Progress Towards Optimal Trial End-Points in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Tóm tắt
Trials in rheumatoid arthritis have been difficult to perform and interpret due to disagreement over what to measure. This paper reviews the most frequently used measures and their validity against the background of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) consensus conferences. These conferences have resulted in the adoption of a core set of end-points to be used as a minimum in all clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. These are known as the World Health Organization/International League of Associations for Rheumatology (WHOIILAR) core set. p ]This set of measures comprises: (i) pain; (ii) patient global assessment; (iii) physical disability; (iv) swollen joints; (v) tender joints; (vi) acute phase reactants; (vii) physician (assessor) global assessment; and, in studies of 1 or more years duration, (viii) radiographs of joints. Other developments include a renewed interest in aggregate end-points (indices) such as response criteria, and in the measurement of adverse effects and economic costs. In sum, measurement methodology in rheumatoid arthritis has been improved in time to take advantage of expected important advances in treatment.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Pincus T, Callahan LF. Reassessment of twelve traditional paradigms concerning the diagnosis, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality of rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1989; 79Suppl.: 67–95
Kirwan JR. A theoretical framework for process, outcome and prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 333–6
Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the Health Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 789–93
Meenan RF, Gutman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in rheumatoid arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 146–52
Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, et al. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 25: 1–10
Ware JE, Donald-Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 6: 473–83
Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15A: 221–9
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993: 118: 622–9
Tugwell P, Boers M, for the OMERACT committee. OMERACT conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: conclusion. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 590
Wolfe F, Cathey MA. The assessment and prediction of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 1298–306
Anderson JJ, Felson DT, Meenan RF, et al. Which traditional measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 1093–9
Gøtzsche PC. Sensitivity of effects variables in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of 130 placebo-controlled NSAID trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 1313–8
Van de Heide A, Jacobs WGJ, Dinant HJ, et al. The impact of endpoint measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1992; 21: 287–94
Tugwell P, Boers M, for the OMERACT committee. Developing consensus on preliminary core efficacy endpoints for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 555–6
Wall PD. Introduction. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989
Van der Heijde DMFM, van Riel PLCM, van Rijswijk MH, et al. Influence of prognostic features on the final outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1988; 17: 284–92
Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. London: Kluwer, 1993: 65–76
Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 729–40
Pinals RS, Masi AT, Larsen RA. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1981; 24: 1308–15
Bombardier C, Raboud J and the Auranofin Cooperating Group. A comparison of health related quality of life measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical research. Controlled Clin Trials 1991; 12: S243–56
Hazes JMW, Hayton R, Silman AJ. A reevaluation of the symptom of morning stiffness. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1138–42
Meenan RF, Pincus T. The status of patient status measures. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 411–4
Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. London: Kluwer, 1993: 117–9
Spiegel TM, Spiegel JS, Paulus HE. The joint alignment and motion scale: a simple measure of joint deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 887–92
Parker JW, Harrell PB, Alarcon GS. The value of the joint alignment and motion scale in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1212–5
Bosi Ferraz M, Atra E, De Oliviera LM. What is the purpose of the joint alignment and motion scale [letter]? J Rheumatol 1989; 16: 853–4
Bosi Ferraz M, de Oliviera LM, Araujo PMP, et al. EPM-ROM Scale: an evaluative instrument to be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1990; 8: 491–4
Vliet Vlieland TPM, Van den Ende CHM, Breedveld FC, et al. Evaluation of joint mobility in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: the EPM-range of motion scale. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 2010–4
Hawley DJ, Wolfe F. Sensitivity to change of the health assessment questionnaire (H AQ) and other clinical and health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis: results of short term clinical trials and observational studies versus long term observational studies. Arthritis Health Care Res 1992; 5: 130–6
Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. The MACTAR patient preference disability questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 446–51
Guillemin F, Briançon S, Pourel J. Functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis: two different models in early and established disease. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 366–9
Cooperating clinics of the American Rheumatism Association. A seven day variability study of 499 patients with peripheral rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1965; 8: 302–34
Ritchie DM, Boyle JA, Mclnnes JM, et al. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med 1968; 147: 393–406
Fuchs HA, Pincus T. Reduced joint counts in controlled clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 470–5
Lansbury J. Report of a three-year study on the systemic and articular indexes in rheumatoid arthritis: theoretic and clinical considerations. Arthritis Rheum 1958; 1: 505–22
Thompson PW, Kirwan JR, Currey HLF. A comparison of the ability of 28 articular indices to detect an induced flare of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1988; 27: 375–80
Klinkhoff AV, Bellamy N, Bombardier C et al. An experiment in reducing inter-observer variability in the examination for joint tenderness. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 492–4
Prevoo MLL, van Riel PLCM, van’t Hof MA, et al. Validity and reliability of joint indices: a longitudinal study in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 589–94
Van Riel PLCM. Provisional guidelines for measuring disease activity in clinical trials on rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 793–4
American College of Rheumatology Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Reduced joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 463–4
Scott DL, Panayi GS, Van Riel PLCM, et al. Disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary report. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1992; 10: 521–35
Van Leeuwen MA, van Rijswijk MH, van der Heijde DMFM, et al. The acute phase response in relation to radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study during the first three years of disease. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32Suppl. 3: 9–13
Boers M, Tugwell P. The validity of pooled outcome measures (indices) in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 568–74
Fries JF, Bloch DA, Sharp JT, et al. Assessment of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 1–9
Edmonds JP, Scott DL, Furst DE, et al. Antirheumatic drugs: a proposed new classification. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 336–9
Iannuzzi L, Dawson N, Zein N, et al. Does drug therapy slow radiographic deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis? N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1023–8
Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn 1977; 18: 481–91
Sharp JT. Radiologic assessment as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 221–9
Van der Heijde DMFM, van Leeuwen MA, van Riel PLCM, et al. Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective follow up study of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 26–34
Wassenberg S, Herborn G, Kreutzburg S, et al. Larsen’s method is as precise as Sharp’s method in detecting change in long term observation of radiographs in RA. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38Suppl.: S329
Van der Heijde DMFM, Van Leeuwen MA, Van Riel PLCM et al. Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective follow-up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 26–34
Boers M. The validity of radiography as outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1783–6
Tugwell P, Boers M. OMERACT conference on outcome measures in clinical trials: introduction. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 528–9
Boers M, Tugwell P, for the OMERACT committee. Conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials, Maastricht, The Netherlands, April 29-May 3, 1992. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 525–91
Boers M, Tugwell P, Felson DT, et al. World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1994; 21Suppl. 41: 86–9
Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks PM, OMERACT committee. OMERACT II: conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 980–1433
Edmonds J, editor. Proceedings of the 5th Joint World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology Task Force meeting on Rheumatic Diseases. J Rheumatol 1994; 21Suppl. 41: 1–86
Felson DT, Anderson J, Boers M, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 727–35
Van Gestel AM, Van’t Hof MA, Van Rijswijk MH, et al. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organisation/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 34–40
Van der Heijde DMFM, Van’t Hof MA, Van Riel PLCM, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 916–20