Reperfusion coronaire dans l’infarctus myocardique aigu
Tài liệu tham khảo
The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of The European Society of Cardiology, 2002, Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, Eur. Heart. J, 24, 28
Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi Nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI), 1986, Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction, Lancet, 1, 397
1994, Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients, Lancet, 343, 311, 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91161-4
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT 2) Investigators, 1999, Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction : the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial, Lancet, 354, 716, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07403-6
Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO III) Investigators, 1997, A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction, N Engl. J. Med, 337, 1118, 10.1056/NEJM199710163371603
Keeley, 2003, Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials, Lancet, 361, 13, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7
Steg, 2003, Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty : data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial, Circulation, 108, 2851, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103122.10021.F2
Juliard, 1999, A matched comparison of the combination of prehospital thrombolysis and standby rescue angioplasty with primary angioplasty, Am. J. Cardiol., 83, 305, 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00858-3
Dalby, 2003, Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis, Circulation, 108, 1809, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091088.63921.8C
Andersen, 2003, for the DANAMI-2 Investigators. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, N Engl. J. Med., 349, 733, 10.1056/NEJMoa025142
Widimsky, 2003, Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction : final results of the randomized national multicentre trial : PRAGUE-2, Eur. Heart. J., 24, 94, 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00468-2
Bonnefoy, 2002, Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction : a randomised study, Lancet, 360, 825, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09963-4
Aversano, 2002, Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery : a randomized controlled trial, J.A.M.A., 287, 1943, 10.1001/jama.287.15.1943
Zhu, 2001, Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, Am. J. Cardiol., 88, 297, 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01645-9
Stone, 2002, for the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction, N Engl. J. Med., 346, 957, 10.1056/NEJMoa013404
Montalescot, 2004, Early vs late administration of glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A meta-analysis, J.A.M.A, 292, 362, 10.1001/jama.292.3.362
Canto, 2000, The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators, N. Engl. J. Med., 342, 1573, 10.1056/NEJM200005253422106
Hochman, 2001, for the SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock : one-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock, J.A.M.A., 285, 190, 10.1001/jama.285.2.190
Grzybowski, 2003, Mortality benefit of immediate revascularization of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy : a propensity analysis, J.A.M.A., 290, 1891, 10.1001/jama.290.14.1891
De luca, 2004, Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction : every minute of delay counts, Circulation, 109, 1223, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121424.76486.20
Morrison, 2000, Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis, J.A.M.A., 283, 2686, 10.1001/jama.283.20.2686
Danchin, 2004, Impact of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on 1-year outcome. Results from the French nationwide USIC 2000 registry, Circulation, 110, 1909, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143144.82338.36
Hasdai, 2002, A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin ; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS), Eur. Heart. J., 23, 1190, 10.1053/euhj.2002.3193
Simoons, 1988, Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction : no additional benefit from immediate percutaneous coronary angioplasty, Lancet, 1, 197, 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91062-8
Fernandez-Aviles, 2004, Prospective randomized trial comparing a routine invasive strategy within 24 hours to thrombolysis versus an ischemia-guided conservative approach to acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation : the Gracia-1 trial, Lancet, 364, 1045, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17059-1
Antman E.M., Van De Werf F. — Pharmacoinvasive Therapy The future of treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 109, 2480-2486.