Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students' Writing

Agresti, A. (2002). <i>Categorical data analysis</i> (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. <i>Journal of Research in Science Teaching</i>, 33, 1099-1114.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. <i>Journal of Research in Science Teaching</i>, 39, 35-62.

Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Halliday, J., & Low, J. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. <i>Instructional Science</i>, 29, 1-32.

Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), <i>Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments</i> (pp. 1-25). Boston: Kluwer.

Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Latham, A. S., & Gentile, C. A. (1994). <i>NAEP 1992: Writing report card</i>. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Astleitner, H., Nussbaum, E. M., & Hofer, M. (2007, August). <i>Stimulating the generation of counterarguments during writing</i>. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.

Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. <i>Review of Educational Research</i>, 70, 181-214.

Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Espéret (Series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), <i>Foundations of argumentative text processing</i> (pp. 179-202). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E., Bluck, S., Vries, B. D., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), <i>Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis</i> (pp. 401-418). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). <i>The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin</i>. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Baron, J. (1988). <i>Thinking and deciding</i>. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Beardsley, M. (1950). <i>Practical logic</i>. New York: Prentice.

Bell, P. (2002). Using argument map representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), <i>CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation</i> (pp. 449-485). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bensley, D. A., & Haynes, C. (1995). The acquisition of general purpose strategic knowledge for argumentation. <i>Teaching of Psychology</i>, 22, 41-45.

Bernardi, B., & Antolini, E. (1996). Structural differences in the production of written arguments. <i>Argumentation</i>, 10, 175-196.

Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</i>, 127, 355-376.

Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), <i>Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing</i> (pp. 105-122). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chambliss, M. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Fourth and fifth graders representing the argument structure in written texts. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 34, 91-115.

Chinn, C. A. (2006). Learning to argue. In A. M. O'Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), <i>Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology</i> (pp. 355-383). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effect of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. <i>Educational Technology: Research and Development</i>, 50, 5-22.

Coirier, P., Andriessen, J., & Chanquoy, L. (1999). From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Espéret (Series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), <i>Foundations of argumentative text processing</i> (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 97, 139-156.

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 94, 687-698.

Dolz, J. (1996). Learning argumentative capacities: A study of the effects of a systematic and intensive teaching of argumentative discourse in 11-12 year old children. <i>Argumentation</i>, 10, 227-251.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in the classrooms. <i>Science Education</i>, 4, 287-312.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. <i>Science Education</i>, 88, 915-933.

Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normal achieving peers. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 92, 694-702.

Freeman, J. B. (1991). <i>Dialectics and the macrostructure of argument</i>. New York: Foris.

Fulkerson, R. (1996a). <i>Teaching the argument in writing</i>. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Fulkerson, R. (1996b). The Toulmin model of argument and the teaching of composition. In B. Emmel, P. Resch, & D. Tenney (Eds.), <i>Argument revisited, argument redefined: Negotiating meaning in the composition classroom</i> (pp. 45-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gleason, M. M. (1999). The role of evidence in argumentative writing. <i>Reading & Writing Quarterly</i>, 14, 81-106.

Golanics, J. D., & Nussbaum, E. M. (in press). Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions. <i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i>.

Goldsmith, D. J., & Fulfs, P. A. (1999). You just don't have the evidence: An analysis of claims and evidence in Deborah Tannen's "You just don't understand." In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), <i>Communication Yearbook</i> (Vol. 22, pp. 1-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Halford, G. S., & McCredden, J. E. (1998). Cognitive science questions for cognitive development: The concepts of learning, analogy, and capacity. <i>Learning and Instruction</i>, 8, 289-308.

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. <i>Cognition and Instruction</i>, 16, 431-473.

Hidi, S. E., & Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 6, 91-105.

Hoch, S. J. (1984). Availability and inference in predictive judgment. <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</i>, 10, 649-662.

Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). <i>Experiments on mass communication</i>. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hunsberger, B., Lea, J., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M., & McKenzie, B. (1992). Making life complicated: Prompting the use of integrative complex thinking. <i>Journal of Personality</i>, 60, 95-114.

Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. (2002). <i>Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument</i> (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Johnson, R. H. (2002). <i>Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument</i>. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. <i>Cognition and Instruction</i>, 18, 53-81.

Kelly, G. J., Drucker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. <i>International Journal of Science Education</i>, 20, 849-871.

Knudson, R. E. (1992). The development of written argumentation: An analysis and comparison of argumentative writing at four grade levels. <i>Child Study Journal</i>, 22, 167-184.

Knudson, R. E. (1994). An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 18, 211-230.

Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry: Argumentation is learning. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), <i>Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments</i> (pp. 261-269). Boston: Kluwer.

Kroll, B. M. (2000). Broadening the repertoire: Alternative to the argumentative edge. <i>Composition Studies</i>, 28, 11-27.

Kuhn, D. (1991). <i>The skills of argument</i>. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? <i>Psychological Science</i>, 12, 1-8.

