Reliability of 400‐cell and 5‐field leukocyte differential counts for equine bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Veterinary Clinical Pathology - Tập 42 Số 1 - Trang 92-98 - 2013
Nicole Fernandez1, Kent G. Hecker1, Cornelia Gilroy2, Amy L. Warren1, Renaud Léguillette1
1Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada

Tóm tắt

BackgroundReliable enumeration of mast cells and eosinophils in equine bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is important because small increases in the percentages of these cells support the clinical diagnosis of inflammatory airway disease (IAD). Increases in BAL neutrophils also occur with IAD but are not specific due to overlap between IAD and recurrent airway obstruction (RAO).ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a standard 400‐cell leukocyte differential count and an alternate method evaluating 5 microscopic fields at 500× magnification in equine BAL fluid cytocentrifuged preparations.MethodsBAL samples from 60 horses with and without pulmonary inflammation were evaluated using 400‐cell and 5‐field leukocyte differential counting methods. Reliability of enumeration of each leukocyte type was assessed by calculating and comparing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reliability of mast cell enumeration was further evaluated by comparing ICCs of slides with different cell densities.ResultsReliability was higher for all cell types with the 5‐field method; however, overall the difference between methods was not statistically significant. Neutrophil reliability was high (ICC > 0.90) with both methods. Adequate reliability (ICC > 0.85) for mast cells was achieved only with the 5‐field method on slides with higher cell density.ConclusionEnumeration of mast cells is unreliable when the standard 400‐cell differential counting method is used, whereas the 5‐field method on slides with higher cell density reached acceptable reproducibility. Neutrophil percentages were highly reliable with both methods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2460/javma.2000.216.554

10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb02975.x

10.2460/ajvr.67.11.1929

Buechner‐Maxwell V, Proceedings of The Havemeyer Foundation Workshop on Equine Chronic Airway Disease: enlarging the Database

10.2746/042516401776767412

10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0109.x

10.1111/j.2042-3292.1999.tb01566.x

10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb02112.x

10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00150.x

10.1016/S0749-0739(02)00067-6

10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.538

Naylor JM, 1992, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: usefulness of clinical signs, bronchoalveolar lavage, and lung biopsy as diagnostic and prognostic aids, Can Vet J, 33, 591

10.1016/j.cveq.2008.04.003

10.1111/j.2042-3292.1994.tb01136.x

De Brauwer EIGB, 2002, Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid differential count: how many cells should be counted?, Analyt Quant Cytol Histol, 24, 337

10.1183/09031936.01.00203101

10.1183/09031936.96.09030603

10.1097/00000441-199011000-00001

10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00160.x

10.1111/j.1939-1676.2006.tb02871.x

Brauwer EIBG, 2000, Differential cell analysis of cytocentrifuged bronchoalveolar fluid samples affected by the area counted, Analyt Quant Cytol Histol, 22, 143

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.481

Klech H, 1989, Technical recommendations and guidelines for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL): report of the European Society of Pneumology Task Group on BAL, Eur Respir J, 2, 561, 10.1183/09031936.93.02060561

10.2746/042516402776186155

10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00187.x

Soethout EC, 2004, Identification and phenotyping of leukocytes in bovine bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 11, 795

10.1046/j.1439-0442.1999.00210.x

10.1016/S1090-0233(05)80037-1

10.1007/s00580-006-0655-x

10.1007/s00580-008-0772-9

10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00107.x

10.1136/vr.156.21.674

10.1136/jcp.2009.072975

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Tập 42 Số 1

92-98

Thông tin tác giả