Reconsidering frameworks of Alzheimer's dementia when assessing psychosocial outcomes

Joseph E. Gaugler1, Lisa J. Bain2, Lauren Mitchell3, Jessica Finlay4, Sam Fazio5, Eric Jutkowitz6
1Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
2The Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA
3Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
4Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI USA
5Care and Support, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA
6Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe purpose of this introductory article to the special issue on psychosocial outcome measures in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions is to outline new frameworks to more effectively capture and measure the full range of how people living with Alzheimer's dementia and their family caregivers experience the disease process. Specifically, we consider the strengths and weaknesses of alternative perspectives, including person‐centered, strength‐based, and resilience‐focused approaches that may complement and extend the dominant deficit paradigm to reflect the entirety of the dementia experience. Our aim is to encourage innovative methods to measure psychosocial aspects of Alzheimer's dementia and caregiving that have not yet received sufficient attention, including resources (e.g., services and supports) and positive caregiver and care recipient outcomes (e.g., positive mood and adaptation).

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alzheimer's Disease International.Dementia Statistics Available at:https://www.alz.co.uk/research/statistics 2018 Accessed October 8 2018 Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.National plans to address Alzheimer's disease Available at:https://aspe.hhs.gov/national‐plans‐address‐alzheimers‐disease 2018 Accessed October 8 2018 Alzheimer's Association, 2018, 2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures, Alzheimer's Demen, 14, 701, 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001 10.1080/09687590120035807 10.1111/jar.12378 U. S. Department of Health & Human Services.National research summit on care services and supports for persons with dementia and their caregivers (Day 1) Available at:https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=26257&bhcp=1 2017Accessed October 8 2018. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services.National research summit on care services and supports for persons with dementia and their caregivers (Day 2) Available at:https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=26261&bhcp=1 2017Accessed October 8 2018. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00342.x Dodge M.D., 2010, Long‐term management of dementia 10.1080/00332747.1963.11023339 Butler R., 1975, Why Survive? Being Old in America 10.1136/bmj.2.4329.822 10.1136/bmj.2.4685.921 10.1001/jama.2010.1253 10.1093/geront/gnp087 Gitlin L.N., 2018, Better Living with Dementia JPND ‐ EU Joint Programme ‐ Neurodegenerative Disease Research.Dementia Outcome Measures: Charting New Territory.2015 Staudinger U.M., 1995, Resilience and reserve capacity in later adulthood: potentials and limits of development across the life span, Developmental Psychopathology, 2, 801 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398786.013.013.0002 Wehmeyer M.L., 2013, Disability, disorder, and identity, Intellect Dev Disabil, 51, 122, 10.1352/1934-9556-51.2.122 10.1352/1934-9556-47.4.307 Rowe J.W., 1998, Successful Aging 10.1093/geront/37.4.433 10.1093/geront/gnu027 Cumming E.E., 1961, Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement 10.1093/geront/gnu044 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50324.x 10.1017/S1041610213002287 10.1080/03601277.2010.500587 10.1177/0164027516656040 Wahl H.W., 2009, The home environment and disability‐related outcomes in aging individuals: what is the empirical evidence?, Gerontologist, 49, 335 Wahl H.W., 2003, Aging Independently: Living Arrangements and Mobility 10.1093/geront/gnr154 Wahl H.W., 2018, The Cambridge Handbook of Successful Aging Mejía S.T., 2017, Successful aging as the intersection of individual resources, age, environment, and experiences of well‐being in daily activities, J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 72, 279 J.M.Finlay J.E.Gaugler andR.L.Kane.Ageing in the margins: expectations of and struggles for ‘a good place to grow old’ among low‐income older Minnesotans.Ageing & Society 2018;1–25 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.010 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.024 Cho J., 2014, Successful aging and subjective well‐being among oldest‐old adults, Gerontologist, 55, 132, 10.1093/geront/gnu074 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.01.002 Cheng S.‐T., 2015, Successful Aging: Asian Perspectives, 10.1007/978-94-017-9331-5 10.1093/geront/gnr006 10.1007/s10823-012-9171-4 10.1177/104420730201200402 10.1093/geront/gnu081 Solomon P., 2018, ‘I'm still here, I'm still alive’: understanding successful aging in the context of HIV, Int J STD AIDS, 29, 172, 10.1177/0956462417721439 Y.I.Hwang K.‐R.Foley andJ.N.Trollor.Aging well on the autism spectrum: an examination of the dominant model of successful aging.J Autism Developmental Disord 2018;1–10 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2004.00136.x 10.2190/AG.73.4.c 10.1093/geront/gnu037 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52056.x Rowe J.W., 2015, Successful aging 2.0: conceptual expansions for the 21st century, J Gerontol Ser B, 70, 593, 10.1093/geronb/gbv025 Society MFRNoaA, 2010, Policies and politics for an aging America, Contexts, 9, 22, 10.1525/ctx.2010.9.1.22 L.N.Gitlin andK.Maslow.National Research Summit on Care Services and Supports for Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers: Report to the National Advisory Council on Alzheimer's Research Care and Services.2018 Washington D.C. Tesch‐Romer C., 2017, Toward a more comprehensive concept of successful aging: disability and care needs, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 72, 310 Masten A.S., 2009, The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology 10.1093/geronb/62.1.P38 Joling K.J., 2016, Factors of resilience in informal caregivers of people with dementia from integrative international data analysis, Demen Geriatr Cogn Disord, 42, 198, 10.1159/000449131 Ballenger J.F., 2017, Framing confusion: dementia, society, and history, AMA J Ethics, 19, 713, 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.7.mhst1-1707 10.1017/S0144686X97006570 Alzheimer's Society, 2014, Dementia 2014: Opportunity for Change 10.1177/0733464815581485 10.1093/geront/gnr010 Lyons R.F., 1995, Relationships in Chronic Illness and Disability 10.1016/j.jaging.2008.01.002 10.1177/153331750401900311 Thomas C., 1999, Female forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability 10.1093/geronb/gbv034 Groen‐van de Ven L., 2017, Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision‐making concerning daycare, BMJ Open, 7, e018337, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337 10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.005 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00471-2 10.1017/S095925980400108X 10.2147/CIA.S38589 10.1080/13607869757344 Mitchell G., 2015, Person‐centred care for people with dementia: Kitwood reconsidered, Nurs Stand, 30, 10.7748/ns.30.7.46.s47 10.1093/geront/gnx122 10.2147/CIA.S117637 Epp T., 2003, Person‐centred dementia care: a vision to be refined, Can Alzheimer Dis Rev, 5, 14 10.1111/jgs.13936 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0966 The Boston Consulting Group.Care and Support Strategic Assessment Presented Alzheimer's Assoc November 9 20152015 10.1111/hex.12799 10.1080/13607863.2016.1254596 D.Gove A.Diaz‐Ponce J.Georges E.Moniz‐Cook G.Mountain andR.Chattat et al.Alzheimer Europe's position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement).Aging Ment Health 2017;1–7 10.1093/geront/gnx182 10.1093/geront/23.4.349 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.003 10.1192/bjp.183.3.248