Reading, linguistic, and metacognitive skills: are they reciprocally related past the first school years?

Arnesen, A., Braeken, J., Baker, S. K., Meek-Hansen, W., Ogden, T., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2017). Growth in oral reading fluency in a semitransparent orthography: Concurrent and predictive relations with reading proficiency in Norwegian, Grades 2–5. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.159

Baker, D. L., Stoolmiller, M., Good, R. H., & Baker, S. K. (2011). Effect of reading comprehension on passage fluency in Spanish and English for second-grade English learners. School Psychology Review, 40(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2011.12087702

Baker, L., DeWyngaert, L. U., & Zeliger–Kandasamy, A. (2015). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: New directions. In S. R. Parris, & K. Headley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 72–87). The Guilford Press

Benson, N. (2008). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and reading achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907301424

Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Trivedi, P., Olson, E., Gould, L., Hiramatsu, S. … Westhaggen, S. Y. (2010). Applying the multiple dimensions of reading fluency to assessment and instruction. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909336083

Botsas, G. (2017). Differences in strategy use in the reading comprehension of narrative and science texts among students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428

Braze, D., Katz, L., Magnuson, J. S., Mencl, W. E., Tabor, W., Van Dyke, J. A. … Shankweiler, D. P. (2016). Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage

Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge

Cadime, I., Rodrigues, B., Santos, S., Viana, F. L., Chaves-Sousa, S., Cosme, M. C., & Ribeiro, I. (2017). The role of word recognition, oral reading fluency and listening comprehension in the simple view of reading: A study in an intermediate depth orthography. Reading and Writing, 30(3), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9691-3

Clemens, N. H., Simmons, D., Simmons, L. E., Wang, H., & Kwok, O. (2017). The prevalence of reading fluency and vocabulary difficulties among adolescents struggling with reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(8), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916662120

Decree-Law No. 54/2018 of July 6 (2018). Diário Da República: I Série, n.o129, 2918–2928. https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/decreto-lei/54-2018-115652961

Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T. … Francis, D. J. (2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546

Fernandes, S., Querido, L., Verhaeghe, A., Marques, C., & Araújo, L. (2017). Reading development in European Portuguese: Relationships between oral reading fluency, vocabulary and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 1987–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9763-z

Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6

Frid, B., & Friesen, D. C. (2020). Reading comprehension and strategy use in fourth- and fifth-grade French immersion students. Reading and Writing, 33(5), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10004-5

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3

Gebauer, S. K., Zaunbauer, A. C. M., & Möller, J. (2013). Cross-language transfer in English immersion programs in Germany: Reading comprehension and reading fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.002

Goff, D. A., Pratt, C., & Ong, B. (2005). The relations between children’s reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0

Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Erlbaum

Gregg, M., & Sekeres, D. C. (2006). Supporting children’s Reading of expository text in the geography classroom. The Reading Teacher, 60(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.60.2.1

Hagtvet, B. E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing, 16(6), 505–539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025521722900

Hogan, T. P., Adlof, S. M., & Alonzo, C. N. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.904441

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2020a). Overview of the cognitive foundations framework. In The cognitive foundations of reading and its acquisition: A framework with applications connecting teaching and learning (pp. 13–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44195-1

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2020b). Summary of the Cognitive Foundations Framework. The cognitive foundations of reading and its acquisition: A framework with applications connecting teaching and learning (pp. 85–88). Springer

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2020c). Understanding reading development and difficulty. In The cognitive foundations of reading and its acquisition: A framework with applications connecting teaching and learning (pp. 89–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44195-1

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Sage

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B., & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719

Kim, Y. S. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.107

Kim, Y. S. G., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74

Kim, Y. S. G., & Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1007375

Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press

Law, Y. K. (2009). The role of attribution beliefs, motivation and strategy use in Chinese fifth-graders’ reading comprehension. Educational Research, 51(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802704764

Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It’s simple, but complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12861

Li, L., Zhu, D., & Wu, X. (2021). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on reading comprehension in middle childhood: The mediator role of listening comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(4), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1809585

Liao, X., Zhu, X., & Zhao, P. (2021). The mediating effects of reading amount and strategy use in the relationship between intrinsic reading motivation and comprehension: Differences between grade 4 and grade 6 students. Reading and Writing, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10218-6

Little, C. W., Hart, S. A., Quinn, J. M., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Taylor, J., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Exploring the co-development of reading fluency and reading comprehension: A twin study. Child Development, 88(3), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12670

McMaster, K. L., Espin, C. A., & Van Den Broek, P. (2014). Making connections: Linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12026

McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 465–496). Erlbaum

Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890

Muijselaar, M. M. L., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The effects of updating ability and knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.011

Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén

Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 338–355). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In J. Margaret, Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 248–265). Blackwell

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office

Nese, J. F. T., Biancarosa, G., Anderson, D., Lai, C. F., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2012). Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: A comparison of models. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 887–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0

