Promoting Student Teachers’ Self-Regulated Learning in the Workplace
Tóm tắt
This quasi-experimental study of self-regulated learning (SRL) in the context of primary teacher education emerged from the importance attributed to SRL for developing student teachers’ active and conscious learning. Contrary to earlier studies that focused on SRL within the initial teacher training, in this study we sought for the impact of increased SRL opportunities on student teachers’ motivation for learning in their workplace which is an important part of their educational program. The study focused on the way in which SRL opportunities for student teachers can be shaped in the workplace (research question one), the differences in perceived SRL opportunities between the experimental and the control condition (research question two) and the differences in motivation for learning between the experimental and the control condition (research question three). In answer to research question one, the earlier findings of SRL within the initial teacher program were combined with the insights and experiences of the stakeholders in practice. This resulted in a SRL approach for the workplace that was applied during one academic year by 12 primary teacher educators in cooperation with 45 primary teachers of 45 training schools. In answer to research question two, the training appeared effective because student teachers in training schools (N = 80) experienced more SRL opportunities than student teachers in the non-training schools (N = 51). In answer to research question three, student teachers in training schools demonstrated more motivational expectancy (i.e. control belief and self-efficacy for learning) compared with student teachers in non-training schools. This was in line with previous findings within initial teacher training. The importance of a gradual transition from teacher control to student control appeared vital.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: What do teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 837–855.
Bruinsma, M. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 549–568.
Degago, A. T., & Kaino, L. M. (2015). Towards student-centred conceptions of teaching: The case of four Ethiopian universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 493–505.
Dobber, M. (2011). Collaboration in groups during teacher education [Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University]. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/17720.
Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2015). Perception of democracy in computer-mediated Communication: Participation, responsibility, collaboration, and reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 92–106.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model specification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H. B., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 122–135.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. G. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 985–997.
Korthagen, F., Klaassen, C., & Russell, T. (2000). New learning in teacher education. In P.R.-J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 243–259). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kremer-Hayon, L., & Tillema, H. H. (1999). Self-regulated learning in the context of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 507–522.
Littlejohn, A., Jaldemark, J., Vrieling-Teunter, E., & Nijland, F. (2019). Networked professional learning: An introduction. In A. Littlejohn, J. Jaldemark, E. Vrieling-Teunter, & F. Nijland (Eds.), Networked professional learning: Emerging and equitable discourses for professional development (pp. 1–11). New York: Springer.
Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (2005). Breaking the didactic circle: A study on some aspects of the promotion of student-directed learning by teachers and teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 1–22.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.
Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 27–45.
Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198–215.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers Psychology, 28(4), 1–28.
Panadora, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). London/New Delhi: SAGE.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in Self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self- Regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
Power, J. B. (2016). Has this begun to change the way they think? Moving undergraduate learners’ level of reflection from where it is to where it needs to be. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 235–248.
Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1629–1646.
Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction: What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modelling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7–25.
Sundre, D. L., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). An exploration of the psychology of the examinee: Can examinee self-regulation and test-taking motivation predict consequential and non-consequential test performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 6–26.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384.
Vrieling-Teunter, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2010). Process-oriented design principles for promoting self-regulated learning in primary teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 141–150.
Vrieling-Teunter, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012a). Consequences of increased self-regulated learning opportunities on student teachers’ motivation and use of metacognitive skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 102–117.
Vrieling-Teunter, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012b). Effects of increased self-regulated learning opportunities on student teachers’ metacognitive and motivational development. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 251–263.
Vrieling-Teunter, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). The ‘Self-Regulated Learning Opportunities Questionnaire’: A diagnostic instrument for primary teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 799–821.
Vrieling-Teunter, E., Stijnen, S., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Successful learning: Balancing self-regulation with instructional planning. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6), 685–700.
Wigfield, A., & L., Hoa, W., & Klauda, S.L. (2007). The role of achievement values in the regulation of achievement behaviours. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 169–195). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205.