Prospective elementary teachers’ aesthetic experience and relationships to mathematics
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.
Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379–397.
Boaler, J. (2015). What’s math got to do with it?. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematical worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 61–70.
Buerk, D. (1982). An experience with some able women who avoid mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 19–24.
Burton, L. (1999). Why is intuition so important to mathematicians but missing from mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 27–32.
Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 395–415.
DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematics problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131–147.
Dewey, J. (1963/1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
Dewey, J. (1980/1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). “Me and maths”: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Duckworth, E. (2006). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York, NY: Vintage.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 71–90.
Goldin, G. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., et al. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111–132.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 718–727.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, R., Kobiela, M., & Weinberg, P. J. (2013). Cultivating inquiry about space in a middle school mathematics classroom. ZDM, 45, 365–376.
Lockhart, P. (2009). A mathematician’s lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art form. New York, NY: Bellevue Literary Press.
Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Reflections and prospects. In D. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 237–244). New York, NY: Springer.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Pacey, A. (2001). Meaning in technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Papert, S. (1978). The mathematical unconscious. In J. Wechsler (Ed.), On aesthetics and science (pp. 105–120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Parker, J. (1998). Sums of consecutive integers. Mathematics in School, 27(2), 8–11.
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In K. L. Frank Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Schoenfeld, A. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145–166.
Shutkin, D. (1998). The deployment of information technology in the field of education and the augmentation of the child. In T. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 205–230). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Sinclair, N. (2001). The aesthetic is relevant. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 25–33.
Sinclair, N. (2002). The kissing triangles: The aesthetics of mathematical discovery. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 7, 45–63.
Sinclair, N. (2004). The roles of the aesthetic in mathematical inquiry. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 261–284.
Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetic approaches to teaching children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tymoczko, T. (Ed.). (1998). New directions in the philosophy of mathematics: An anthology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Valero, P. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematic education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Wager, A. A., & Stinson, D. W. (Eds.). (2012). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Walter, J. G., & Gerson, H. (2007). Teachers personal agency: Making sense of slope through additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 203–233.
Warfield, J., Wood, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2005). Autonomy, beliefs and the learning of elementary mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 439–456.
Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Willingham, D. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for your classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Witz, K. G. (2007). Spiritual aspirations connected with mathematics: The experience of American university students. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.