Relational risk perception and alliance management in French biotechnology SMEs

Emerald - Tập 17 Số 6 - Trang 532-546 - 2005
HélèneDelerue1
1Laboratoire CREPA, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Purpose

Strategic alliances are often described as risky, dangerous, and instable. When firms adopt these strategies, they are confronted with a relational risk. Nevertheless, little empirical work has been down on relational risk in alliances. For this reason, this research is founded and constructed on two principal questions: what is relational risk? And how is this risk to be managed?

Design/methodology/approach

From a methodological point of view, neither one paradigm nor the other concerning previous research was favoured. The process of the empirical research is based on an inductive non‐demonstrative step. It was carried out in two phases. Firstly, exploratory research was aimed at complementing previous research and formulating hypotheses. These hypotheses were tested with survey data on 87 partnerships of French biotechnology firms.

Findings

The results demonstrate the multidimensional character of relational risk and the duality of relational control. Relational control includes autonomous control and informal control.

Research limitations/implications

Nevertheless, this research adopts a static perspective. It is known that alliances evolve, and develop. Consequently, future research should include the interactive process to understand how these two forms of management – autonomous and informal – evolve and in what cases they complement themselves.

Practical implications

From a managerial point of view, the results emphasize the need to be aware of existing dynamics between systems of control and relational risk perceptions.

Originality/value

This research proposes an empirical study of risk management model in alliance relationships and demonstrates the importance to adopt a multidimensional view of relational risk.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, J. (1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 51, pp. 1‐86.

Brockhoff, K. (1992), “R&D cooperation between firms: a perceived transaction cost perspective”, Management Science, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 514‐24.

Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (1996), “Risk types and inter‐firm alliance structures”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 827‐43.

Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2001), “Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework”, Organization Studies, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 251‐83.

Doz, Y.L. (1996), “The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 55‐83.

Frechet, M. (2002), “Gérer la dynamique relationnelle des partenariats d'innovation: une vision par les Professionnels”, unpublished paper, Centre de Recherche en Gestion IAE de Toulouse.

Froehlicher, T. (1998), “Les liens sociaux entre dirigeants et le déclenchement de la coopération interentreprises”, Finance Contrôle Stratégie, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 99‐124.

Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action and social structure the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 481‐510.

Hagedoorn, J. and Sadowski, B. (1999), “The transition from strategic technology alliances to mergers and acquisitions: an exploratory study”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 87‐107.

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.I. and Black, W.C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition from competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 83‐103.

Ingham, M. and Mothe, C. (2000), “La confiance au sein de coopérations inter‐firmes: une étude de cas”, paper presented at Association Internationale de Management Stratégique Conference, Montpellier.

Jia, J., Dyer, J.S. and John, C.B. (1999), “Measures of perceived risk”, Management Science, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 519‐32.

Jones, C.H., Fladmoe‐Lindquist, W.S. and Borgatti, S.P. (1998), “Professional service constellations: how strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change”, Organization Science, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 396‐410.

Kale, P., Singh, H. and Perlmutter, H. (2000), “Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 217‐37.

Koenig, C. and Van Wijk, G. (1992), “Alliances interentreprises: le rôle de la confiance”, in Noël, A. (Ed.), Perspectives en Management Stratégique, Economica, Paris, pp. 305‐27.

Kumar, R. and Nti, O.K. (1998), “Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model”, Organization Science, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 356‐66.

Madhok, A. (1995), “Opportunism and trust in joint venture relationships: an exploratory study and a model”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 1, pp. 57‐74.

Mjoen, H. and Tallman, S. (1997), “Control and performance in international joint ventures”, Organization Science, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 257‐74.

Nooteboom, B. (1996), “Trust, opportunism, and governance: a process and control model”, Organization studies, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 985‐1010.

Nooteboom, B., Berger, H. and Noorderhaven, N.G. (1997), “Effects of trust and governance on relational risk”, Academy Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 308‐38.

Parkhe, A. (1993), “Strategic alliances structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 794‐829.

Powell, W. (1991), “Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms or organization”, in Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacie, R. and Mitchell, J. (Eds), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, Sage Publications, London, pp. 265‐76.

Ring, P.S. (1996), “Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in economic exchange”, Business & Society, Vol. 35, pp. 148‐75.

Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A. (1992), “Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 483‐98.

Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A. (1994), “Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, pp. 90‐118.

Romelaer, P. (1999), “Relations externes des entreprises et gestion de l'innovation'”, in Foray, D. and Mairesse, J. (Eds), Innovations et Performances: Approaches Interdisciplinaires, EHESS, Paris, pp. 385‐98.

Saxton, T. (1997), “The effect of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 443‐61.

Simonin, B.L. (1999), “Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 595‐623.

Spekman, R., Forbes, T.M., Isabella, L.A. and MacAvoy, T.C. (1998), “Alliance management: a view from the past and a look to the future”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 747‐72.

Wacheux, F. (1996), “Alliances: conséquences stratégiques et organisationnelles”, Revue Française de Gestion, Vol. 108, pp. 12‐24.

Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York, NY.

Williamson, O.E. (1991), “Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 269‐96.

Young‐Ybarra, C.E. and Wiersema, M. (1999), “Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: the influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 439‐59.

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. (1998), “Does trust matter? Exploring the effect of inter organizational and interpersonal trust on performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 9, pp. 141‐59.

Koenig, G. (1989), “Gestion du risque”, in Joffre, P., Simon, Y. and Esnault, J‐M. (Eds), Encyclopédie de Gestion, Economica, Paris, pp. 1497‐510.