Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Tóm tắt
This study was to elucidate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (K-DSC-R), which is a patient-reported outcome measure of diabetes symptom burden. A sample of 432 Korean patients with diabetes was recruited from university hospitals. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multitrait/multi-item correlation, Pearson’s correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and Cronbach’s alpha for construct, item-convergent/discriminant, concurrent, and known-groups validity, and internal consistency reliability. EFA extracted a total of 29 items clustered into 7 subscales from the K-DSC-R. The construct of the seven-subscales was supported by CFA. The scaling success rates of item-convergent validity were 100% for all subscales, and those of item-discriminant validity ranged from 83.3% to 100%. Patients in more-depressed groups and in the HbA1c-uncontrolled group had higher K-DSC-R scores, satisfying the known-groups validity. The subscales of the K-DSC-R were moderately correlated with health-related quality of life, indicative of the established concurrent validity. The Cronbach’s alpha of the K-DSC-R was 0.92. The psychometric properties of the K-DSC-R have been established. It is thus appropriate for use with respect to reliability and validity in practice and clinical trials for Korean patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
International Diabetes Federation: Diabetes Atlas, 5th ed. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/
Korean Ministry and Health Welfare: Korea Health Statistics 2012: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-3). Seoul: Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.
American Diabetes Association: Diabetes Basics. http://www.diabetes.org
Posey AD: Symptom perception: a concept exploration. Nurs Forum 2006, 41: 113–124. 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00047.x
U.S Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf
Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K, Arondekar B, Danten-Viala M, Scott JA, Snoek FJ: Psychometric evaluation of the diabetes symptom checklist-revised (DSC-R)- a measure of symptom distress. Value Health 2009, 12: 1168–1175. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006, 4: 79.
Skelly AH, Leeman J, Carlson J, Soward ACM, Burns D: Conceptual model of symptom-focused diabetes care for African Americans. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008, 40: 261–267. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00236.x
Schreiber JB: Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Social Adm Pharm 2008, 4: 83–97. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.04.003
Grootenhuis PA, Snoek FJ, Heine RJ, Bouter LM: Development of a type 2 diabetes symptom checklist: a measure of symptom severity. Diabet Med 1994, 11: 253–261. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00268.x
Lee EH, Lee YW, Lee KW, Kim DJ, Kim SK: Development and psychometric evaluation of a diabetes-specific quality of life (D-QOL) scale. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012, 95: 76–84. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.08.022
Radolff LS: The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1: 385–401. 10.1177/014662167700100306
Cho MJ, Kim KH: Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in Korea. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998, 186: 304–310. 10.1097/00005053-199805000-00007
American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011. Diabetes Care 2011, 34(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ: Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2012.
Gable RK: Instrument Development in the Affective Domain. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff; 1986.
Byrne BM: Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005.
Hu LT, Bentler PM: Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999, 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
Ware JE Jr, Gabdek B: Methods for testing data quality, scale assumptions and reliability: The IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51: 945–952. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7
Adriaanse MC, Pouwer F, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Stehouwer CD, Heine RJ, Snoek FJ: Diabetes-related symptom distress in association with glucose metabolism and comorbidity: the Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care 2008, 31: 2268–2270. 10.2337/dc08-1074
Hu J, Amoako EP, Gruber KJ, Rossen EK: The relationships among health functioning indicators and depression in older adults with diabetes. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2007, 28: 133–150. 10.1080/01612840601096305
Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N: Validation of two generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5: 47. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-47
Nunnally J, Bernstein I: Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Naegeli AN, Stump TE, Hayes RP: A psychometric evaluation of the diabetes symptom checklist-revised (DSC-R) cognitive distress, fatigue, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia subscales in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2010, 3: 27–30.
Klein HA, Lin M-H, Radford M, Masuda T, Choi L, Lein Y, Yeh Y, Boff KR: Cultural differences in cognition. Psychol Rep 2009, 105: 659–674. 10.2466/PR0.105.2.659-674
Lee E-O, Lee S-H: Validation test of Korean pain measurement tool using normal adult individuals. J Korean Acad Nurs 1986, 16: 13–28.
Fayers PM, Machin D: Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Related Outcomes. 2nd edition. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Kim JH, Kim DJ, Jang HC, Choi SH: Epidemiology of micro- and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Metab J 2011, 25: 571–577.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60: 34–42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012