Reply to: Could superimposed electromyostimulation be an effective training to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity? Methodological considerations for its development

Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, Simonsen T, Helgesen C, Hjorth N, Bach R, Hoff J (2007) Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(4):665–671. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180304570

Maffiuletti NA (2010) Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 110(2):223–234. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y

Mathes S, Lehnen N, Link T, Bloch W, Mester J, Wahl P (2017) Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity. Eur J Appl Physiol. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3572-6

Miyamoto T, Kamada H, Tamaki A, Moritani T (2016) Low-intensity electrical muscle stimulation induces significant increases in muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness. Eur J Sports Sci 16(8):1104–1110. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1151944

Nuhr M, Crevenna R, Gohlsch B, Bittner C, Pleiner J, Wiesinger G, Fialka-Moser V, Quittan M, Pette D (2003) Functional and biochemical properties of chronically stimulated human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 89(2):202–208. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0792-8

Thériault R, Boulay MR, Thériault G, Simoneau JA (1996) Electrical stimulation-induced changes in performance and fiber type proportion of human knee extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74(4):311–317