Raising the standards by standardization?

Barbé, J., Espinoza, L., & Gellert, U. (under review). Modifications of the mathematics curriculum over the last two decades in Chile: effects on school mathematical practice. Damerow, P., Dunkley, M. E., Nebres, B. F., & Werry, B. (Eds.). (1984). Mathematics for All: Problems of Cultural Selectivity and Unequal Distribution of Mathematical Education and Future Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching for the Majority. UNESCO. Gellert, U. (2017). Revisiting mathematics for all: A commentary to Pais’s critique. In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann, & A. Pais (Eds.), The Disorder of Mathematics Education: Challenging the Sociopolitical Dimension of Research (pp. 67–87). Springer. Krauss, S., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., Jordan, A., & Löwen, K. (2004). COACTIV: Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule. Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (pp. 31–53). Münster: Waxmann. Li, H., & Li, N. (2018). Features and characteristics of Chinese new century mathematics textbooks. In Y. Cao & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The 21st Century Mathematics Education in China (pp. 171–192). Springer. Yuan, H., & Huang, X. (2019). China-England mathematics teacher exchange and its impact. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(3), 480–508.