Reference service without the desk

Reference Services Review - 2010
Theresa S.Arndt1
1Library and Information Services, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis article aims to describe how a college library critically examined its maintenance of a traditional reference desk for in‐person services and changed its service model to suit local needs.Design/methodology/approachThe author examined quantitative and qualitative reference use data prior to changing the service model, and the purpose of reference services was formally articulated. Following the change the author again examined use data, conducted a convenience sample survey, and measured visits to the web site.FindingsThe author came to the conclusion that while maintaining in‐person reference was important for the library, a separate desk was not the best means of providing service at the college. Following the change to the service model, use of reference and consultation services dramatically increased.Originality/valueThe new on‐call, consultative reference service model is described, as is a description of how they managed the change process internally, how they marketed reference services to the students, and how they are assessing the results. Considerations for choosing a reference model appropriate to one's local conditions are outlined.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

ACRL (2000), Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL.

ALA (2008), “ALA Office for Research and Statistics 2008, 3/24/2008‐last update”, Academic Libraries in the United States: Statistical Trends, available at: www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/ors/statsaboutlib/academiclibraries.cfm (accessed 10 July, 2009).

Applegate, R. (2008), “Whose decline? Which academic libraries are ‘deserted’ in terms of reference transactions?”, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 176‐89.

Flanagan, P. and Horowitz, L.R. (2000), “Exploring new service models: can consolidating public service points improve response to customer needs?”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 329‐38.

Foster, N.F. (2007), “The mommy model of service”, in Foster, N.F. and Gibbons, S. (Eds), Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp. 72‐8.

Jastram, I. and Zawistoski, A. (2008), “Personalizing the library via research consultations”, in Steiner, S.K. and Madden, M.L. (Eds), The Desk and beyond: Next Generation Reference Services, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp. 14‐24.

Johnson, B.L. and Alexander, L.A. (2008), “Reaching beyond the walls of the library”, in Steiner, S.K. and Madden, M.L. (Eds), The Desk and beyond: Next Generation Reference Services, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp. 25‐37.

Kuchi, T., Mullen, L.B. and Tama‐Bartels, S. (2004), “Librarians without borders: reaching out to students at a campus center”, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 43 No. 4, p. 310.

Nassar, A. (1997), “An evaluation of the Brandeis model of reference service at a small academic library”, The Reference Librarian, No. 58, pp. 163‐76.

Routt, D., Aldrich, S., Sass, R., Auger, B. and De Groff, A. (2008), “Dangerous ideas. What if libraries …”, paper presented at PLA 2008 National Conference, Public Library Association, Chicago, IL.

Ryan, S.M. (2008), “Reference transactions analysis: the cost‐effectiveness of staffing a traditional academic reference desk”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 389‐99.

Zamostny, J. (2008), “Sheep in Wolves' clothing: undergrads at the reference desk”, Library Journal, Vol. 133 No. 11, p. 92.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Reference Services Review

Thông tin tác giả