Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akerson VL, Morrison JA, McDuffie AR (2006) One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 43:194–213
American Association for the Advancement of Science, AAAS (1989) Project 2061: Science for all Americans. AAAS, Washington, DC
American Association for the Advancement of Science, AAAS (1993) Bench marks for science literacy: Project 2061. Oxford University Press, New York
Abd-El-Khalick F, Akerson VL (2004) Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Sci Educ 88:785–810
Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG (2000) Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ 22:665–701
Adúriz-Bravo A, Izquierdo M, Estany A (2002) Una propuesta para estructurar la enseñanza de la filosofía de la ciencia para el profesorado de ciencias en formación. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 20:465–476
Ander P, Sonnessa AJ (1981) Principles of chemistry (Spanish ed.). Macmillan, New York
Bell R, Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG, McComas WF, Matthews MR (2001) The nature of science and science education: a bibliography. Sci & Educ 10:187–204
Bianchini JA, Colburn A (2000) Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: a tale of two researchers. J Res Sci Teach 37:177–209
Blanco R, Niaz M (1997) Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers about the nature of science: from “Baconian inductive ascent” to the “irrelevance” of scientific laws. Instruct Sci 25:203–231
Brady JE, Holum JR (1981) Fundamentals of chemistry (Spanish ed.). Wiley, New York
Brady JE, Humiston JE (1996) General chemistry: principles and structure (Spanish ed.). Wiley, New York
Brito A, Rodríguez MA, Niaz M (2005) A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. J Res Sci Teach 42:84–111
Brown TL, LeMay HE (1988) Chemistry: the central science, 4th edn. (Spanish). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Brush SG (1978) Why chemistry needs history—and how it can get some. J College Sci Teach 7:288–291
Burbules NC, Linn MC (1991) Science education and philosophy of science: congruence or contradiction? Int J Sci Educ 13:227–241
Burns RA (1996) Fundamentals of chemistry, 2nd edn. (Spanish). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Campanario JM (2002) The Parallelism between scientists’ and students’ resistance to new scientific ideas. Int J Sci Educ 24:1095–1110
Campanario JM, Otero JC (2000) Más Allá de las Ideas Previas como Dificultades de Aprendizaje: las Pautas de Pensamiento, las Concepciones Epistemológicas y las Estrategias Metacognitivas de los Alumnos de Ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 18:155–169
Chang R (1999) Chemistry, 6th edn. (Spanish). McGraw-Hill, New York
Clough MP (2006) Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Sci & Educ 15:463–494
De Berg KC (2003) The development of the theory of electrolytic dissociation: a case study of a scientific controversy and the changing nature of chemistry. Sci & Educ 12:397–419
De Posada JM (1999) Concepciones de los Alumnos Sobre el Enlace Químico Antes, Durante y Después de la Enseñanza Formal: Problemas de Aprendizaje. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 17:227–245
Ebbing DD (1997) General chemistry, 5th edn. (Spanish). McGraw-Hill, New York
Eflin JT, Glennan S, Reisch G (1999) The nature of science: a perspective from the philosophy of science. J Res Sci Teach 36:107–116
Falconer I (1987) Corpuscles, electrons, and cathode rays: J.J. Thomson and the “discovery of the electron”. Brit J Hist Sci 20:241–276
Furió C, Azcona R, Guisáosla J (2002) Revisión de Investigaciones sobre la Enseñanza-Aprendizaje de los Conceptos Cantidad de Sustancia y Mol. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 20:229–242
Gage N (1989) The paradigm wars and their aftermath. Educ Res 18:4–10
García JJ (2000) La Solución de Situaciones Problemáticas: Una Estrategia Didáctica para la Enseñanza de la Química. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 18:113–129
Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Hein M (1990) Foundations of college chemistry (Spanish ed.). Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
Holton G (1978) Subelectrons, presuppositions and the Millikan–Ehrenhaft dispute. Hist Stud Phys Sci 9:161–224
Holton G (1993) Science and anti-science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Howe KR (1988) Against the quantitative–qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educ Res 17:10–16
Irwin AR (2000) Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Sci Educ 84:5–26
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33:14–26
Justi R, Gilbert J (1999) A cause of historical science teaching: use of hybrid models. Sci Educ 83:163–177
Kaufmann W (1897) Die Magnetische Ablenkbarkeit der Kathodenstrahlen und Ihre Abhangigkeit vom Entladungspotential. Annalen de Physik und Chemie 61:544
Khishfe R, Lederman NG (2006) Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: integrated versus nonintegrated. J Res Sci Teach 43:395–418
Kousathana M, Tsaparlis G (2002) Students’ errors in solving numerical chemical equilibrium problems. Chem Educ: Res Pract Eur 3:5–17
Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 91–195
Laudan R, Laudan L, Donovan A (1988) Testing theories of scientific change. In: Donovan A, Laudan. L, Laudan R (eds), Scrutinizing science: empirical studies of scientific change. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 3–44
Lederman NG (1992) Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 29:331–359
Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS (2002) Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39:497–521
Leite L (2002) History of science in science education: development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Sci & Educ 11:333–359
Lin H, Chen C (2002) Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. J Res Sci Teach 39:773–792
Lincoln YS, Guba EG (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds), Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 191–215
