Retail Influence on Evoked Set Formation and Final Choice of Shopping Goods
Tóm tắt
Investigates retailers′ relative influence on consumers′ sequential decision‐making process of forming evoked sets and then making purchase decisions from the evoked sets. Describes a study in which consumers report on 23 durable goods grouped into three product categories. Evoked set sizes were smaller than those for previously studied convenience goods but larger than those suggested by recent reports on consumer durable purchases. The findings indicate that the influence of the retailer is higher in evoked set development than in the final purchase stage of consumer decision making and that the influence of the retailer on product choice varies significantly across different categories of durable products.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Howard, J.A., Marketing Management: Analysis and Planning, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1963.
2. Howard, J.A., Consumer Behaviour in Marketing Strategy, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
3. Baker, W.E. and Wilkie, W.L., “Factors Affecting Information Search for Consumer Durables”, Working Paper 92‐115, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA, May 1992.
4. Spiggle, S. and Sewall, M.A., “A Choice Sets Model of Retail Selection”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.51, April1987, pp. 97‐111.
5. Black, W.C., “Choice‐set Definition in Patronage Modeling”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 60, Summer 1984, pp. 63‐85.
6. Narayana, C.L. and Marking, R.J., “Consumer Behaviour and Product Performance: An Alternative Consideration”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, 1975, pp. 1‐6.
7. Campbell, B.M., “The Existence of Evoked Set and Determinants of Its Magnitude in Brand Choice Behaviour”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, SC, 1969.
8. Jarvis, L.P. and Wilcox, J.B., “Evoked Set Size – Some Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence”, in Greer, T.V. (Ed.), Combined Proceedings of the Fall Conference of the American Marketing Association, Vol.35, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1973, pp. 236‐40.
9. Ostlund, L.E., “Evoked Set Size: Some Empirical Results”, in Greer, T.V. (Ed.), Increasing Marketing Productivity and Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of Marketing, Vol. 35, (AMA Combined Proceedings), American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1973, pp. 226‐30.
10. May, F.E. and Homans, R., “Evoked Set Size and the Level of Information Processing in Brand Comprehension and Choice Criteria”, in Perault, W. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, Association for Consumer Research, 1977, pp. 172‐5.
11. Belonax, J. and Mittelsteadt, R.A., “Evoked Set Size as a Function of Number of Choice Criteria and Information Variability”, in Hunt, H.K. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, Association for Consumer Research, Vol. 5, 1978, pp. 48‐51.
12. Silk, A.J. and Urban, G.L., “Pre‐test Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, May1978, pp. 171‐91.
13. Hauser, J.R. and Wernerfelt, B., “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, 1990.
14. Gronhaug, K., “Some Factors Influencing the Size of Buyers Evoked Set”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 7, Winter 1973/4, pp. 232‐41.
15. Stewart, D.W. and Punj, G., “Factors Associated with Changes in Evoked Set among Purchasers of Automobiles”, in Walker, B.J. et al., Educators Conference Proceedings, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1982, pp. 61‐5.
16. Gronhaug, K. and Troye, S.V., “Exploring the Content of the Evoked Set in Car Buying”, European Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, 1983, pp. 98‐104.
17. Hauser, J.R., Urban, G.L. and Roberts, J.H., “Forecasting Sales of a New Consumer Durable”, in Zufryden, F.S. (Ed.), Advances and Practices of Marketing Science, The Institute of Management Science, Providence, RI, 1983, pp. 115‐28.
18. Abougomaah, N.H., Schlacter, J.L. and Gaidis, W., “Elimination and Choice Phases in Evoked Set Formation”, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 4, Fall 1987, pp. 67‐73.
19. Belonax, J. and Javalgi, R.G., “The Influence of Involvement and Product Class Quality on Consumer Choice Sets”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 17, Summer 1989, pp. 209‐16.
20. Alba, J.W. and Chattopadhyay, A., “Effects of Content and Part‐category Cues on Recall of Competing Brands”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XII, August 1985, pp. 340‐52.
21. Sutton, R.J., “Using Empirical Data to Investigate the Likelihood of Brands Being Admitted or Readmitted into an Established Evoked Set”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 15,Fall 1987, pp. 82‐9.
22. Zimmer, M.A. and Golden, L.L. “Impressions of Retail Stores: A Content Analysis of Consumer Images”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64, Fall 1988, pp. 265‐93.
23. Pettijohn, L.S., Mellot, D.W. and Pettijohn, C.E., “The Relationship between Retailer Image and Brand Image”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 9, July/August 1992, pp. 311‐28.
24. Milliman, R.E., “Using Background Music to Affect Behaviour of Supermarket Shoppers”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, Summer 1982, pp.86‐91.
25. Bellizzi, J.A., Crowley, A.E. and Hasty, R.H., “The Effects of Color in Store Design”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 59, Spring 1983, pp. 21‐45.
26. Park, C.W., Iyer, E.S. and Smith, D.C., “The Effects of Situational Factors on In‐store Grocery Shopping Behavior: The Role of Store Environment and Time Available for Shopping”, Journal of Consumer‐Research, Vol. 15, March 1989, pp. 422‐33.
27. Hawkins, D.I., Best, R.J. and Coney, K.A., Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, 5th ed., Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1992.
28. Berry, L.L., “The Components of Department Store Image: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 45, Spring 1969, pp. 3‐20.
29. Dobni, D. and Zinkham, G.M., “In Search of Brand Image: Foundation Analysis”, in Golbert, M.E., Gorn, G. and Polly, R.W. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, Vol.17, 1990, pp. 110‐19.
30. Felgner, B., “Retailers Grab Power, Control Marketplace”, Marketing News, Vol. 23, 16 January 1989, pp. 1‐2.
31. Therrien, L., “Want Shelf Space at the Supermarket? Ante Up”, Business Week, 7 August 1989, pp. 60‐1.
32. Alpert, F.H., Kamins, M.A. and Graham, J.L., “An Examination of Reseller Buyer Attitudes toward Order of Brand Entry”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, July 1992, pp. 25‐37.
33. Ettenson, R. and Wagner, J., “Retail Buyers′ Salability Judgements: A Comparison of Information Use across Three Levels of Experience”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 62, Spring 1986, pp. 41‐63.
34. Levy, M. and Weitz, B.A., Retailing Management, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1992.
35. Brown, J.J. and Wildt, A.R., “Consideration Set Measurement”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 20, Summer 1992, pp. 235‐43.
36. Bresoux, J.E. and Cheron, E.J., “Brand Categorization and Product Involvement”, in Goldberg, M.E., Gorn, G. and Polly, R.W. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research,Association for Consumer Research , Provo, UT, Vol. 17, 1990, pp. 101‐9.