Khả năng tái lập của các đánh giá công cụ thực nghiệm trong kỹ thuật phần mềm và hệ thống dựa trên mô hình với MATLAB/Simulink
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#khả năng tái lập #phát triển dựa trên mô hình #MATLAB/Simulink #đánh giá công cụ #thử nghiệm thực nghiệmTài liệu tham khảo
Brambilla M, Cabot J, Wimmer M (2017) Model-driven software engineering in practice. Synth Lect Softw Eng 3(1):1–207
Völter M, Stahl T, Bettin J, Haase A, Helsen S (2013) Model-driven software development: technology, engineering, management. John Wiley & Sons
Robert France and Bernhard Rumpe, “Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap,” Future of Software Engineering (FOSE ’07), 2007, pp. 37–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/FOSE.2007.14
Shaw M (2002) What makes good research in software engineering? Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 4(1):1–7
Meyer B (2010) Empirical research: questions from software engineering. In: 4th international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM 2010)
Barba LA (2018) Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03311
Juristo N., Gómez O.S. (2012) Replication of Software Engineering Experiments. In: Meyer B., Nordio M. (eds) Empirical Software Engineering and Verification. LASER 2010, LASER 2009, LASER 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25231-0_2
Basili VR, Shull F, Lanubile F (1999) Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25(4):456–473
Mark D. Wilkinson., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand J. Aalbersberg, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Lamprecht AL, Garcia L, Kuzak M, Martinez C, Arcila R, Martin Del Pico E, Dominguez Del Angel V, van de Sandt S, Ison J, Martinez PA, et al. (2019) Towards fair principles for research software. Data Sci pp. 1–23
Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB (2007) Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PloS One 2(3):e308
Whittle J, Hutchinson J, Rouncefield M, Burden H, Heldal R (2013) Industrial adoption of model-driven engineering: Are the tools really the problem? In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. pp. 1–17. Springer
Boll A, Kehrer T (2020) On the replicability of experimental tool evaluations in model-based development. In: International conference on systems modelling and management. Springer, pp. 111–130
Barbara Kitchenham, Stuart Charters, Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Technical Report, Version 2.3, Keele University and University of Durham, 9 July 2007
Rebaya A, Gasmi K, Hasnaoui S (2018) A Simulink-based rapid prototyping workflow for optimizing software/hardware programming. In: 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). pp. 1–6. IEEE
Kuroki Y, Yoo M, Yokoyama T (2016) A Simulink to UML model transformation tool for embedded control software development. In: IEEE international conference on industrial technology, ICIT 2016, Taipei, Taiwan. IEEE, pp. 700–706. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2016.7474835
Stephan M, Cordy JR (2015) Identifying instances of model design patterns and antipatterns using model clone detection. In: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on modeling in software engineering. MiSE ’15, IEEE Press, pp. 48–53
Matinnejad R, Nejati S, Briand LC, Bruckmann T (May 2016) Automated test suite generation for time-continuous Simulink models. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp. 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884797
Matinnejad R, Nejati S, Briand LC, Bruckmann T (2019) Test generation and test prioritization for Simulink models with dynamic behavior. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 45(9):919–944. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2018.2811489
Nejati S, Gaaloul K, Menghi C, Briand LC, Foster S, Wolfe D (2019) Evaluating model testing and model checking for finding requirements violations in Simulink models. In: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering. ESEC/FSE 2019, Association for computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338906.3340444
Rao AC, Raouf A, Dhadyalla G, Pasupuleti V (2017) Mutation testing based evaluation of formal verification tools. In: 2017 international conference on dependable systems and their applications (DSA), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSA.2017.10
Gerlitz T, Kowalewski S (2016) Flow sensitive slicing for MATLAB/Simulink models. In: 2016 13th working IEEE/IFIP conference on software architecture (WICSA), pp. 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2016.23
Khelifi A, Ben Lakhal NM, Gharsallaoui H, Nasri O (2018) Artificial neural network-based fault detection. In: 2018 5th international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT), pp. 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394963
