Proposal of a Quality-Index or Metric for Soft Copy Display Systems: Contrast Sensitivity Study

Journal of Digital Imaging - Tập 16 - Trang 185-202 - 2003
Jihong Wang1, Ken Compton2, Qi Peng1
1Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390-9071, USA
2Clinton Electronics Inc., Loves Park, Illinois 61111, USA

Tóm tắt

In addition to the inherent qualities of a digital image, the qualities of the monitor and graphics control card as well as the viewing conditions will affect the perceived quality of an image that is displayed on a soft copy display (SD) system. With the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), many diagnoses are being made based on images displayed on SD devices, and consequently SD quality may affect the accuracy of diagnosis. Unlike the traditional film-on-lightbox display, optimal SD system parameters are not well defined, and many issues remain unsettled. In this article, the human observer performance, as measured by contrast sensitivity, for several SD devices including an active matrix liquid crystal flat panel monitor is reported. Contrast sensitivities were measured with various display system configurations. Experimental results showed that contrast sensitivity depends on many factors such as the type of monitor, the monitor brightness, and the gamma settings of the graphics card in a complex manner. However, there is a clear correlation between the measured contrast thresholds and the gradient of the display device’s luminance response curve. Based on this correlation, it is proposed to use the gradient of luminance response curve as a quality-index or metric for SD devices.

Tài liệu tham khảo

J Wang S Langer (1997) ArticleTitleA brief review of human perception factors in Digital Display for PACS. J Digit Imaging 10 158–168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmtFGgtQ%3D%3D

EA Krupinski H Roehrig (1999) ArticleTitleInfluence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers’ search and dwell patterns. Proc SPIE 3663 151–156 Occurrence Handle10.1117/12.349636

Carrino JA. “Image Quality: a clinical perspective” In: Siegel E, Reiner BI, and Carrino J, editors. SCAR University Primer 3: Quality Assurance in the Digital Medical Enterprise. Society for Computer Applications in Radiology; 2002.

Carrino JA. “Image Quality: a clinical perspective” In: Siegel E, Reiner BI, and Carrino J, editors. SCAR University Primer 3: Quality Assurance in the Digital Medical Enterprise. Society for Computer Applications in Radiology; 2002.

RL Arenson D Chakraborty SB Seshadri et al. (1990) ArticleTitleThe digital imaging workstation. Radiology 176 303–315 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BA3M7mtlA%3D Occurrence Handle2367643

Dwyer S: Soft copy displays and digitizers. In Frey G Sprawls P (eds) Proceedings of 1997 AAPM Summer School on Expanding Role of Medical Physics in Diagnostic Imaging AAPM 1997, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, 381

J Wang Q Peng (2002) ArticleTitleAn interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests. Proc SPIE 4686 189–197 Occurrence Handle10.1117/12.462677

E Muka BR Whiting (2002) ArticleTitleOn the human visual system intrascene luminance dynamic range. Proc SPIE 4686 169 Occurrence Handle10.1117/12.462676

E Muka G Reiker (2002) ArticleTitleReconsidering bit depth for radiological images—is eight enough? Proc SPIE 4686 177 Occurrence Handle10.1117/12.462675

A Badano MJ Flynn (1997) ArticleTitleImage degradation by glare in radiologic display devices. Proc SPIE: Int Soc Optical Eng 3031 222–231

Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, et al: Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. Draft Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18, Version 9.0, October 2002

Wang J: Computer monitor QC issues. Categorical Course at SCAR annual conference, 2001

M Weibrecht G Spekowius P Quadflieg et al. (1997) ArticleTitleImage quality assessment of monochrome monitors for medical soft copy display. Proc SPIE 3031 232–244

H Roehrig (1999) ArticleTitleImage quality assurance for CRT display systems. J Digit Imaging 12 1–2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lsFKrtA%3D%3D

H Roehrig (1999) ArticleTitleImage quality assurance for CRT display systems—Part II. J Digit Imaging 12 49 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntlOqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10342246

JC Weiser KT Drummond BD Evans et al. (1997) ArticleTitleQuality assurance for digital imaging. J Digit Imaging 10 7–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3MzpsVQ%3D Occurrence Handle9268821

J Wang (2002) ArticleTitleA Quality Index for the quality of softcopy display in PACS. Med Phys 29 1219