Pupil dilation indicates the coding of past prediction errors: Evidence for attentional learning theory

Psychophysiology - Tập 55 Số 4 - 2018
Stephan Koenig1, Metin Uengoer1, Harald Lachnit1
1Department of Psychology Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe attentional learning theory of Pearce and Hall () predicts more attention to uncertain cues that have caused a high prediction error in the past. We examined how the cue‐elicited pupil dilation during associative learning was linked to such error‐driven attentional processes. In three experiments, participants were trained to acquire associations between different cues and their appetitive (Experiment 1), motor (Experiment 2), or aversive (Experiment 3) outcomes. All experiments were designed to examine differences in the processing of continuously reinforced cues (consistently followed by the outcome) versus partially reinforced, uncertain cues (randomly followed by the outcome). We measured the pupil dilation elicited by the cues in anticipation of the outcome and analyzed how this conditioned pupil response changed over the course of learning. In all experiments, changes in pupil size complied with the same basic pattern: During early learning, consistently reinforced cues elicited greater pupil dilation than uncertain, randomly reinforced cues, but this effect gradually reversed to yield a greater pupil dilation for uncertain cues toward the end of learning. The pattern of data accords with the changes in prediction error and error‐driven attention formalized by the Pearce‐Hall theory.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709

10.1080/17470218.2015.1009919

10.1111/psyp.12770

10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.040

10.1017/S0952523812000077

10.1080/14640748408401502

10.1038/nn.3428

10.3758/s13414-010-0015-4

10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2

10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00145

10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.227

10.1037/a0018528

10.1080/17470210701643439

10.3102/10769986001001069

10.1162/jocn.2010.21548

10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028

10.1037/h0026912

10.1037/0097-7403.10.1.90

Keppel G., 1991, Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook

10.3758/BF03201851

Koenig S.(2010).Modulation of saccadic curvature by spatial memory and associative learning(Doctoral dissertation). Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany. Retrieved fromhttp://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2010/0636/

10.1037/a0023718

10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00128

10.3389/fnhum.2017.00266

10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00281.x

10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00200

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.002

Lynn R., 1966, Attention, arousal and the orientation reaction

10.1167/13.2.11

10.1038/nn.3130

10.1073/pnas.1305373110

10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111

10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532

Pearce J. M., 1982, Quantitative analysis of behavior, 241

Pearce J. M., 2010, Attention and learning, 11

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024

10.3389/fnins.2011.00115

10.1167/10.10.3

R Core Team. (2017).R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria.http://www.R-project.org/

Rajkowski J., 1993, Correlations between locus coeruleus (LC) neural activity, pupil diameter and behavior in monkey support a role of LC in attention, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 19, 974

10.1016/S0301-0511(02)00011-X

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00374.x

10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151

Rescorla R. A., 1972, Classical conditioning II, 64

10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00291.x

10.1111/1467-9280.00287

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.066

10.1098/rstb.2008.0152

10.1080/17470210601000581

10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519

10.3758/BF03210755

Sokolov E. N., 1963, Perception and the conditioned reflex

10.1023/A:1015820025297

10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.292

10.1371/journal.pone.0051134

Wagner A. R., 1972, Inhibition and learning, 301

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5512-11.2012

10.1111/ejn.12883

10.1111/ejn.12641

10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.018