Reading and listening comprehension and their relation to inattention and hyperactivity

British Journal of Educational Psychology - Tập 84 Số 1 - Trang 108-124 - 2014
Kate Cain1, Simon Bignell2
1Lancaster University, UK
2University of Derby, UK

Tóm tắt

BackgroundChildren with diagnoses of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) frequently have reading problems. To date, it is not clear whether poor reading is associated with both inattention and hyperactivity and also whether poor reading comprehension is the result of poor word reading skills or more general language comprehension weaknesses.AimsWe report two studies to examine how reading and listening comprehension skills are related to inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity.SamplesSeparate groups of 7‐ to 11‐year‐olds participated in each study.MethodsIn both studies, we used teacher ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity to identify three groups at risk of ADHD: poor attention, high hyperactivity, poor attention and high hyperactivity, and also same‐age controls. In Study 1, we explored how inattention and hyperactivity predicted reading after controlling for non‐verbal IQ and vocabulary. In Study 2, we compared listening and reading comprehension in these groups.ResultsPoor attention was related to poor reading comprehension, although the relation was partially mediated by word reading skill (Study 1). Groups with high hyperactivity had weak listening comprehension relative to reading comprehension (Study 2).ConclusionsThese results indicate that the reading comprehension problems of children with attention difficulties are related to poor word reading and that listening comprehension is particularly vulnerable in children at risk of ADHD.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/00222194020350050301

10.1348/026151001166083

10.1111/j.1469‐8749.2009.03603.x

American Psychological Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

10.1080/87565649909540750

10.1037/0033‐2909.121.1.65

10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

10.1111/j.1469‐7610.2004.00343.x

10.1111/j.1469‐7610.2006.01710.x

10.1177/1087054709347197

10.1348/026151006X171343

10.1177/108705479600100305

10.1080/09658210600624481

10.1348/000709905X67610

10.1037/0022‐0663.96.4.671

10.1037/0022‐0663.96.1.31

10.1111/j.1469‐7610.2004.00366.x

Cohen J., 1983, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences

10.1016/S1041-6080(01)00033-4

10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03

Dunn L. M., 1997, British Picture Vocabulary Scale

Elliott C. D., 1996, British ability scales: Second edition

10.1177/00222194070400010401

10.1177/00222194070400010401

10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.003

10.1007/s10803‐008‐0587‐1

10.1002/dys.285

10.1177/074193258600700104

10.1037/0033‐2909.111.1.127

10.1007/BF00401799

10.1111/j.1467‐9817.2006.00293.x

10.1348/978185408X369020

Kintsch W., 1998, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition

10.1080/87565649509540621

10.1044/1058-0360.0603.71

10.1037/0022‐0663.91.2.273

10.1111/1469‐7610.00228

10.1111/j.1469‐7610.1986.tb00185.x

10.1023/A:1023895602957

10.1037/0021‐843X.110.1.40

10.1037/0012‐1649.40.5.665

Naglieri J. A., 1985, The matrix analogies test: short form

10.1111/j.1467‐9817.2004.00238.x

Neale M. D., 1997, The Neale analysis of reading ability – revised (NARA‐II)

10.1080/10888438.2010.529219

10.1080/01690960344000008

10.1080/17470210600917850

10.1111/j.1469‐7610.1996.tb01380.x

Perfetti C. A., 1985, Reading ability

10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

10.1177/08830738950100S111

10.3758/BF03208254

10.1177/088307389801301005

Ullmann R. K., 1999, The ADD‐H Comprehensive Teacher's Rating Scale (ACTeRS)

10.1177/1087054708326111

10.1348/000712601162239

10.1177/002221940003300206

10.1207/s15326942dn2701_3