RE-COVER project: A survey on resilience, mental health, and fear of Covid-19 in four countries

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 14 - Trang 1-4 - 2021
Daichi Sugawara1, Yuan Gu2, Akihiro Masuyama3, Siew Li Ng4, Evone Y. M. Phoo4, Raja Intan Arifah Binti Raja Reza Shah5, Takahiro Kubo6, Yuta Chishima1, Eugene Y. J. Tee4
1Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
2Department of Public Administration, Humanities and Arts, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
3Faculty of Psychology, Iryo Sosei University, Iwaki, Japan
4Department of Psychology, HELP University, Shah Alam, Malaysia
5Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
6Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Bunkyo-ku, Japan

Tóm tắt

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the mental health of people worldwide. Psychological resilience has been shown to buffer against the threat of the pandemic (i.e., COVID-19 fear) and sustain mental health. The extent to which psychological resilience factors impact mental health maintenance, however, is unclear, given broad differences in infection rates, prevention approaches, government interventions across different cultures and contexts. Our study examines resilience factors and how they protect individuals from COVID-19-related fear and sustain their mental health. Data were collected from 1583 (Mage = 32.22, SD = 12.90, Range = 19–82) respondents from Japan, China, the United States, and Malaysia between October to November 2020. We collected data across age and sex, marital status, number of children, and occupations. We also accounted for stay-at-home measures, change in income, COVID-19 infection status, place of residence, and subjective social status in the study. Our variables included mental health-related and resilience constructs, namely (i) fear of COVID-19, (ii) depression, anxiety, and stress; (iii) present, past, and future life satisfaction, (iv) sense of control, (v) positive emotions, (vi) ego-resilience, (vii) grit, (viii) self-compassion, (ix) passion, and (x) relational mobility. All questionnaires were assessed for their suitability across the four countries with the necessary translation checks. Results from this study can be instrumental in examining the impact of multiple resilience factors and their interaction with demographic variables in shaping mental health outcomes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation reports. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19---1-march-2021(2021). Accessed 2 Mar 2021. Tianchen W, Xiaoqian J, Huifeng S, Jieqiong N, Xiaohan Y, Jialei X, Xiaoli W. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;281:91–8. Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987;57:316–31. Kubo T, Sugawara D, Masuyama A. The effect of ego-resiliency and COVID-19-related stress on mental health among the Japanese population. Pers Individ Differ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110702. Fredrickson B, Tugade M, Waugh C, Samanez-Larkin G. What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:365–76. Masten AS. Pathways to integrated resilience science. Psychol Inq. 2015;26:187–96. Ungar M. Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013;14:255–66. Block J, Kremen AM. IQ and ego resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:349–61. Chen X, He J, Fan X. Applicability of the Ego-Resilience Scale (ER89) in the Chinese cultural context: a validation study. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2019;38:675–91. Hata U, Onodera A. Development and validation of a Japanese version of the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89). Jpn J Pers. 2013;22:37–47. Dan Gao. How does Social Class Influence Mate Preference?一Perceived Control of Mediating Effect and Lay Theories about Social Class of Moderated Effect. Master’s thesis. Northwest Normal University. 2019 Ryff C D, Kitayama S, Karasawa M, Markus H, Kawakami N, Coe C. Survey of Midlife in Japan (MIDJA), April-September 2008. ICPSR30822-v3. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2018; https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30822.v3 Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:763–73. Shiota MN, Keltner D, John OP. Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with big five personality and attachment style. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1:61–71. Sugawara D, Arimitsu K, Sugie M. Development of the Japanese version of dispositional positive emotion scales. J Health Psychol Res. 2020;33:1–9. Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR. Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92:1087–101. Takehashi H, Higuchi O, Ozaki Y, Watanabe T, Toyosawa J. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Grit Scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2019;89:580–90. Zhong C, Wang MC, Shou Y, Ren F, Zhang X, Li M, Yang W. Assessing construct validity of the Grit-S in Chinese employees. PloS ONE. 2018;13:e0209319. Arimitsu K. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the self-compassion scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2014;85:50–9. Chen J, Yan LS, Zhou LH. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Self-compassion Scale. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2011;19:734–6. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003;2:223–50. Kubo T, Sawamiya Y. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the passion scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2018;89:490–9. Zhao Y, St-Louis A, Vallerand RJ. On the validation of the passion scale in Chinese. Psychol Well Being. 2015;5:3. Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C, Mageau GA, Koestner R, Ratelle C, Léonard M, Gagné M, Marsolais J. Les passions de l’ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:756–67. Antony M, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and community a sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:176–81. Moussa MT, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the short Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS21). Report for New South Wales Transcultural Mental Health Centre, Cumberland Hospital, 2001. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995. Prenda KM, Lachman ME. Planning for the future: a life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychol Aging. 2001;16:206–16. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. Chang KC, Hou WL, Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Griffiths MD. Psychometric testing of three COVID-19-related scales among people with mental illness. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00361-6. Masuyama A, Kubo T, Sugawara D, Yuta C. Interest consistency can buffer the effect of COVID-19 fear on psychological distress. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00564-5. Yuki M, Schug J. Psychological consequences of relational mobility. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;32:129–32. Sugawara D, Gu Y, Masuyama A, Ng SL, Phoo EYM, Shah RIABRR, Kubo T, et al., RE-COVER: REsilience for COVid-19 in Each Region [Data Collection], Open Science Framework https://osf.io/p56ga/ Krosnick JA. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1991;5:213–36.