Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours

Public Health Nutrition - Tập 21 Số 10 - Trang 1835-1844 - 2018
Roni Neff1,2,3, Danielle Edwards1,3, Anne Palmer1,4, Rebecca Ramsing1, Allison Righter5, Julia A. Wolfson6
1Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
4Department of health, behavior & society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
5School of Culinary Science & Nutrition, The Culinary Institute of America, Hyde Park, NY, USA
6Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjective

Excess meat consumption, particularly of red and processed meats, is associated with nutritional and environmental health harms. While only a small portion of the population is vegetarian, surveys suggest many Americans may be reducing their meat consumption. To inform education campaigns, more information is needed about attitudes, perceptions, behaviours and foods eaten in meatless meals.

Design

A web-based survey administered in April 2015 assessed meat reduction behaviours, attitudes, what respondents ate in meatless meals and sociodemographic characteristics.

Setting

Nationally representative, web-based survey in the USA.

Subjects

US adults (n1112) selected from GfK Knowledgeworks’ 50 000-member online panel. Survey weights were used to assure representativeness.

Results

Two-thirds reported reducing meat consumption in at least one category over three years, with reductions of red and processed meat most frequent. The most common reasons for reduction were cost and health; environment and animal welfare lagged. Non-meat reducers commonly agreed with statements suggesting that meat was healthy and ‘belonged’ in the diet. Vegetables were most often consumed ‘always’ in meatless meals, but cheese/dairy was also common. Reported meat reduction was most common among those aged 45–59 years and among those with lower incomes.

Conclusions

The public and environmental health benefits of reducing meat consumption create a need for campaigns to raise awareness and contribute to motivation for change. These findings provide rich information to guide intervention development, both for the USA and other high-income countries that consume meat in high quantities.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.026

10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663286

10.1016/j.jada.2009.02.029

10.1017/S136898001700026X

10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002

10.1086/664970

10.3945/an.116.012567

ChooseMyPlate.gov (2016) All about the protein foods group. How much food from the protein foods group is needed daily? http://www.choosemyplate.gov/protein-foods (accessed February 2018).

Garnett, 2017, Grazed and Confused? Ruminating on Cattle, Grazing Systems, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, the Soil Carbon Sequestration Question – and What It All Means for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001

Mejia, 2016, The future of meat: exploring the nutritional qualities and environmental impacts of meat replacements, FASEB J, 30, 894.8, 10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.894.8

10.1017/S1368980015003778

10.1017/S1368980015003055

10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002

10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025

Stahler C (2015) How often do Americans eat vegetarian meals? And how many adults in the US are vegetarian? http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2011issue4/vj2011issue4poll.php (accessed February 2018).

10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047

10.1017/S1368980014002377

Gerber, 2013, Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock. A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities

10.3945/ajcn.111.018978

10.1017/S1368980015002062

10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002

2015, 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

Zaraska, 2016, Meathooked: The History and Science of Our 2.5-Million-Year Obsession with Meat

10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.014

10.1056/NEJMoa1307352

Barclay E & Aubrey A (2016) Eat less meat, we’re told. But Americans’ habits are slow to change. The Salt, 26 February. http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/02/26/465431695/eat-less-meat-were-told-but-americans-habits-are-slow-to-change (accessed February 2018).

Dibb, 2014, Let’s Talk about Meat: Changing Dietary Behaviour for the 21st Century

10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6

10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1

Anon. (2012) Thomson Reuters–NPR Health Poll: Meat Consumption 2012, March 2012. https://truvenhealth.com/portals/0/NPR-Truven-Health-Poll/NPR_report_MeatConsumption_1203.pdf (accessed February 2018).

2014, FGI Survey Report 2014 Monday Effect Online Panel

10.1017/S1368980015000567

10.3945/ajcn.2009.28713

Sawyer W (2016) Chickens, cows and pigs … oh my! Implications of record US protein expansion. https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/animal-protein/chicken-cows-and-pigs-oh-my.html (accessed February 2018).

10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.019

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) FAOSTAT data, Food Balance Sheets. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed September 2017).

Pan, 2012, Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies, Arch Intern Med, 172, 555, 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977

D’Adamo, 2014, Soy foods and supplementation: a review of commonly perceived health benefits and risks, Altern Ther Health Med, 20, 39