Proscription and its impact on anti‐consumption behaviour and attitudes: the case of plastic bags

Journal of Consumer Behaviour - Tập 9 Số 6 - Trang 470-484 - 2010
Anne Sharp1, Stine Bordier Høj1, Meagan Wheeler1
1Ehrenberg‐Bass Institute for Marketing Science, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, Australia.

Tóm tắt

Abstract This paper empirically examines whether proscription of a habitual consumption item can act as a mechanism to develop anti‐consumption behaviour and attitudes. The paper tracks a legislated retail ban on single‐use polyethylene plastic bags, analysing 1167 interviews with shoppers before the ban's announcement, during a 4‐month phasing‐out period (and demarketing campaign), and when the ban was in full effect. Two hundred and fifty three interviews are repeated with the same individuals to allow identification of individual‐level attitudinal and behavioural change. Anti‐consumption is typically conceptualised as a phenomenon based on choice. This research investigates how shoppers react when forced into anti‐consumption behaviour, and how supportive voluntary anti‐consumers are of others being made to change. Grouping shoppers according to their level of voluntary anti‐consumption of plastic bags before the ban, the analysis finds that shoppers who voluntarily showed anti‐consumption behaviour were the only group showing any voluntary shift in anti‐consumption behaviours during the phasing‐out period. These shoppers are supportive of forcing others to show anti‐consumption, while the level of behavioural and attitudinal resistance from shoppers that showed little or no voluntary anti‐consumption is low. These findings support the use of proscription to achieve anti‐consumption behaviours, however, proscription does not necessarily engender full anti‐consumption attitudes. This study adds to knowledge on anti‐consumption and shopper resistance to proscriptive interventions designed to reduce socially undesirable behaviours. It provides further evidence that demarketing campaigns, without accompanying negative reinforcers, may be insufficient to achieve widespread behavioural change alone. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

AbrahamM.2009. Get a handle on it city messenger; 6 20 May.

10.1108/07363760410558672

10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00531.x

10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.025

Clean Up The World.2007. Plastic bag bans around the world. Available at:http://www.cleanup.org.au/PDF/au/cua‐world‐update‐on‐plastic‐bags‐as‐at‐120207.pdf[Accessed on 27 September 2010].

10.1007/s10640-006-9059-2

10.1002/mar.10009

Ellis S, 2005, Plastic Grocery Bags: The Ecological Footprint

Environment Protection and Heritage Council.2002.Plastic Shopping Bags in Australia: National Plastic Bags Working Group Report to the National Packing Covenant Council. Adelaide: Environment Protection and Heritage Council.

Etzioni A, 1998, Voluntary simplicity: characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences, Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 619

Ewen S, 1988, All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01531.x

Gendall P, 2000, Responding to the problem of nonresponse, Australasian Journal of Market Research, 8, 3

HayabuchiY EnomotoY TYamasueE OkumuraH IshiharaK YearN. The role of environmental education and social system on the plastic bag problem. InProceedings of 3rd Conference on the Public Sector Ljubljana Slovenia 30 June–2 July 2005; 29–41.

10.1002/mar.20072

10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.023

JamesK GrantT. Year LCA of degradable plastic bags. InAustralian Life Cycle Assessment Conference: Sustainability Measures for Decision Support April 2006 Sydney.

10.2307/1250775

10.2307/1249783

Kozinets RV, 1998, Ensouling consumption: a netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 475

10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.024

McDonald C, 2002, Personal Buying is Like ‘Family’ Shopping. Report 12 for Corporate Members

10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.531

RazerH.2009. Bag Lady The Big Day Out August 13.

10.2501/S1470785309200426

Sharp B, 2001, Australia & New Zealand Academy of Marketing Conference 2001

10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.034

SmithS.2004. Plastic Bags. Sydney: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service.

10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.003

10.1023/A:1006211709570

10.1108/03090560510590647

10.1108/02634500710737915

Wan TS, 2007, Reducing Polyethylene Usage

Wan TS, 2008, Governing Polyethylene Reductions

Weekend Herald.2009. 5 September A29: New Zealand.

10.1016/0167-4870(89)90043-3

10.1002/mar.10007

Zero Waste SA.2008a. Frequently Asked Questions. Available at:http://byobags.com.au/About.mvc/FAQ/102[Accessed on 2nd December 2009].

Zero Waste SA.2008b. Plastic bag ban. Available at:http://www.zerowaste.sa.gov.au/About.mvc/PlasticBags[Accessed on 2nd December 2009].

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Tập 9 Số 6

470-484

Thông tin tác giả