Reswitching and capital models

Journal of Economic Structures - Tập 11 - Trang 1-5 - 2022
Thijs ten Raa1
1Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Reswitching of techniques was shown to be possible in Leontief’s input–output model with flow and stock matrices. The finding is unearthed and related to the capital debate based on Sraffian models.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cohen AJ, Harcourt GC (2003) Retrospectives: whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? J Econ Perspect 17(1):199–214 Han Z, Schefold B (2006) An empirical investigation of paradoxes: reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory. Camb J Econ 30:737–765 Houthakker HS (1955) The Pareto distribution and the Cobb–Douglas production function in activity analysis. Rev Econ Stud 23(1):27–31 Leontief W (1986) Technological change, prices, wages and rates of return on capital in the U.S. economy. In: Leontief W (ed) Input-output economics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Pasinetti LL (2003) Cambridge capital controversies. J Econ Perspect 17(4):227–228 Samuelson P (1966) A summing up. Q J Econ 80(4):568–583 ten Raa T (1986) Dynamic input-output analysis with distributed activities. Rev Econ Stat 68(2):300–310 ten Raa T (1997) Bródy’s capital. In: Simonovits A, Steenge AE (eds) Prices, growth and cycles. Macmillan, London, pp 133–137 ten Raa T (2019) The use-make framework and the derivation of functional forms in production theory. Econ Syst Res 31(1):132–141 ten Raa T, Chakraborty D, Das T (1989) Working capital in an input-output model. Econ Syst Res 1(1):53–68 Zambelli S (2018) The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical. Camb J Econ 42:383–426 Bródy A (1970) Production, prices and planning