Kuhn, D. (2005). <i>Education for thinking</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argumentation skills. <i>Child Development</i>, 74, 1245-1260.

Kyratzis, A. (2001). Children's gender indexing in language: From the separate worlds hypothesis to considerations of culture, context, and power. <i>Research on Language and Social Interaction</i>, 34, 1-13.

Lampert, M. L., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), <i>Handbook of human development in education</i> (pp. 731-764). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Le, C. T. (1998). <i>Applied categorical data analysis</i>. New York: Wiley.

Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. <i>Human Development</i>, 43, 332-360.

Leitão, S. (2003). Evaluating and selecting counterarguments. <i>Written Communication</i>, 20, 269-306.

Leman, P. J., Ahmed, S., & Ozarow, L. (2005). Gender, gender relations, and the social dynamics of children's conversations. <i>Developmental Psychology</i>, 41, 64-74.

Liht, J., Suedfeld, P., & Krawczyk, A. (2005). Integrative complexity in face-to-face negotiations between the Chiapas guerillas and the Mexican government. <i>Political Psychology</i>, 26, 543-552.

Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. <i>Soviet Psychology</i>, 26(3), 25-45.

Mallin, I., & Anderson, K. V. (2000). Inviting constructive argument. <i>Argumentation and Advocacy</i>, 36, 120-133.

Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. <i>Instructional Science</i>, 29, 127-153.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). <i>Learning and instruction</i>. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. <i>Cognition and Instruction</i>, 14, 139-178.

Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. <i>Learning and Instruction</i>, 6, 359-377.

Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. <i>The Journal of Educational Research</i>, 78, 11-17.

Nickerson, R. S. (2004). <i>Cognition and chance: The psychology of probabilistic reasoning</i>. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Nussbaum, E. M. (2005). The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation. <i>Contemporary Educational Psychology</i>, 30, 286-313.

Nussbaum, E. M., Elsadat, S., & Khago, A. H. (in press). Best practices in analyzing count data: Poisson regression. In J. Osborne (Ed.), <i>Best practices in quantitative methods</i>. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 97, 157-169.

Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (in press). The role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. <i>International Journal of Science Education.</i>

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. <i>Research in the Teaching of English</i>, 25, 261-290.

O'Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), <i>Communication yearbook</i> (Vol. 22, pp. 209-249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Page-Voth, V., & Graham, S. (1999). Effects of goal setting and strategy use on the writing performance and self-efficacy of students with writing and learning problems. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 91, 230-240.

Paul, R. W. (1986). Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), <i>Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice</i> (pp. 127-148). New York: Freeman.

Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), <i>Informal reasoning and education</i> (pp. 83-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Perloff, R. M. (2003). <i>The dynamics of persuasion</i> (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Piolat, A., Roussey, J.Y., & Gombert, A. (1999). The development of argumentative schema in writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Espéret (Series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), <i>Foundations of argumentative text processing</i> (pp. 117-135). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. <i>Cognitive Science</i>, 11, 481-518.

Rabash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., et al. (2000). <i>A user's guide to MLwiN</i>. London: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education, University of London.

Rancer, A. S., Whitecap, V. G., Kosberg, R. L., & Avtgis, T. A. (1997). Testing the efficacy of a communication training program to increase argumentativeness and argumentative behavior in adolescents. <i>Communication Education</i>, 46, 273-286.

Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Ngyuen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 32, 155-175.

Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 87, 455-467.

Santos, C. M. M., & Santos, S. L. (1999). Good argument, content and contextual dimensions. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Espéret (Series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), <i>Foundations of argumentative text processing</i> (pp. 75-95). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), <i>Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments</i> (pp. 227-260). Boston: Kluwer.

Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right: If they argue together! <i>Cognition and Instruction</i>, 18, 461-494.

Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. <i>Personality and Social Psychology</i>, 6, 283-294.

Sprod, T, (1998). "I can change your opinion on that": Social constructivist whole class discussions and their effects on scientific reasoning. <i>Research in Science Education</i>, 28, 463-480.

Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese university students. <i>Written Communication</i>, 18, 506-548.

Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. (2001). The origin and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 32, 113-133.

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), <i>Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis</i> (pp. 393-400). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. <i>Science Education</i>, 86(2), 264-286.

Toulmin, S. (1958). <i>The uses of argument</i>. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Voss, J. F. (2001). Argumentation in psychology: Background comments. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, 32, 89-111.

Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., Williams, S., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. <i>Cognition and Instruction</i>, 15, 435-484.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). <i>Thought and language</i>. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Waggoner, M., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative reasoning about stories. <i>Language Arts</i>, 72, 582-589.

Weinstock, M., & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror reasoning skill. <i>Applied Cognitive Psychology</i>, 17, 161-181.

Wiley, J. (2005). A fair and balanced look at the news: What affects memory for controversial arguments? <i>Journal of Memory and Language</i>, 53, 95-109.

Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 91, 301-311.

Yeh, S. S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle school students. <i>Research in the Teaching of English</i>, 33, 49-83.