Mahan BM, Myers RJ (1990) University chemistry, 4th edn. (Spanish). Addison-Wesley, Wilmington, DE
Marín N (1999) Delimitando el Campo de Aplicación del Cambio Conceptual. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 17:80–92
Masterton WL, Slowinski EJ, Stanitski CL (1985) Chemical principles, 5th edn. (Spanish). Saunders, Philadelphia
Matthews MR (1994a) Science teaching: the role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge, New York
Matthews MR (1994b) Historia, Filosofía y Enseñanza de las Ciencias: La Aproximación Actual. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 12:255–277
Matthews MR (2004) Thomas Kuhn’s impact on science education: what lessons can be learned? Sci Educ 88(1):90–118
McComas WF (1996) Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Sci Math 96:10–16
McComas WF, Almazroa H, Clough MP (1998) The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Sci & Educ 7:511–532
Mellado V, Ruiz C, Bermejo ML, Jiménez R (2006) Contributions from the philosophy of science to the education of science teachers. Sci & Educ 15:419–445
Monk M, Osborne J (1997) Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: a model for the development of pedagogy. Sci Educ 81:405–424
National Research Council, NRC (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Niaz M (1994) Enhancing thinking skills: domain specific/domain general strategies—a dilemma for science education. Instruct Sci 22:413–422
Niaz M (1995) Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: a Lakatosian interpretation. Sci Educ 79:19–36
Niaz M (1998) From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: a rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Sci Educ 82:527–552
Niaz M (1999) The role of idealization in science and its implications for science education. J Sci Educ Technol 8:145–150
Niaz M (2000a) The oil drop experiment: a rational reconstruction of the Millikan–Ehrenhaft controversy and its implications for chemistry textbooks. J Res Sci Teach 37:480–508
Niaz M (2000b) A framework to understand students’ differentiation between heat energy and temperature and its educational implications. Interchange 31:1–20
Niaz M (2000c) A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Instruct Sci 28:23–50
Niaz M (2001a) Understanding nature of science as progressive transitions in heuristic principles. Sci Educ 85:684–690
Niaz M (2001b) A rational reconstruction of the origin of the covalent bond and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Int J Sci Educ 23:623–641
Niaz M (2001c) How important are the laws of definite and multiple proportions in chemistry and teaching chemistry?—a history and philosophy of science perspective. Sci & Educ 10:243–266
Niaz M (2002) Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of electrochemistry. Int J Sci Educ 24:425–439
Niaz M (2004) Exploring alternative approaches to methodology in educational research. Interchange 35:155–184
Niaz M, Aguilera D, Maza A, Liendo G (2002) Arguments, contradictions, resistances and conceptual change in students’ understanding of atomic structure. Sci Educ 86:505–525
Osborne J, Collins S, Ratcliffe M, Millar R, Duschl R (2003) What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. J Res Sci Teach 40:692–720
Perl ML (2005) Personal Communication (email) to the Author, December 1
Perl ML, Lee ER (1997) The search for elementary particles with fractional electric charge and the philosophy of speculative experiments. Am J Phys 65:698–706
Phillips DC (1990) Subjectivity and objectivity: an objective inquiry. In: Eisner EW, Peshkin A (eds), Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate. Teachers College Press, New York
Pickering M (1990) Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving. J Chem Educ 67:254–255
Rodríguez MA, Niaz M (2004) The oil drop experiment: an illustration of scientific research methodology and its implications for physics textbooks. Instruct Sci 32:357–386
Sanger MJ, Greenbowe TJ (1997) Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. J Res Sci Teach 34:377–398
Scharmann LC, Smith MU (2001) Further thoughts on defining versus describing the nature of science: a response to Niaz. Sci Educ 85:691–693
Schwab JJ (1962) The teaching of science as enquiry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Schwab JJ (1974) The concept of the structure of a discipline. In: Eisner EW, Vallance E (eds), Conflicting conceptions of Curriculum. McCutchan, Berkeley, CA, pp 162–175 (First published 1962)
Shulman LS (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: a contemporary perspective. In: Wittrock MC (ed), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 3–36
Sienko MJ, Plane RA (1971) Chemistry, 4th edn. (Spanish). McGraw-Hill, New York
Smith MU, Lederman NG, Bell RL, McComas WF, Clough MP (1997) How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: a response to alters. J Res Sci Teach 34:1101–1103
Smith MU, Scharmann LC (1999) Defining versus describing the nature of science: a pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Sci Educ 83:493–509
Solbes J, Traver MJ (1996) La Utilización de la Historia de las Ciencias en la Enseñanza de la Física y Química. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 14:103–112
Solbes J, Traver MJ (2001) Resultados Obtenidos Introduciendo Historia de la Ciencia en las Clases de Física y Química: Mejora de la Imagen de la Ciencia y Desarrollo de Actitudes Positivas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 19:151–162
Solomon J, Scott L, Duveen J (1996) Large scale exploration of pupils’ understanding of the nature of science. Sci Educ 80:493–508
Stinner A, Teichman J (2003) Lord Kelvin and the age-of-the-earth debate: a dramatization. Sci & Educ 12:213–228
Whitten KW, Davis RE, Peck ML (1998) General chemistry, 3rd edn. (Spanish). McGraw-Hill, New York
Wiechert E (1897) Ergebniss einer Messung der Geschwindigkeit der Kathodenstrahlen. Schriften der Physikalischokonomisch Gesellschaft zu Konigsberg 38:3