Nese, J. F. T., Biancarosa, G., Cummings, K., Kennedy, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). In search of average growth: Describing within-year oral reading fluency growth across Grades 1–8. Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.006

Ouellette, G. P., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1

Padeliadu, S., & Antoniou, F. (2014). The relationship between reading comprehension, decoding, and fluency in Greek: A cross-sectional study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.758932

Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 18(3), 185–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271970180301

Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). John Benjamins Publishing Company

Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642

Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield, & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp. 249–284). Academic Press

Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G. (2013). The role of vocabulary in the context of the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29, 168–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.758569

Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063

Ribeiro, I., Dias, O., Oliveira, Í. M., Miranda, P., Ferreira, G., Saraiva, M., Paulo, R., & Cadime, I. (2015). Adaptação e validação da escala Reading Strategy Use para a população portuguesa. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 1(40), 25–36

Ribeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. L. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency, and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12095

Rodrigues, B., Cadime, I., Viana, F. L., & Ribeiro, I. (2020). Developing and validating tests of reading and listening comprehension for fifth and sixth grade students in Portugal. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article ID 610876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.610876

Rodrigues, B., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., Choupina, C., Baptista, A., Viana, F. L., & Ribeiro, I. (2022). Assessing oral reading fluency within and across grade levels: Development of equated test forms. Behavior Research Methods, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01806-7

Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in Grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173605

Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x

Sanacore, J., & Palumbo, A. (2008). Understanding the fourth-grade slump: Our point of view. The Educational Forum, 73(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720802539648

Santos, S., Viana, F. L., Ribeiro, I., Prieto, G., Brandão, S., & Cadime, I. (2015). Development of listening comprehension tests with narrative and expository texts for Portuguese students. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(e5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.7

Santos, S., Cadime, I., Viana, F. L., Prieto, G., Chaves-Sousa, S., Spinillo, A. G., & Ribeiro, I. (2016). An application of the Rasch model to reading comprehension measurement. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(38), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0044-6

Santos, S., Cadime, I., Viana, F. L., Chaves-Sousa, S., Gayo, E., Maia, J., & Ribeiro, I. (2017). Assessing reading comprehension with narrative and expository texts: Dimensionality and relationship with fluency, vocabulary and memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12335

Santos, S., Cadime, I., Viana, F. L., & Ribeiro, I. (2020). Cross-lagged relations among linguistic skills in European Portuguese: A longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.261

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74

Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0

Shapiro, E. S., Solari, E., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Use of a measure of reading comprehension to enhance prediction on the state high stakes assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.002

Silberglitt, B., Burns, M. K., Madyun, N. H., & Lail, K. E. (2006). Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levels. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20175

Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Children’s reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4114-x

Swart, N. M., Muijselaar, M. M. L., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., de Jong, P. F., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders. Reading and Writing, 30(3), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9686-0

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x

Tobia, V., & Bonifacci, P. (2015). The simple view of reading in a transparent orthography: The stronger role of oral comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9556-1

Torppa, M., Georgiou, G. K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Niemi, P., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2016). Examining the simple view of reading in a transparent orthography: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 3. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 62(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.2.0179

Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685

Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.3.1

Van Ammel, K., & Van Keer, H. (2021). Skill or will? The respective contribution of motivational and behavioural characteristics to secondary school students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12356

Van Kraayenoord, C. E., Beinicke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2012). Word identification, metacognitive knowledge, motivation and reading comprehension: An Australian study of grade 3 and 4 pupils. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 51–68

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1417

Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp

Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1805–1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9346-3

Verhoeven, L., Van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536125

Viana, F. L., Santos, S., Ribeiro, I., Chaves-Sousa, S., Brandão, S., Cadime, I., & Maia, J. (2015). Listening comprehension assessment: Validity studies of two vertically scaled tests for Portuguese students. Universitas Psychologica, 14(1), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-1.lcav

Webb, S. (2021). Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(2), 278–293. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/

Wechsler, D. (2003). Escala de Inteligência de Wechsler para Crianças – Terceira edição (WISC–III) [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Third Edition]. CEGOC

Wolfgramm, C., Suter, N., & Göksel, E. (2016). Examining the role of concentration, vocabulary and self-concept in listening and reading comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 30(1–2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1065746

Wong, Y. K. (2021). Developmental relations between listening and reading comprehension in young chinese language learners: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9619-y

Yildirim, K., Ates, S., Çetinkaya, F., & Kaya-Tosun, D. (2019). The relations between reading comprehension and reading fluency: Their reciprocal roles as an indicator and predictor. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 9(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2019.92.2

Yildirim, K., Rasinski, T., & Kaya, D. (2019). Fluency and comprehension of narrative texts in Turkish students in grades 4 through 8. Education 3–13, 47(3), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1449880

Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00014.x