Oussalem O, Kourchi M, Rachdy A, Ajaamoum M, Idadoub H, Jenkal S (2019) A low cost controller of PV system based on Arduino board and INC algorithm. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.689
Norouzi P, Kıvanç ÖC, Üstün Ö (2017) High performance position control of double sided air core linear brushless DC motor. In: 2017 10th international conference on electrical and electronics engineering (ELECO), pp. 233–238
Gallego-Calderon J, Natarajan A (2015) Assessment of wind turbine drive-train fatigue loads under torsional excitation. Eng Struct 103:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.008
Rashid M, Anwar MW, Khan AM (2015) Toward the tools selection in model based system engineering for embedded systems—a systematic literature review. J Syst Softw 106:150–163
Elberzhager F, Rosbach A, Bauer T (2013) Analysis and testing of Matlab simulink models: a systematic mapping study. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international workshop on joining AcadeMiA and industry contributions to testing automation. JAMAICA 2013, association for computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2489280.2489285
Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR (2019) Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods 11:181–217
Yakimenko OA (2019) Engineering computations and modeling in MATLAB®/Simulink®. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 200 Reston, VA 20191-5807 ISBN (print): 978-1-62410-515-9 https://doi.org/10.2514/4.105159
Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2013) A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. J Informetr 7(4):833–849
Boll A, Vieregg N, Kehrer T, The download link of digital artifacts of this paper, for reuse and replication. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13633928
Bourke T, Carcenac F, Colaço JL, Pagano B, Pasteur C, Pouzet M (2017) A synchronous look at the simulink standard library. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126516
Chowdhury SA, Mohian S, Mehra S, Gawsane S, Johnson TT, Csallner C (2018) Automatically finding bugs in a commercial cyber-physical system development tool chain with SLforge. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp. 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180231
Boström P, Wiik J (2015) Contract-based verification of discrete-time multi-rate simulink models. Softw Syst Model. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0477-x
Arrieta A, Wang S, Arruabarrena A, Markiegi U, Sagardui G, Etxeberria L (2018) Multi-objective black-box test case selection for cost-effectively testing simulation models. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference. GECCO ’18, association for computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, p. 1411 – 1418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205455.3205490
Arrieta A, Wang S, Markiegi U, Arruabarrena A, Etxeberria L, Sagardui G (2019) Pareto efficient multi-objective black-box test case selection for simulation-based testing. Inf Softw Technol 114:137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.06.009
Mancini T, Mari F, Massini A, Melatti I, Tronci E (2015) Sylvaas: system level formal verification as a service. In: 2015 23rd euromicro international conference on parallel, distributed, and network-based processing, pp. 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2015.119
Morozov A, Ding K, Chen T, Janschek K (2017) Test suite prioritization for efficient regression testing of model-based automotive software. In: 2017 international conference on software analysis, testing and evolution (SATE), pp. 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/SATE.2017.11
Holling D, Hofbauer A, Pretschner A, Gemmar M (2016) Profiting from unit tests for integration testing. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on software testing, verification and validation (ICST), pp. 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2016.28
Strathmann T, Oehlerking J (2015) Verifying properties of an electro-mechanical braking system. In: 2nd workshop on applied verification of continuous and hybrid systems (ARCH 2015)
Bertram V, Maoz S, Ringert JO, Rumpe B, von Wenckstern M (2017) Component and connector views in practice: An experience report. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. p. 167–177. MODELS ’17, IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS.2017.29
Kusmenko E, Shumeiko I, Rumpe B, von Wenckstern M (2018) Fast simulation preorder algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on model-driven engineering and software development. MODELSWARD 2018, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda, Setubal, PRT. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006722102560267
Bertram V, Maoz S, Ringert JO, Rumpe B, von Wenckstern M (2017) Component and connector views in practice: an experience report. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International conference on model driven engineering languages and systems (MODELS), IEEE, pp. 167–177
