Promoting the AI teaching competency of K-12 computer science teachers: A TPACK-based professional development approach

Junmei Sun1, Hongliang Ma1, Y. Zeng1, Dawei Han1, Yunbo Jin1
1School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710062, Shaanxi, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Akpinar, Y., & Bal, V. (2006). Teachers’ collaborative task authoring to help students learn a science unit. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 84–95.

Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012

Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.

Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

Armoni, M. (2017). Computing in schools on teaching problem-solving paradigms in K-12 education. ACM Inroads, 8(4), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148533

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Baran, B. (2010). Facebook as a formal instructional environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E146–E149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01115.x

Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). Springer.

Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00001j

Brandes, O., & Armoni, M. (2019). The effects of a professional development workshop focusing on action research on the practice of high-school computer science teachers. Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361721.3361725

Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302

Caena, F. (2014). Teacher competence frameworks in Europe: Policy-as-discourse and policy-as-practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12088

Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers’ TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model (STLDM). Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1360506

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). A review of the quantitative measures of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 131–160). Routledge.

Chai, C. S., Rahmawati, Y., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Indonesian science, mathematics, and engineering preservice teachers’ experiences in STEM-TPACK design-based learning. Sustainability, 12(21), 9050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219050

Chen, Y., & Cao, L. (2022). Promoting maker‐centred instruction through virtual professional development activities for K‐12 teachers in low‐income rural areas. British Journal of Educational Technology, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13183

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Dorotea, N., Piedade, J., & Pedro, A. (2021). Mapping K-12 computer science teacher’s interest, self-confidence, and knowledge about the use of educational robotics to teach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080443

El-Hamamsy, L., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Bruno, B., Roy, D., Cahlikova, T., Chevalier, M., Parriaux, G., Pellet, J. P., Lanares, J., Zufferey, J. D., & Mondada, F. (2021). A computer science and robotics integration model for primary school: Evaluation of a large-scale in-service K-4 teacher-training program. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2445–2475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10355-5

Goel, A. K., & Joyne, D. A. (2017). Using AI to teach AI: Lessons from an online AI class. Ai Magazine, 38(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i2.2732

Goode, J., Peterson, K., Malyn-Smith, J., & Chapman, G. (2020). Online professional development for high school computer science teachers: Features that support an equity-based professional learning community. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(5), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2020.2989622

Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

Henry, J., Hernalesteen, A., & Collard, A. S. (2021). Teaching artificial intelligence to K-12 through a role-playing game questioning the intelligence concept. Kunstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00733-7

Hong, J. E., & Stonier, F. (2015). GIS in-service teacher training based on TPACK. Journal of Geography, 114(3), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.947381

Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Laßnig, J. P., Baumann, W., Plomer, S., Ballagi, A., & Alfoldi, I. (2019). Enabling the creation of intelligent things: Bringing artificial intelligence and robotics to schools. Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028537

Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, H. (2020). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 1–23,. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610

Kim, B. H., & Kim, J. (2016). Development and validation of evaluation indicators for teaching competency in steam education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1909–1924. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1537a

Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005

Kim, S., Jang, Y., Choi, S., Kim, W., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Analyzing teacher competency with TPACK for K-12 AI education. Kunstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00731-9

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872

Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004

Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2013). The COACTIV research program on teachers’ professional competence: Summary and discussion. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 345–368). Springer.

Lauermann, F., & König, J. (2016). Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: Understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy, and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.006

Lazarinis, F., Karachristos, C. V., Stavropoulos, E. C., & Verykios, V. S. (2019). A blended learning course for playfully teaching programming concepts to school teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9823-2

Margolis, J., Goode, J., & Bernier, D. (2011). The need for computer science. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 68–72.

Martinez, M. C., Gomez, M. J., Moresi, M., & Benotti, L. (2016). Lessons learned on computer science teachers professional development. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 77–82). https://doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899460

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). Information technology standard for high school. People’s Education Press.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moin, L. J., Dorfield, J. K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005). Where can we find future K-12 science and math teachers? a search by academic year, discipline, and academic performance level. Science Education, 89(6), 980–1006.

Monjelat, N., & Lantz-Andersson, A. (2019). Teachers’ narrative of learning to program in a professional development effort and the relation to the rhetoric of computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2175–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10048-8

Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2015). Dr. Scratch: Automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinking. RED. Revista De Educación a Distancia, 46, 1–23.

Murai, Y., & Muramatsu, H. (2020). Application of creative learning principles within blended teacher professional development on integration of computer programming education into elementary and middle school classrooms. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0122

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Oda, K., Herman, T., & Hasan, A. (2020). Properties and impacts of TPACK-based GIS professional development for in-service teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1657675

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments first results from TALIS. OECD, Paris. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf

Orakcı, Ş, Dilekli, Y., & Erdağ, C. (2020). The structural relationship between accountability felt and responsible teaching in Turkish teachers: The mediating effect of innovative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100662

Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–14). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Prajugjit, M., & Kaewkuekool, S. (2020). Development of trainer competency model: A case study at Thailand’s Department of Skill Development. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 28(2), 206–238. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2020.108971

Qian, Y. Z., Hambrusch, S., Yadav, A., & Gretter, S. (2018). Who needs what: Recommendations for designing effective online professional development for computer science teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1433565

Reimer, Y. J., & Blank, L. (2018). Teacher (as student) driven curriculum development for an introductory computer science course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 34(1), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.5555/3280489.3280525

Rich, P. J., Larsen, R. A., & Mason, S. L. (2021). Measuring teacher beliefs about coding and computational thinking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771232

Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Ruona, W. E. A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 223–263). Berrett-Koehler.

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599.

Sentance, S., Sinclair, J., Simmons, C., & Csizmadia, A. (2018). Classroom-based research projects for computing teachers: Facilitating professional learning. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171129

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11230

Tokmak, H. S., Incikabi, L., & Ozgelen, S. (2013). An investigation of change in mathematics, science, and literacy education pre-service teachers’ TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0040-2

Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). K-12 guidelines for artificial intelligence: what students should know. Paper presented at the 2019 ISTE Conference.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

van Doodewaard, C. (2020). They may be a level one student, but I love them all: Preservice teachers negotiating inclusion and diversity in their classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(4), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0042

Vazhayil, A., Shetty, R., Bhavani, R. R., & Akshay, N. (2019). Focusing on teacher education to introduce AI in schools: Perspectives and illustrative findings. Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 71–77). https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2019.00021

Wang, X. M., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). A problem posing-based practicing strategy for facilitating students’ computer programming skills in the team-based learning mode. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(6), 1655–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9551-0

Xue, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence for education and teaching. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4750018

Ye, L., & Wu, Y. P. (2003). Reform of classroom teaching and reform of classroom teaching evaluation. Educational Research, 08, 42–49.