Promoting productive argumentation through students' questions

Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94, 765–793.

Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: Fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classrooms. School Science Review, 86, 107–112.

Chin, C. (2006). Using self-questioning to promote pupils’ process skills thinking. School Science Review, 87, 113–122.

Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 521–549.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44, 1–39.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010a). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883–908.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010b). Supporting argumentation through students' questions: Case studies in science classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 230–284.

Chinn, P. W., & Hilgers, T. L. (2000). From corrector to collaborator: The range of instructor roles in writing-based natural and applied science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 3–25.

Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD]. (2013). Science syllabus – Lower secondary. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91–142.

Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspective from classroom-based research (pp. 159–175). Dordrecht: Springer.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argumentation pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–399.

Harper, K. A., Etkina, E., & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 776–791.

Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407–416.

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Lopez, R. R. (2001). Designing a field code:Environmental values in primary school. Environmental Education Research, 7, 5.

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2005). Argument construction and change while working on a real environment problem. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 419–431). Dordrecht: Springer.

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodrigues, A. G., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). ‘Doing the lesson’ or ‘doing science’: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environment. NewYork. NY: Routledge.

Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Prothero, W. (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline: Writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 691–718.

Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanograph students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314–342.

Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130.

Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1065–1084.

Kolsto, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risked-focuses socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1689–1716.

Lawson, A. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1387–1408.

Manson, L. (1996). An analysis of children’s construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411–433.

McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 793–823.

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 153–191.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London, England: Routledge.

Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994–1020.

Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Kiel: Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaten (IPN).

Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1999). Students’ perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83, 151–162.

Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566–593.

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92, 447–472.

Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23–55.

Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2007). What can argumentation tell us about epistemology? In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspective from classroom-based research (pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Springer.

Tan, A-L., Lee, P. P. F., & Cheah, Y. H. (2017). Educating science teachers in the twenty-first century: implications for pre-service teacher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 453-471.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962, 1986). , Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walton, D. (1996). Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.

Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28.

Zohar, A. (2007). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspective from classroom-based research (pp. 245–268). Dordrecht: Springer.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2001). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.