proportion of votes against auditor ratification, and that this relation does not vary significantly with the proportion of shares held by retail investors. Collectively, our results suggest that some auditors are dismissed for factors not directly related to auditor performance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP). (2008). Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. (October 6). Agarwal, V., R. Vashishtha, and M. Venkatachalam. (2018). Mutual fund transparency and corporate myopia. The Review of Financial Studies 31 (5): 1966–2003. Aggarwal, R., P.A.C. Saffi, and J. Sturgess. (2015). The role of institutional investors in voting: Evidence from the securities lending market. The Journal of Finance 70 (5): 2309–2346. Aghion, P., J.V. Reenen, and L. Zingales. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review 103 (1): 277–304. Aobdia, D. (2019). Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. Journal of Accounting and Economics 67 (1): 144–174. Armstrong, C.S., S. Glaeser, S. Huang, and D.J. Taylor. (2019). The economics of managerial taxes and corporate risk-taking. The Accounting Review 94 (1): 1–24. Balp, G. (2018). The corporate governance role of retail investors. Loyola Consumer Law Review 31 (1): 47–113. Barua, A., K. Raghunandan, and D.V. Rama. (2017). Shareholder votes on auditor ratification and subsequent auditor dismissals. Accounting Horizons 31 (1): 129–139. Bethel, J.E., G. Hu, and Q. Wang. (2009). The market for shareholder voting rights around mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from institutional daily trading and voting. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (1): 129–145. Brav, A., M.D. Cain, and J. Zytnick. (2019). Retail shareholder participation in the proxy process: Monitoring, engagement, and voting. Working paper, Duke University, University of California at Berkeley, and Columbia University. Brown, G.W., and M.T. Cliff. (2004). Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. Journal of Empirical Finance 11 (1): 1–27. Burns, N., S. Kedia, and M. Lipson. (2010). Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting. Journal of Corporate Finance 16 (4): 443–455. Bushee, B.J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review 73 (3): 305–333. Bushee, B.J. (2004). Identifying and attracting the “right” investors: Evidence on the behavior of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 16 (4): 28–35. Bushee, B.J., and T.H. Goodman. (2007). Which institutional investors trade based on private information about earnings and returns? Journal of Accounting Research 45 (2): 289–321. Camara, K.A.D. (2004). Shareholder voting and the bundling problem in corporate law. Wisconsin Law Review 5: 1425–1495. Chen, N.X., P. Chiu, and T. Shevlin. (2018). Do analysts matter for corporate tax planning? Evidence from a natural experiment. Contemporary Accounting Research 35 (2): 794–829. Cheng, Q., T. Luo, and H. Yue. (2013). Managerial incentives and management forecast precision. The Accounting Review 88 (5): 1575–1602. Copland, J.R., D.F. Larcker, and B. Tayan. (2018). The big thumb on the scale: An overview of the proxy advisory industry. Stanford University graduate School of Business Research Paper no. 18-27. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3188174 Cunningham, L.M. (2017). Auditor ratification: Can’t get no (dis)satisfaction. Accounting Horizons 31 (1): 159–175. Dao, M., K. Raghunandan, and D.V. Rama. (2012). Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees, and audit quality. The Accounting Review 87 (1): 149–171. Dasgupta, S., and T.H. Noe. (2019). Does pay activism pay off for shareholders? Shareholder democracy and its discontents. Management Science 65 (4): 1810–1832. De Bondt, W.F.M., and R.H. Thaler. (1987). Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. The Journal of Finance 42 (3): 557–581. Foley & Lardner LLP. (2007). SEC adopts new rules for internet delivery of proxy materials. Accessed 26 August 2017. https://www.foley.com/sec-adopts-new-rules-for-internet-delivery-of-proxy-materials-10-04-2007/ Francis, J.R., and P.N. Michas. (2013). The contagion effect of low-quality audits. The Accounting Review 88 (2): 521–552. Francis, J.R., P.N. Michas, and M.D. Yu. (2013). Office size of big 4 auditors and client restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 30 (4): 1626–1661. Gillan, S.L., and L.T. Starks. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (2): 275–305. He, J., and X. Tian. (2013). The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 109 (3): 856–878. Hennes, K.M., A.J. Leone, and B.P. Miller. (2014). Determinants and market consequences of auditor dismissals after accounting restatements. The Accounting Review 89 (3): 1051–1082. Hermanson, D.R., J. Krishnan, and Z. Ye. (2009). Adverse section 404 opinions and shareholder dissatisfaction toward auditors. Accounting Horizons 23 (4): 391–409. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). (2016). 2017 U.S. Proxy Voting Guidelines Summary. (December 22). Jiambalvo, J., S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam. (2002). Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (1): 117–145. Jung, M.J., J.P. Naughton, A. Tahoun, and C. Wang. (2018). Do firms strategically disseminate? Evidence from corporate use of social media. The Accounting Review 93 (4): 225–252. Kaniel, R., G. Saar, and S. Titman. (2008). Individual investor trading and stock returns. The Journal of Finance 63 (1): 273–310. Kaplan, S.N., and P. Strӧmberg. (2009). Leveraged buyouts and private equity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23: 121–146. Karpoff, J.M., and X. Lou. (2010). Short sellers and financial misconduct. The Journal of Finance 65 (5): 1879–1913. Kastiel, K., and Y. Nili. (2016). In search of the “absent” shareholders: A new solution to retail investors’ apathy. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 41 (1): 55–104. Ke, B., and S. Ramalingegowda. (2005). Do institutional investors exploit the post-earnings announcement drift? Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 25–53. Kelly, B., and A. Ljungqvist. (2012). Testing asymmetric-information asset pricing models. The Review of Financial Studies 25 (5): 1366–1413. Krishnan, J., and Z. Ye. (2005). Why some companies seek shareholder ratification on auditor selection. Accounting Horizons 19 (4): 237–254. Lee, P. (2015). Protecting public shareholders: The case of Google’s recapitalization. Harvard Business Law Review 5 (2): 281–299. Lennox, C.S., J.R. Francis, and Z. Wang. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review 87 (2): 589–616. Liu, L., K. Raghunandan, and D.V. Rama. (2009). Financial restatements and shareholder ratifications of the auditor. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (1): 225–240. Lund, D.S. (2019). Nonvoting shares and efficient corporate governance. Stanford Law Review 71 (3): 687–745. Marshall, J. (2005). Testing the winds of reform. Financial executive (May): 39-41. Mayhew, B.W., and J.E. Pike. (2004). Does investor selection of auditors enhance auditor independence? The Accounting Review 79 (3): 797–822. Muth, R. (1987). One share, one vote: The SEC’s duty to protect investors and ensure fair administration among the securities exchanges. Washington and Lee Law Review 44 (3): 985–1000. Newton, N.J., D. Wang, and M.S. Wilkins. (2013). Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (3): 31–67. Petersen, M. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies 22 (1): 435–480. Piotroski, J.D., and D.T. Roulstone. (2004). The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry, and firm-specific information into stock prices. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 1119–1151. Pontiff, J., and A. Woodgate. (2008). Share issuance and cross-sectional returns. The Journal of Finance 63 (2): 921–945. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013). Standing advisory group meeting: Discussion – Audit quality indicators (May 15–16). PCAOB. Reid, L.C., and J.V. Carcello. (2017). Investor reaction to the prospect of mandatory audit firm rotation. The Accounting Review 92 (1): 183–211. Sainty, B.J., G.K. Taylor, and D.D. Williams. (2002). Investor dissatisfaction toward auditors. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance 17 (2): 111–136. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2007). 17 CFR parts 240, 249, and 274: Internet availability of proxy materials (March 30). SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2015). Proxy voting roundtable. (February 19). SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2018a). Statement announcing SEC staff roundtable on the proxy process. (July 30). SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2018b). Roundtable on the proxy process. (November 15). SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2018c). Perpetual dual-class stock: The case against corporate royalty. (February 15). SEC. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2021). Every vote counts: The importance of fund voting and disclosure. (March 17). SEC. Solomon, D., and E. Soltes. (2015). What are we meeting for? The consequences of private meetings with investors. The Journal of Law and Economics 58 (2): 325–355. Srinivasan, S. (2005). Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (2): 291–334. Strine, L.E. (2017). Who bleeds when the wolves bite? A flesh-and-blood perspective on hedge fund activism and our strange corporate governance system. Yale Law Journal 126: 1870–1970. Swanquist, Q.T., and R.L. Whited. (2015). Do clients avoid “contaminated” offices? The economic consequences of low-quality audits. The Accounting Review 90 (6): 2537–2570. Tanyi, P.N., and K.C. Roland. (2017). Market reaction to auditor ratification vote tally. Accounting Horizons 31 (1): 141–157. Utama, S., and W.M. Cready. (1997). Institutional ownership, differential predisclosure precision and trading volume at announcement dates. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (2): 129–150. Walther, B. (1997). Investor sophistication and market earnings estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (2): 157–179.