Programming in Restrictive Housing: Considerations for Improving Outcome Evaluations

Criminal Justice and Behavior - Tập 45 Số 8 - Trang 1174-1191 - 2018
H. Daniel Butler1, Starr J. Solomon2, Ryan E. Spohn3
1Sam Houston State University
2Kent State University
3University of Nebraska, Omaha

Tóm tắt

A number of studies have identified “what works” in regard to the successful implementation of correctional programming over the past several decades. Few studies, however, have examined the complexities associated with programming in restrictive housing. Using data from a Midwestern department of corrections, we examined whether the provision of programming in restrictive housing achieved desired outcomes (e.g., reductions in inmate misconduct). The findings revealed the amount of time served in restrictive housing and confinement in different types of restrictive housing may influence estimations of a treatment effect. As a growing number of states seek to reform the use of restrictive housing, the proper implementation of cognitive-behavioral programming may increase institutional security and safety.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Civil Liberties Union, 2014, Submission on “the dangerous overuse of solitary confinement in the United States”

Amnesty International, 2014, Submission on ‘reassessing solitary confinement—The human rights, fiscal, and public safety consequences’

Andrews D. A., 2010, The psychology of criminal conduct, 5

10.1177/0011128705281756

10.3138/cjccj.49.4.439

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x

10.1080/10683160903524325

10.1177/0093854816639082

10.1080/15564880903227214

Beck A. J., 2015, Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011-12

10.1525/fsr.2011.24.1.46

10.1177/0887403412465715

10.1177/0093854814535082

10.1080/07418825.2016.1162319

10.1177/0032885517703925

10.1080/07418820300095601

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.001

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.1177/0032885501081003002

DiIulio J., 1987, Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management

10.1002/1097-4679(200007)56:7<907::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-I

10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.449

10.1111/1745-9133.12123

Foster H., 2016, Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions, 85

10.1177/0093854805284406

Frost N. A., 2016, Administrative segregation in U.S. prisons

10.1177/003288550208200304

Gendreau P., 2006, The handbook of forensic psychology, 3, 722

10.1177/0093854897024004002

10.1177/0306624X99432005

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195384642.003.0052

10.1007/978-1-4684-5652-3_12

10.1177/0093854806288038

Guo S., 2010, Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications

10.1177/0011128702239239

10.1177/0032885515605491

10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143833

Kapoor R., 2016, Mental health effects of restrictive housing

10.1086/652214

Labrecque R. M., 2016, Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions, 49

Labrecque R. M., 2013, Prisons and prison systems: Practices, types, and challenges, 57

10.1177/0306624X10378494

Latessa E. J., 2002, Federal Probation, 66, 43

Lowen M., 2012, Lifetime lockdown: How isolation conditions impact prisoner reentry

10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00021.x

10.1177/0011128705281747

10.1177/1049731509347850

10.1177/0011128700046004003

10.1111/1745-9133.12031

10.1177/0011128705279484

Miller W. R., 2013, Motivational interviewing: Helping people change

10.1037/law0000089

10.1007/s10940-015-9250-0

10.22215/etd/2003-05429

Pyrooz D. C., 2016, Gang affiliation and restrictive housing in U.S. Prisons

Riveland C., 1999, Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations

10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078

Rosenbaum P. R., 1985, American Statistician, 39, 33, 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383

Rossi P. H., 2004, Evaluation: A systematic approach

10.1016/j.avb.2012.05.005

10.1177/0022427812449470

Smith P., 2016, Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions, 331

10.1080/15564880802612581

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.001

10.1177/0011128709335151

10.1080/07418825.2012.723031

10.1177/1462474516642856

10.1177/0032885501081003005

United Nations, 2016, Seeing into solitary: A review of the laws and policies of certain nations regarding solitary confinement of detainees

U.S. Department of Justice, 2016, Report and recommendations concerning the use of restrictive housing

U.S. Senate Subcomittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, 2014, Reassessing solitary confinement II: The human rights, fiscal, and public safety consequences

10.1037/lhb0000058

10.1177/0032885599079003003

10.1177/0093854804272889

10.1177/0011128712470318

10.1080/0735648X.1991.9721424

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.002