Reswitching and capital models
Tóm tắt
Reswitching of techniques was shown to be possible in Leontief’s input–output model with flow and stock matrices. The finding is unearthed and related to the capital debate based on Sraffian models.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cohen AJ, Harcourt GC (2003) Retrospectives: whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? J Econ Perspect 17(1):199–214
Han Z, Schefold B (2006) An empirical investigation of paradoxes: reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory. Camb J Econ 30:737–765
Houthakker HS (1955) The Pareto distribution and the Cobb–Douglas production function in activity analysis. Rev Econ Stud 23(1):27–31
Leontief W (1986) Technological change, prices, wages and rates of return on capital in the U.S. economy. In: Leontief W (ed) Input-output economics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Pasinetti LL (2003) Cambridge capital controversies. J Econ Perspect 17(4):227–228
Samuelson P (1966) A summing up. Q J Econ 80(4):568–583
ten Raa T (1986) Dynamic input-output analysis with distributed activities. Rev Econ Stat 68(2):300–310
ten Raa T (1997) Bródy’s capital. In: Simonovits A, Steenge AE (eds) Prices, growth and cycles. Macmillan, London, pp 133–137
ten Raa T (2019) The use-make framework and the derivation of functional forms in production theory. Econ Syst Res 31(1):132–141
ten Raa T, Chakraborty D, Das T (1989) Working capital in an input-output model. Econ Syst Res 1(1):53–68
Zambelli S (2018) The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical. Camb J Econ 42:383–426
Bródy A (1970) Production, prices and planning