Regulation of dome formation in differentiated epithelial cell cultures

Wiley - Tập 12 Số 2 - Trang 259-272 - 1979
Julia E. Lever1
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77025

Tóm tắt

AbstractRat mammary (Rama 25) and dog kidney (MDCK) epithelial cell cultures formed ‘domes’ of cells due to fluid accumulation in focal regions between the culture dish and the cell monolayer. Addition of ouabain caused collapse of domes, suggesting that transport functions were required for maintenance of domes.Dome formation in both epithelial cell lines was stimulated by a broad spectrum of known inducers of erythroid differentiation in Friend erythroleukemia cells. Among these inducers were: (1) polar solvents such as dimethylsulfoxide, dimethylformamide, and hexamethylene bisacetamide; (2) purines such as hypoxanthine, inosine, and adenosine; (3) low‐molecular‐weight fatty acids such as n‐butyrate; and (4) conditions expected to elevate levels of cyclic AMP. In the latter group were activators of adenylate cyclase such as cholera toxin and prostaglandin E1; cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as theophylline and 1‐methyl‐3‐isobutylxanthine; and analogs of cyclic AMP.Induction of domes occurred 15–30 h after addition of inducer to the culture medium. Induction by chemicals was serum‐dependent and required protein synthesis but not DNA synthesis. Induced dome formation was reversible after removal of inducer, requiring the contiuous presence of inducer. Reversal was also observed after either removal of serum or addition of inhibitors of protein synthesis.These results suggest the hypothesis that domes arise in these epithelial cultures by a process that is similar to cell differentiation and is influenced by cyclic AMP.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1126/science.163.3866.472

10.1002/1097-0142(197011)26:5<1022::AID-CNCR2820260509>3.0.CO;2-M

Enami J, 1973, In Vitro, 8, 405

Visser AS, 1974, J Natl Cancer Inst, 52, 293, 10.1093/jnci/52.1.293

10.1093/jnci/53.1.261

10.1016/0092-8674(78)90104-6

10.1073/pnas.73.4.1212

10.1083/jcb.77.3.853

10.1093/icb/15.2.231

Pickett PB, J Cell Biol, 66, 316, 10.1083/jcb.66.2.316

10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.002223

Marks PA, 1978, Hematopoietic Cell Differentiation, 25

10.1016/0006-291X(77)91592-3

LeverJE: In Ross R Sato G (eds): “Cold Spring Harbor Conference on Cell Proliferation ” vol 6. Cold Spring Harbor New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press 1979 p727.

10.1073/pnas.76.3.1323

10.3181/00379727-122-31293

10.1073/pnas.71.7.2908

Harper JF, 1975, J Cyclic Nucleotide Res, 1, 207

10.1016/S0021-9258(18)36039-3

10.1021/bi00789a030

10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03599.x

10.1085/jgp.46.1.167

10.3109/10408417309108394

10.1073/pnas.71.4.1317

Chasin M, 1976, Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide Research, 225

10.1038/272756b0

Terada M, 1978, Cancer Res, 38, 835

10.1038/262360a0

Scher W, 1978, Cancer Res, 38, 841

10.1016/S0021-9258(17)34705-1

Reuben RC, 1978, Oji International Seminar on Genetic Aspects of Friend Virus and Friend Cells

10.1016/0005-2795(77)90119-2

10.1016/0014-4827(79)90578-0

10.1016/0003-9861(74)90073-3

10.1083/jcb.66.2.414

10.1016/0014-4827(79)90580-9

10.1016/0014-4827(76)90036-7

10.1016/S0021-9258(17)34804-4

10.1016/0092-8674(78)90305-7

10.1016/S0021-9258(17)33287-8

10.1002/jcp.1040940109