Reliability of the Heartbeat Tracking Task to Assess Interoception

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 48 - Trang 171-178 - 2022
Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues Santos1, Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy2, Catarina Fernanda Costa Xavier Monteiro de Souza3, Bruna Milene da Silva Mesquita3, Cayque Brietzke4,5, Ítalo Vinícius4, Daniel Carvalho Pereira2, Flávio Oliveira Pires4, Tony Meireles Santos1,3
1Grad Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
2Physical Education Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
3Physical Education Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
4Exercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
5Human Movement Science and Rehabilitation Program, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Interoception refers to the competence in perceiving and interpreting internal sensations emerging from the body. The most common approach to assess interoception is through cardiac interoceptive tests like the heartbeat tracking task (HTT), which measures the accuracy on perceive and counting heartbeats during a period. However, the literature is scarce in providing adequate reliability evidence for this measure so that the interoception assessment may be threaten. In addition to HTT accuracy, it is possible to determine sensibility (self-reported confidence) and interoceptive awareness (correspondence between accuracy and sensibility). Thus, we measured the test–retest reliability of HTT and also investigated the behavior of HTT outcomes along the task. Therefore, 31 healthy adults (16 males) with 27.8 (9.4) years old performed two consecutive HTT interspersed by one day. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference (MD) analyzes showed 'Good' relative reliability for interoceptive accuracy (ICC = 0.880; SEM = 0.263; MD = 0.728; p < 0.001) and 'Moderate' for sensibility (ICC = 0.617; SEM = 0.648; MD = 1.797; p < 0.001) and awareness (ICC = 0.593; SEM = 0.227; MD = 0.628; p < 0.001). The absolute reliability shows low threshold values for observing true effects in HTT outcomes. The results also showed that reducing the number of HTT blocks did not impact the outcomes. The HTT showed to be reliable in determine the interoceptive competences in healthy adults.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arifin, W. N. (2021). Sample size calculator (web). http://wnarifin.github.io

Brener, J., & Ring, C. (2016). Towards a psychophysics of interoceptive processes: the measurement of heartbeat detection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0015

Brewer, R., Cook, R., & Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia: A general deficit of interoception. Royal Society Open Science, 3(10), 150664. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150664

Brietzke, C., Vinícius, Í., Franco-Alvarenga, P. E., Canestri, R., Goethel, M. F., Santos, L. E., Viana, B., Santos, T. M., & Pires, F. O. (2021). Proof-of-concept and test-retest reliability study of psychological and physiological variables of the mental fatigue paradigm. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189532

Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894

Ehlers, A., & Breuer, P. (1992). Increased cardiac awareness in panic disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.371

Herbert, B. M., Herbert, C., & Pollatos, O. (2011). On the relationship between interoceptive awareness and alexithymia: Is interoceptive awareness related to emotional awareness? Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1149–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00717.x

Hill, A., Schücker, L., Hagemann, N., & Strauß, B. (2017). Further evidence for an external focus of attention in running: Looking at specific focus instructions and individual differences. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 39(5), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0272

Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine (auckland, N. Z.), 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001

Kósa, L., Mikó, A., Ferentzi, E., Szabolcs, Z., Bogdány, T., Ihász, F., & Köteles, F. (2021). Body focus and cardioceptive accuracy are not associated with physical performance and perceived fatigue in a sample of individuals with regular physical activity. Psychophysiology, 58(9), e13880. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13880

Larsson, D. E. O., Esposito, G., Critchley, H. D., Dienes, Z., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2021). Sensitivity to changes in rate of heartbeats as a measure of interoceptive ability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 126(5), 1799–1813. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00059.2021

Marcora, S. (2009). Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. Journal of Applied Physiology, 106(6), 2060–2062. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008

McMorris, T. (2020). Cognitive fatigue effects on physical performance: The role of interoception. Sports Medicine (auckland, N. Z.), 50(10), 1703–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01320-w

Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48230.

Murphy, J., Brewer, R., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2017). Interoception and psychopathology: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.12.006

Murphy, J., Brewer, R., Plans, D., Khalsa, S. S., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2020). Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (hove), 73(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819879826

Paolucci, T., Zangrando, F., Iosa, M., De Angelis, S., Marzoli, C., Piccinini, G., & Saraceni, V. M. (2017). Improved interoceptive awareness in chronic low back pain: A comparison of Back school versus Feldenkrais method. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(10), 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1175035

Pollatos, O., Herbert, B. M., Kaufmann, C., Auer, D. P., & Schandry, R. (2007a). Interoceptive awareness, anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity to isometric exercise. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.03.005

Quadt, L., Critchley, H. D., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2018). The neurobiology of interoception in health and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1428(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13915

Rae, C. L., Ahmad, A., Larsson, D. E. O., Silva, M., Praag, C. D. G. V., Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D. (2020). Impact of cardiac interoception cues and confidence on voluntary decisions to make or withhold action in an intentional inhibition task. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 4184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60405-8

Ring, C., & Brener, J. (2018). Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: A comparison of methods to quantify interoception. Psychophysiology, 55(9), e13084. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13084

Ueno, D., Matsuoka, T., Kato, Y., Ayani, N., Maeda, S., Takeda, M., & Narumoto, J. (2020). Individual differences in interoceptive accuracy are correlated with salience network connectivity in older adults. Front Aging Neuroscience, 12, 592002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.592002

van Dyck, Z., Vögele, C., Blechert, J., Lutz, A. P., Schulz, A., & Herbert, B. M. (2016). The water load test as a measure of gastric interoception: Development of a two-stage protocol and application to a healthy female population. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163574

Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1

Wittkamp, M. F., Bertsch, K., Vögele, C., & Schulz, A. (2018). A latent state-trait analysis of interoceptive accuracy. Psychophysiology, 55(6), e13055. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13055