Quality of Care in Humanitarian Surgery
Tóm tắt
Humanitarian surgical programs are set up de novo, within days or hours in emergency or disaster settings. In such circumstances, insuring quality of care is extremely challenging. Basic structural inputs such as a safe structure, electricity, clean water, a blood bank, sterilization equipment, a post-anesthesia recovery unit, appropriate medications should be established. Currently, no specific credentials are needed for surgeons to operate in a humanitarian setting; the training of more humanitarian surgeons is desperately needed. Standard perioperative protocols for the humanitarian setting after common procedures such as Cesarean section, burn care, open fractures, and amputations and antibiotic prophylaxis, and post-operative pain management must be developed. Outcome data, especially long-term outcomes, are difficult to collect as patients often do not return for follow-up and may be difficult to trace; standard databases for post-operative infections and mortality rates should be established. Checklists have recently received significant attention as an instrument to support the improvement of surgical quality; knowing which items are most applicable to humanitarian settings remains unknown. In conclusion, the quality of surgical services in humanitarian settings must be regulated. Many other core medical activities of humanitarian organizations such as therapeutic feeding, mass vaccination, and the treatment of infectious diseases, such as tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus, are subject to rigorous reporting of quality indicators. There is no reason why surgery should be exempted from quality oversight. The surgical humanitarian community should pull together before the next disaster strikes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ (2004) Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 198:626–632
McQueen KA, Parmar P, Kene M et al (2009) Burden of surgical disease: strategies to manage an existing public health emergency. Prehosp Disaster Med 24(Suppl 2):s228–s231
Chu K (2009) General surgeons: a dying breed? Arch Surg 144:498–499
Bilimoria KY, Phillips JD, Rock CE et al (2009) Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1799–1808
Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD, Upchurch GR Jr (2005) Measuring surgical quality: what’s the role of provider volume? World J Surg 29:1217–1221
Rogo-Gupta LJ, Lewin SN, Kim JH et al (2010) The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 116:1341–1347
Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC et al (2008) Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol 180:820–828 discussion 828–829
The Joint Commission (2010, Nov 23) Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/
Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL et al (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267
Chu KM, Ford N, Trelles M (2010) Operative mortality in resource-limited settings: the experience of Medecins Sans Frontieres in 13 countries. Arch Surg 145:721–725
Ginzburg E, O’Neill WW, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ et al (2010) Rapid medical relief: project Medishare and the Haitian earthquake. N Engl J Med 362:e31
MacIntyre NR, Jeffcoat DM, Chan DB et al (2010) The experiences of a surgical response team in Haiti. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:172–201
Merin O, Ash N, Levy G et al (2010) The Israeli field hospital in Haiti: ethical dilemmas in early disaster response. N Engl J Med 362:e38
Peranteau WH, Havens JM, Harrington S et al (2010) Re-establishing surgical care at Port-au-Prince General Hospital, Haiti. J Am Coll Surg 211:126–130
Sullivan SR, Taylor HO, Pauyo T et al (2010) Surgeons’ dispatch from Cange, Haiti. N Engl J Med 362:e19
Bickler SW, Spiegel D (2010) Improving surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: a pivotal role for the World Health Organization. World J Surg 34:386–390
WHO (2011, Jan 10) Tool for situational analysis to assess emergency and essential surgical care. Available from: http://www.who.int/surgery/publications/QuickSitAnalysisEESCsurvey.pdf
Kushner AL, Cherian MN, Noel L et al (2010) Addressing the Millennium Development Goals from a surgical perspective: essential surgery and anesthesia in 8 low- and middle-income countries. Arch Surg 145:154–159
Choo S, Perry H, Hesse AA et al (2010) Assessment of capacity for surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia in 17 Ghanaian hospitals using a WHO assessment tool. Trop Med Int Health Jul 14 [Epub ahead of print]
De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM et al (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499
Birkmeyer JD (2010) Strategies for improving surgical quality: checklists and beyond. N Engl J Med 363:1963–1965
Birkmeyer JD, Miller DC (2009) Surgery: can checklists improve surgical outcomes? Nat Rev Urol 6:245–246
Sana EM (2010) Implementation of the WHO safe surgery checklist in Tunisia: followed steps and learned lessons. In: International forum on quality and safety in healthcare. WHO, Nice, France