Kitchenham B, Pretorius R, Budgen D, Brereton OP, Turner M, Niazi M, Linkman S (2010) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol 52(8):792–805
Frâncila Weidt and Rodrigo Silva, Systematic literature review in computer science-a practical guide, Technical Report, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, November 2016, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35453.87524
Stapić Z, López EG, Cabot AG, de Marcos Ortega L, Strahonja V (2012) Performing systematic literature review in software engineering. In: CECIIS 2012-23rd international conference
Masuzzo P, Martens L (2017) Do you speak open science? resources and tips to learn the language. Tech. rep, PeerJ Preprints
Tomita T, Ishii D, Murakami T, Takeuchi S, Aoki T (2019) A scalable Monte-Carlo test-case generation tool for large and complex simulink models. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering (MiSE). pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MiSE.2019.00014
Hussain A, Sher HA, Murtaza AF, Al-Haddad K (2019) Improved restricted control set model predictive control (iRCS-MPC) based maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic module. IEEE Access 7:149422–149432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946747
Jiang Z, Wu X, Dong Z, Mu M Optimal test case generation for Simulink models using slicing. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on software quality, reliability and security companion (QRS-C), pp. 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C.2017.67
Chowdhury SA (2018) Understanding and improving cyber-physical system models and development tools. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th international conference on software engineering: companion (ICSE-Companion), pp. 452–453
Kehrer T, Kelter U, Pietsch P, Schmidt M (2012) Adaptability of model comparison tools. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering. IEEE, pp. 306–309
Kehrer T, Kelter U, Ohrndorf M, Sollbach T (2012) Understanding model evolution through semantically lifting model differences with SiLift. In: 28th IEEE international conference on software maintenance (ICSM). IEEE, pp. 638–641
Wille D, Babur Ö, Cleophas L, Seidl C, van den Brand M, Schaefer I (2018) Improving custom-tailored variability mining using outlier and cluster detection. Sci Comput Program 163:62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2018.04.002
Chowdhury SA, Varghese LS, Mohian S, Johnson TT, Csallner C (2018) A curated corpus of Simulink models for model-based empirical studies. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 4th international workshop on software engineering for smart cyber-physical systems (SEsCPS). IEEE, pp. 45–48
Chowdhury SA, Shrestha SL, Johnson TT, Csallner C (2020) SLEMI: Equivalence modulo input (EMI) based mutation of CPS models for finding compiler bugs in Simulink. In: Proceeding 42nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering (ICSE), ACM. To appear
Sanchez B, Zolotas A, Rodriguez HH, Kolovos D, Paige R (2019) On-the-fly translation and execution of OCL-like queries on simulink models. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE 22nd international conference on model driven engineering languages and systems (MODELS). IEEE, pp. 205–215
Bourbouh H, Garoche PL, Garion C, Gurfinkel A, Kahsai T, Thirioux X (2017) Automated analysis of stateflow models. In: 21st International conference on logic for programming, artificial intelligence and reasoning (LPAR 2017), pp. 144–161
Ernst G, Arcaini P, Donze A, Fainekos G, Mathesen L, Pedrielli G, Yaghoubi S, Yamagata Y, Zhang Z (2019) Arch-comp 2019 category report: falsification. In: ARCH@ CPSIoTWeek, pp. 129–140
Dajsuren Y, van den Brand MG, Serebrenik A, Roubtsov S (2013) Simulink models are also software: modularity assessment. In: 9th international ACM sigsoft conference on quality of software architectures (QoSA), pp. 99–106
Dajsuren Y (2015) On the design of an architecture framework and quality evaluation for automotive software systems. Ph.D. thesis, Department of mathematics and computer science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Hebig R, Quang TH, Chaudron MR, Robles G, Fernandez MA (2016) The quest for open source projects that use UML: mining GitHub. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th international conference on model driven engineering languages and systems, pp. 173–183
Philip Langer, Tanja Mayerhofer, Manuel Wimmer, Gerti Kappel, On the Usage of UML: Initial Results of Analyzing Open UML Models, Modellierung 2014, Editors: Hans-Georg Fill, Dimitris Karagiannis, Ulrich Reimer, Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 2014 ISBN 978-388579-619-0 http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/20950