Psychological experience and coping strategies of patients in the Northeast US delaying care for infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic
Tóm tắt
On March 17, 2020 an expert ASRM task force recommended the temporary suspension of new, non-urgent fertility treatments during an ongoing world-wide pandemic of Covid-19. We surveyed at the time of resumption of fertility care the psychological experience and coping strategies of patients pausing their care due to Covid-19 and examined which factors were associated and predictive of resilience, anxiety, stress and hopefulness. Cross sectional cohort patient survey using an anonymous, self-reported, single time, web-based, HIPPA compliant platform (REDCap). Survey sampled two Northeast academic fertility practices (Yale Medicine Fertility Center in CT and Montefiore’s Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health in NY). Data from multiple choice and open response questions collected demographic, reproductive history, experience and attitudes about Covid-19, prior infertility treatment, sense of hopefulness and stress, coping strategies for mitigating stress and two validated psychological surveys to assess anxiety (six-item short-form State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAl-6)) and resilience (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, (CD-RISC-10). Seven hundred thirty-four patients were sent invitations to participate. Two hundred fourteen of 734 (29.2%) completed the survey. Patients reported their fertility journey had been delayed a mean of 10 weeks while 60% had been actively trying to conceive > 1.5 years. The top 5 ranked coping skills from a choice of 19 were establishing a daily routine, going outside regularly, exercising, maintaining social connection via phone, social media or Zoom and continuing to work. Having a history of anxiety (p < 0.0001) and having received oral medication as prior infertility treatment (p < 0.0001) were associated with lower resilience. Increased hopefulness about having a child at the time of completing the survey (p < 0.0001) and higher resilience scores (p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased anxiety. Higher reported stress scores (p < 0.0001) were associated with increased anxiety. Multiple multivariate regression showed being non-Hispanic black (p = 0.035) to be predictive of more resilience while variables predictive of less resilience were being a full-time homemaker (p = 0.03), having received oral medication as prior infertility treatment (p = 0.003) and having higher scores on the STAI-6 (< 0.0001). Prior to and in anticipation of further pauses in treatment the clinical staff should consider pretreatment screening for psychological distress and provide referral sources. In addition, utilization of a patient centered approach to care should be employed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Sexton MB, Byrd MR, von Kluge S. Measuring resilience in women experiencing infertility using the CD-RISC: examining infertility-related stress, general distress, and coping styles. J Psychiatr Res [Internet]. 2010;44(4):236–41. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.007.
Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;22(1):293–308.
Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins KMJ. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Heal Illn. 2009;32:140–62.
Galst JP. The elusive connection betweenstress and infertility: a research review with clinical implications. J Psychother Integr. 2018;28(1):1–13.
Esposito V, Rania E, Lico D, Pedri S, Fiorenza A, Strati MF, et al. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod biol [internet]. 2020;253:148–53. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.025.
Gordon JL, Balsom AA. The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(9 September):1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239253
Boivin J, Harrison C, Mathur R, Burns G, Pericleous-Smith A, Gameiro S. Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(11):2556–66.
Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82.
Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF, Juang KD. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2313–8.
Li Y, Zhang X, Shi M, Guo S, Wang L. Resilience acts as a moderator in the relationship between infertility-related stress and fertility quality of life among women with infertility: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):1–9.
Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger state—trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31(3):301–6.
Chlan L, Savik K, Weinert CVO-11. Development of a Shortened State Anxiety Scale From the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilatory Support. J Nurs Meas [Internet]. (3):283–2003. Available from: https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrjnm/11/3/283
Tluczek A, Henriques JB, Brown RL. Support for the reliability and validity of a six-item state anxiety scale derived from the state-trait anxiety inventory. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(1):19–28.
Goldman KN, Blakemore J, Kramer Y, McCulloh DH, Lawson A, Grifo JA. Beyond the biopsy: predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(7):1260–9.
Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor–davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress [Internet]. 2007;20(6):1019–28. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271.
Kong L, Fang M, Ma T, Li G, Yang F, Meng Q, et al. Positive affect mediates the relationships between resilience, social support and posttraumatic growth of women with infertility. Psychol Heal Med. 2018;23(6):707–16.
3.5.1. RDCT. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vol. 2, Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2018. p. https://www.R-project.org. Available from: http://www.r-project.org
Hofner B HT. stabs: Stability Selection with Error Control, R package version 0.6–3 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=stabs.
Hofner B, Boccuto L, Göker M. Controlling false discoveries in high-dimensional situations: boosting with stability selection. Bmc Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2015;16(1):144. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0575-3.
Lord S, Robertson N. The role of patient appraisal and coping in predicting distress in IVF. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2005;23(4):319–32.
Koert E, Harrison C, Bunting L, Gladwyn-Khan M, Boivin J. Causal explanations for lack of pregnancy applying the common sense model of illness representation to the fertility context. Psychol Health. 2018;33(10):1284–301.
Domar AD, Sakkas D, Toth TL. Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction: How to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
Turocy JM, Robles A, Hercz A, D’Alton M, Forman EJWZ. The emotional impact of the ASRM guidelines on fertility patients druing the COVID-19 pandemic. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2020;114(3):e63 Available from:http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf.
Ben-Kimhy R, Youngster M, Medina-Artom TR, Avraham S, Gat I, Haham LM, et al. Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions, and psychological reactions. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(1):1513.
Tracy M, Norris FH, Galea S. Differences in the determinants of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression after a mass traumatic event. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28(8):666–75.
Hou WK, Liu H, Liang L, Ho J, Kim H, Seong E, et al. Everyday life experiences and mental health among conflict-affected forced migrants: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020;264:50–68.
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet [Internet]. 2020 14 [cited 2020 Apr 26];395(10227):912–20. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620304608
Assari S. Black Americans may be more-resilient to stress than white Americans [internet]. The Conversation 2016. Available from: https://theconversation.com/black-americans-may-be-more-resilient-to-stress-than-white-americans-62338
Aldemir S, Eser A, Ozturk Turhan N, Dalbudak E, Topcu M. Relation of anxiety and depressive symptoms with perceived social support according to gender within infertile couples. J Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 2015;28(4):328.
Gibson DM, Myers JE. The effect of social coping resources and growth-fostering relationships on infertility stress in women. Citeseer; 2000. p. 68–80.
Yi-Frazier JP, Smith RE, Vitaliano PP, Yi JC, Mai S, Hillman M, et al. A person-focused analysis of resilience resources and coping in patients with diabetes. Stress Heal J Int Soc Investig Stress. 2010;26(1):51–60.
Alvord MK, Grados JJ. Enhancing resilience in children: a proactive approach. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2005;36(3):238.
Alvord MK, Rich BA, Berghorst LH. Resilience interventions. In: Norcross JC, GR VB, PN FDK, editors. APA handbook of clinical psychology: Psychopathology and health, Vol 4. American Psychological Association; 2016. p. 505–19.
Gameiro S, Boivin J, Domar A. Optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):302–9.
Poleshuck EL, Woods J. Psychologists partnering with obstetricians and gynecologists: meeting the need for patient-centered models of women’s health care delivery. Am Psychol. 2014;69(4):344.
Dancet EAF, Nelen WLDM, Sermeus W, De Leeuw L, Kremer JAM, D’Hooghe TM. The patients’ perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(5):467–87.