Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process
Tóm tắt
Despite lab-based evidence supporting the argument that double standards—by which one group is unfairly held to stricter standards than another—explain observed gender differences in evaluations, it remains unclear whether double standards also affect evaluations in organization and market contexts, where competitive pressures create a disincentive to discriminate. Using data from a field study of investment professionals sharing recommendations on an online platform, and drawing on status theory, we identify the conditions under which double standards in multistage evaluations contribute to unequal outcomes for men and women. We find that double standards disadvantaging women are most likely when evaluators face heightened search costs related to the number of candidates being compared or higher levels of uncertainty stemming from variation in the amount of pertinent information available. We rule out that systematic gender differences in the actions or characteristics of the investment professionals being evaluated are driving these results. By more carefully isolating the role of this status-based mechanism of discrimination for perpetuating gender inequality, this study identifies not only whether but also the conditions under which gender-based double standards lead to a female disadvantage, even when relevant and objective information about performance is readily available.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alden W. 2013 “Returns at hedge funds run by women beat the industry, report says.” DealBook. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/returns-at-hedge-funds-run-by-women-beat-the-industry-report-says/.
Arrow K. 1971 Some Models of Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation: 1–54.
Becker G. S. 1957 The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berger J. 1977 Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific.
Botelho T. L. 2016 “Here’s an opportunity: Knowledge sharing among competitors as a response to uncertainty.” Working paper, MIT Sloan.
Bromiley P., 1992, Risk-taking Behavior: 87–132
Correll S., 2003, Handbook of Social Psychology: 29–51
Ding W. W., Murray F., Stuart T. E. 2006 “Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences.” Science, 313: 665–667.
Financial Times 2013 Global MBA Ranking. London: Financial Times. Accessed at http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013.
Foschi M., 1989, Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations: 58–72
Foschi M., 1988, Status Generalization: New Theory and Research: 248–260
Hinz R. P., 1997, Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-first Century: 91–103
Maguire F. P. 2012 Advanced Global Name Recognition Technology. New York: IBM.
National Council for Research on Women 2009 “Women in fund management: The report.” http://regender.org/reports-publications/women-fund-management-report.
Niessen A., Ruenzi S. 2007 “Sex matters: Gender differences in a professional setting.” CFR Working Paper No. 06–01. http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/57738.
Phelps E. S., 1972, American Economic Review, 62, 659
Podolny J. M. 2005 Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rothstein Kass Institute 2012 Women in Alternative Investments: Building Momentum in 2013 and Beyond. Roseland, NJ: Rothstein Kass Institute.
Salganik M. J., 2006, Science, New Series, 311, 854
Sunden A. E., 1998, American Economic Review, 88, 207
U.S. Census Bureau 1990 Genealogy Data. http://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/1990_census/1990_census_namefiles.html.
U.S. News and World Report 2013a Best Business Schools. Accessed at http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-business-schools.
U.S. News and World Report 2013b National University Rankings. Accessed at http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/data.
VanDerhei J. L., 1997, Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-first Century: 45–66
Wagner D. G., 1993, Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory: 23–63