Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams

SAGE Publications - Tập 68 Số 6 - Trang 1021-1047 - 2015
Abraham Carmeli1, Jane E. Dutton2, Ashley Elizabeth Hardin2
1Tel Aviv University, Israel
2Ross School of Business, USA

Tóm tắt

In four studies we examine whether and why respectfully engaging with other organizational members can augment creativity for individuals and teams. We develop and test a model in which respectful engagement among organizational members facilitates relational information processing, which in turn results in enhanced creative behaviors. We found a similar pattern across all four studies – respectful engagement is indirectly related, through relational information processing, to creative behavior at both the individual and team levels. These findings underscore the importance of respectful engagement in facilitating relational information processing and fostering creative behaviors at both the individual and team levels.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8

Amabile TM, 1988, Research in Organizational Behavior, 123

Anderson N, 1994, Personnel Management, 26, 81

Ashforth BE, 1999, Academy of Management Review, 24, 413

10.1037/a0018761

10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963

10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

10.1002/0471725153

10.1093/clipsy.bph077

Blau P, 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life

10.1037/a0013935

Bliese PD, 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 349

10.1086/421787

10.1037/h0046016

10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141

10.1002/job.565

Carmeli A, The Journal of Creative Behavior

10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001

10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.013

10.1177/1476127011434797

10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082

Chaiken S, 1999, Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology

10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6

10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774

10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628

10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739

10.1177/1088868307304092

DeVellis RF, 2003, Scale Development: Theory and Applications

Di Stefano G, Gino F, Pisano G, Staats B (2014) Learning by thinking: How reflection aids performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

Dutton JE, 2003, Energize Your Workplace: How to Build and Sustain High-Quality Connections at Work

Dutton JE, Qualitative Organizational Research: Best Papers from the Davis Conference on Qualitative Research, Volume 3, Information Age Publishing

Dutton JE, 2007, Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation, 387

10.2307/2666999

10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

10.1037/h0056932

10.2307/258787

10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300

Fredrickson BL, 2013, Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become

10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625

10.1023/A:1017967009252

Gittell JH, 2003, Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, 279

Goffman E, 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior

Gottman JM, 1994, Why Marriages Succeed or Fail… and How You Can Make Yours Last

10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

10.1086/225469

10.1080/10400419.2004.9651457

10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x

Hambrick DC, 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 171

Hargadon A, 2008, Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 323

Harrington DM, 1990, Theories of Creativity, 143

Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. URL: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

10.1207/s15327752jpa4505_1

Homans GC, 1974, Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms

10.1177/0090591792020002001

10.2307/2393638

Josselson R, 1995, The Space Between Us: Exploring the Dimensions of Human Relationships

10.1177/001872679204500402

10.1002/job.682

10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004

10.1111/0022-4537.00148

10.1287/orsc.1110.0647

10.5465/amj.2010.54533207

10.1177/014920639802400105

10.1177/0149206306290712

10.2307/258792

Mead GH, 1934, Mind, Self, and Society

10.2307/2392963

Miller JB, 1997, The Healing Connection

10.1037/a0021574

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0015

10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

O’Reilly CA, Flatt S (1989) Executive team demography: Organizational innovation and firm performance. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.

10.1111/1464-0597.00013

Paulus PB, 2008, Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 165

Paulus PB, 2012, Group Processes, 215

10.5465/amj.2006.20785503

10.2307/30040691

10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Poplin M, 1994, Voices from the Inside: A Report on Schooling from Inside the Classroom

10.3758/BF03206553

10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009

10.1080/17439760701750980

10.4159/9780674042605

10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Rietzschel EF, 2009, Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Creativity in Groups, 1

10.2307/2393868

Rochlin GI, 1989, Organization & Environment, 3, 159

10.1037/h0045357

Rogers CR, 1967, Person to Person: The Problem of Being Human, 85

Rosenberg MB, 2003, Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life, 2

10.2307/2392563

Sennett R, 2003, Respect in a World of Inequality

10.5465/amj.2009.41330806

10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709

10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151

10.1287/orsc.1090.0519

Stephens JP, 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, 385

10.1177/0021886312471193

10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677

10.1177/104649648301400203

10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.805

10.1177/0149206307300812

Thibaut JW, 1959, The Social Psychology of Groups

10.1080/00224545.1981.9922732

10.1086/432782

10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510

Vogus TJ, 2006, Labor and Employment Relations Association Series, 164

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0050

10.2307/2393339

West MA, 1996, Handbook of Work Group Psychology, 555

10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.323

10.2307/3069410

10.1177/0021886308328010