Religion, classification struggles, and the state’s exercise of symbolic power

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 50 - Trang 255-281 - 2020
Sadia Saeed1
1Department of Sociology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, USA

Tóm tắt

The capacity to classify social groups legally is a central characteristic of modern states. Social groups, however, often resist the classificatory schemas of the state. This raises the following question: how do modern states exercise symbolic power in social fields beset by acute classification struggles? While existing scholarship has demonstrated that states exercise symbolic power, there has not been a concomitant effort to systematize and theorize the various strategies through which they do so. This article addresses this lacuna through examining classification struggles centered on a number of “heterodox” religious groups that have historically been perceived as deviant from mainstream religions. Specifically, it looks at Falun Gong in China, Mormons in the United States, and Baha’is in Egypt. The analysis draws attention to three strategies through which states exercise symbolic power: coercive classification, wherein the deviant group is forcibly fixed as such in law; juridical normalization, whereby the deviant group is allowed to enter the mainstream by shedding “problematic” ritual practices; and legal erasure, whereby the deviant group is kept out of the official classificatory system so that it becomes a legal non-entity. In summary, this article both identifies the religious field as a critical domain in which states of various ideological orientations exercise symbolic power and deploys this analysis to identify distinct strategies through which they do so.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), 58–89.

Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2018). Classification struggles. Cambridge: Polity.

Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state. Cambridge: Polity.

Brookshaw, D. P., & Fazel, S. B. (2007). The Baha’is of Iran: Socio-historical studies. London: Routledge.

Chaves, M. (2004). Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces, 72(3), 749–774.

Edmunds, G. F. (1882). Political aspects of Mormonism. Harper's New Monthly Magazine, 64(380), 285–288.

Feldman, N. (2008). What is it about Mormonism? New York Times Magazine, January 6.

Finke, R., & Stark, R. (2005). The churching of America, 1776–2005: Winners and losers in our religious economy. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hanna, M. W. (2015). Public order and Egypt’s statist tradition. Review of Faith & International Affairs, 13(1), 23–30.

Kuru, A. T. (2009). Secularism and state policies toward religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayrl, D., & Quinn, S. (2016). Defining the state from within: Boundaries, schemas, and associational policymaking. Sociological Theory, 34(1), 1–26.

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, K. J., & Orloff, A. S. (2017). Introduction: The many hands of the state. In K. J. Morgan & A. S. Orloff (Eds.), The many hands of the state: Theorizing political authority and social control. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nedostup, R. (2009). Superstitious regimes: Religion and the politics of Chinese modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.

Palmer, D. A. (2013). From ‘congregations’ to ‘small group community building’: Localizing the Bahá’í faith in Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China. Chinese Sociological Review, 45(2), 78–98.

Palmer, D. A. (2007). Qigong fever. New York: Columbia University Press.

Phipps, K. E. (2009). Marriage and redemption: Mormon polygamy in the congressional imagination, 1862-1887. Virginia Law Review, 95(2), 435–487.

Penny, B. (2012). The religion of Falun gong. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Steinberg, M. W. (2016). Reconfiguring sovereignty in Foucauldian genealogies of power. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(4), 476–502.

Steinmetz, G. (2007). The Devil's handwriting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Steinmetz, G. (1999). Introduction. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), State/culture: State formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Swartz, D. (2013). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Whittaker, D. J. (1984). Early Mormon polygamy defenses. Journal of Mormon History, 11, 43–63.

Yang, F. (2012). Religion in China. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zarrow, P. (2002). The reform movement, the monarchy, and political modernity. In R. Karl & P. Zarrow (Eds.), Rethinking the reform movement of 1898: Political and cultural change in modern China. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.