Protein structure refinement based on paramagnetic NMR shifts: Applications to wild‐type and mutant forms of cytochrome c

Protein Science - Tập 4 Số 2 - Trang 296-305 - 1995
Miriam Gochin1, Heinrich Röder2,1
1Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111
2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Tóm tắt

AbstractA new approach to NMR solution structure refinement is introduced that uses paramagnetic effects on nuclear chemical shifts as constraints in energy minimization or molecular dynamics calculations. Chemical shift differences between oxidized and reduced forms of horse cytochrome c for more than 300 protons were used as constraints to refine the structure of the wild‐type protein in solution and to define the structural changes induced by a Leu 94 to Val mutation. A single round of constrained minimization, using the crystal structure as the starting point, converged to a low‐energy structure with an RMS deviation between calculated and observed pseudo‐contact shifts of 0.045 ppm, 7.5‐fold lower than the starting structure. At the same time, the procedure provided stereospecific assignments for more than 45 pairs of methylene protons and methyl groups. Structural changes caused by the mutation were determined to a precision of better than 0.3 A. Structure determination based on dipolar paramagnetic (pseudocontact) shifts is applicable to molecules containing anisotropic paramagnetic centers with short electronic relaxation times, including numerous naturally occurring metalloproteins, as well as proteins or nucleic acids to which a paramagnetic metal ion or ligand may be attached. The long range of paramagnetic shift effects (up to 20 Å from the iron in the case of cytochrome c) provides global structural constraints, which, in conjunction with conventional NMR distance and dihedral angle constraints, will enhance the precision of NMR solution structure determination.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/232236a0

10.1016/0022-2364(85)90018-6

10.1016/0022-2836(92)90255-I

Bertini I, 1986, NMR of paramagnetic molecules in biological systems

Bleany B., 1972, Nuclear magnetic resonance shifts in solution due to lanthanide ions, J Magn Reson, 8, 91

10.1016/0022-2364(83)90226-3

Brünger AT, 1992, XPLOR version 3.0

10.1016/0022-2836(90)90200-6

10.1006/jmbi.1993.1259

10.1126/science.8502992

10.1021/bk-1991-0470.ch004

10.1021/bi00458a029

10.1126/science.1553543

10.1016/0022-2364(88)90146-1

10.1021/bi00427a027

10.1021/bi00466a011

10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82226-3

10.1021/bi00054a026

10.1021/bi00221a028

10.1016/0076-6879(93)27005-2

10.1021/bi00083a037

10.1126/science.8346440

Hickey DR, 1991, Enhanced thermodynamic stabilities of yeast iso‐1‐cytochromes c with amino acid replacements at positions 52 and 102, J Biol Chem, 266, 11686, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99011-3

10.1016/0005-2795(73)90172-4

Jardetzky O, 1981, NMR in molecular biology

10.1016/0006-291X(78)91513-9

10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-X

10.1016/0022-2364(70)90100-9

10.1007/978-1-4615-2886-9_1

10.1021/bi00288a004

10.1016/0006-291X(83)91093-8

10.1073/pnas.89.11.4796

10.1002/9780470122785.ch1

10.1007/BF00242473

10.1021/ja00025a002

10.1021/bi00187a004

10.1021/bi00501a003

10.1038/368425a0

Roder H, 1994, Mechanisms of protein folding, 26

10.1038/335700a0

10.1016/0022-2364(83)90117-8

10.1021/bi00330a031

10.1016/0022-2836(71)90121-5

10.1016/0022-2836(81)90528-3

10.1016/0022-2836(81)90529-5

10.1021/bi00094a007

10.1021/bi00215a015

10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17583.x

10.1016/0014-5793(90)81180-V

10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001123

10.1021/bi00427a026

10.1016/0022-2836(85)90013-0

10.1021/bi00089a050

Wüthrich K., 1976, NMR in biological research:Peptides and proteins

10.1051/epn/19861701011