Progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease: Improved Diagnostic Value of the Combined Use of N200 Latency and β-Amyloid(1–42) Levels

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders - Tập 28 Số 1 - Trang 30-35 - 2009
Vasileios Papaliagkas1, G. Anogianakis1, Magda Tsolaki2, George Koliakos3, Vasilios Κ. Kimiskidis2
1Department of Experimental Physiology, Faculty of Medicine,
2Third Department of Neurology, G. Papanikolaou Hospital,
3Laboratory of Biological Chemistry,Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Tóm tắt

<i>Background/Aims:</i> The aim of this study was to investigate the role of cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid(1–42) levels and auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) in the progress of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). <i>Methods:</i> In 53 MCI patients, lumbar puncture was performed and β-amyloid(1–42) levels were determined. Twenty patients were reexamined after 11 months. During this period, 5 of them progressed to AD. Neuropsychological and ERP analyses were performed on all patients during both baseline and endpoint examinations. <i>Results:</i> Compared to stable MCI patients, those that progressed to AD had significantly lower β-amyloid(1–42) levels (Mann-Whitney test, Z = –2.952, p = 0.003; effect size r = –0.41) and significantly prolonged N200 latencies (Mann-Whitney test, Z = –3.561, p < 0.001, effect size r = –0.49). From ERP variables, only the N200 latency significantly correlated with β-amyloid(1–42) levels (baseline examination: r<sub>s</sub> = –0.421, p = 0.002; follow-up examination: r<sub>s</sub> = –0.574, p = 0.008). <i>Conclusions:</i> The combined use of these two parameters enabled discrimination of stable MCI patients from those who developed AD, with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, this method could be of high diagnostic value for the early diagnosis of AD.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2004.10.011

10.1212%2FWNL.34.7.939

10.1038%2F325733a0

10.1073%2Fpnas.82.12.4245

10.1001%2Farchneur.56.6.673

10.1001%2Farchneur.55.7.937

10.1016%2FS1474-4422%2806%2970355-6

10.1097%2FWNP.0b013e31815068d5

10.1186%2F1471-2202-9-107

10.1097%2F00003446-199502000-00004

10.1016%2FS0013-4694%2897%2900160-0

10.1136%2Fjnnp.74.7.878

10.1016%2F0022-3956%2875%2990026-6

10.1001%2Farchneur.56.3.303

10.1080%2F13554790490896785

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2896%2908256-6

10.1038%2Fnrd1155

10.1016%2Fj.neuroscience.2007.09.009

10.2174%2F156720509788486626

10.1152%2Fjn.00202.2002