Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice

Emerald - Tập 40 Số 4 - Trang 341-355 - 2020
Remko van Hoek

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe COVID-19 crisis has caused major supply chain disruptions, and these can be traced back to basic supply chain risks that have previously been well identified in literature. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a pathway for closing the gap between supply chain resilience research and efforts in industry to develop a more resilient supply chain.Design/methodology/approachBased upon virtual roundtables with supply chain executives, supplemented with interviews and publicly available datapoints about COVID-19 impact on the supply chain, we explore challenges in industry and suggest opportunity areas where research can support efforts in industry to improve supply chain resilience.FindingsDuring the COVID-19 crisis, participating supply chain executives are experiencing textbook supply, demand and control risks in the supply chain. They also observe a lack of preparedness, shortcomings of current response plans and the need for greater supply chain resilience. Focus areas in improving resilience mirror generic recommendations from literature and provide a rich opportunity to reduce the gap between research findings and efforts in industry.Research limitations/implicationsMore empirical, event-based and less conceptual research into supply chain resilience has been called for several times during the last two decades. COVID-19 provides a very rich opportunity for researchers to conduct the type of research that has been called for. This research may contribute to the structurally de-risking of supply chains. Areas of research opportunity include decision models for supply chain design that avoid overfocusing on costs only, and that consider the value of flexibility, short response times and multiple sources as well as methods for enriching supplier segmentation and evaluation models to reduce a focus on savings and payment terms only.Practical implicationsKey levers for de-risking the supply chain include the need to balance global sourcing with nearshore and local sourcing, the adoption of multiple sources and a greater utilization of information technology to drive more complete and immediate information availability. Perhaps most importantly, talent management in supply chain management needs to promote a focus not just on costs, but also on resilience as well as on learning from current events to improve decision-making.Social implicationsThere is a great opportunity for supply chain managers to grow their contribution to society beyond risk response into the proactive reduction of risks for the future. Researchers can serve society by informing this progress with impactful research.Originality/valueThis article offers initial empirical exploration of supply chain risks experienced in the context of COVID-19 and approaches considered in industry to improve supply chain resilience. Opportunities for empirical, event-based and less conceptual research that has been called for years, are identified. This research can help close the gap between supply chain resilience research and efforts in industry to improve supply chain resilience. Hopefully the research opportunities identified can inspire the flurry of research that can be expected in response to the multiple special issues planned by journals in our field.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2004, Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown, MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53

2004, Building the resilient supply chain, International Journal of Logistics Management, 15, 1

1958, Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers, Harvard Business Review, 37

1961, Industrial Dynamics

2014, Logistics Management and Strategy

2007, Risk and supply chain management: creating a research agenda, International Journal of Logistics Management, 18, 197

1983, Purchasing must become supply management, Harvard Business Review, 61, 109

2020, Coronavirus is proving that we need more resilient supply chains, Harvard Business Review Digital Article

2020, It is up to manufacturers to keep their suppliers afloat, Harvard Business Review Digital Article

2008, Global supply chain risk management, Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 133, 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00072.x

2018, Leading Procurement Strategy

2010, Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework, Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 1, 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x

2019, The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience, Journal of Business Logistics, 40, 56, 10.1111/jbl.12202

2020, Dealing with the unpredictable: supply chain resilience, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 40, 1

2020, Three scenarios to guide your global supply chain recovery, Sloan Management Review Digital Article

2012, Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management, Production and Operations Management, 21, 1, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x

2006, Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9, 33, 10.1080/13675560500405584

2019, Exploring blockchain implementation in the supply chain: learning from pioneers and RFID research, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39, 829, 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0022

2019, Integrating Blockchain into Supply Chain Management

2020, How the pandemic is pushing blockchain forward, Harvard Business Review Digital Article

2020, Where we are heading and the research that can help us get there – Executive perspectives on the anniversary of the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26

2019, Building supply-side resilience – a behavioural view, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 40, 11, 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0562

2008, An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk, Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 307, 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 40 Số 4

341-355

Thông tin tác giả