Process evaluation of paediatric fellowship training programs at a University Hospital in Pakistan

BMC Medical Education
Sana Saeed1, Prem Chand1, Asna Sulaiman1, Imran Nisar1, Khadija Nuzhat Humayun1, Marib Ghulam Rasool Malik1, Fyezah Jehan1
1Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Fellowship programs offer training in a subspecialty focusing on distinct and advanced clinical/academic skills. This advanced postgraduate training allows physicians, who desire a more specialized practice, to further develop clinical, academic, research, and leadership/administrative skills. The Aga Khan University (AKU) is one of the few institutes offering paediatric sub-specialty training in Pakistan. We aimed to evaluate the current Paediatric fellowship programs at AKU. Methods Process evaluation of six paediatric fellowship programs (cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, critical care medicine, neonatology, and infectious disease) was conducted from September 2020 to April 2021 by senior clinicians and medical educationists. Evidence was collected through document review (using existing postgraduate medical education program information form), observation of teaching and learning support, and focused group discussions/interviews with program faculty and fellows were conducted. A review of the evaluation report was done as part of this study. This study received an exemption from the ethical review committee. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS (22.0) while the reports of discussion with fellows and friends underwent content analysis. Results All fellowship programs met the criteria for having a robust competency-based fellowship curriculum as per the institutional and national guidelines. Formative assessment in the form of continuous evaluation was found to be integrated into all the fellowship programs, however, most of the programs were found to lack a summative assessment plan. Fellows in training and program faculty were satisfied with the opportunities for mentorship, teaching, and learning. Thematic analysis of the discussion reports with faculty and fellows revealed three key themes including, program aspects translating into strengthening the training, gaps in the training program in delivering the expectations, and making ways to reach par excellence. Conclusions The process evaluation of paediatric fellowship programs provided an opportunity to holistically review the current strengths and quality of the training in individual programs along with the unmet needs of the trainees. This will help the program stakeholders to prioritize, align and allocate the resources to further enhance the quality of training and outcome of individual fellowship programs to ensure wider impacts at a regional, national, and international health system level.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Jerardi KE, Fisher E, Rassbach C, Maniscalco J, Blankenburg R, Chase L et al. Development of a Curricular Framework for Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellowships. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2017 Jul 1 [cited 2023 May 16];140(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28600448/.

Shah NH, Rhim HJH, Maniscalco J, Wilson K, Rassbach C. The current state of pediatric hospital medicine fellowships: A survey of program directors. J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2016 May 1 [cited 2023 May 16];11(5):324–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27042818/.

Touma NJ, Siemens DR. Attitudes and experiences of residents in pursuit of postgraduate fellowships: A national survey of Canadian trainees. Canadian Urological Association Journal [Internet]. 2014 Nov 1 [cited 2023 May 16];8(11–12):437. Available from: http://www.pmc/articles/PMC4277525/.

Bari A, Khan RA, Rathore AW. Postgraduate residents’ perception of the clinical learning environment; use of postgraduate hospital educational environment measure (PHEEM) in pakistani context. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 Mar;68(3):417–22.

Karpinski J, Ajjawi R, Moreau K. Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2017 Nov 21 [cited 2023 May 16];17(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29157228/.

Fitzgerald JEF, Giddings CEB, Khera G, Marron CD. Improving the future of surgical training and education: consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2023 May 16];10(8):389–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22449833/.

Ellis MC, Dhungel B, Weerasinghe R, Vetto JT, Deveney K. Trends in research time, fellowship training, and practice patterns among general surgery graduates. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2011 Mar 16 [cited 2023 May 16];68(4):309–12. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/21708369.

Biggs JSG. Postgraduate medical training in Pakistan: observations and recommendations. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008 Jan;18(1):58–63.

Frye AW, Hemmer PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach [Internet]. 2012 May [cited 2023 May 16];34(5). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22515309/.

Fishbain D, Danon YL, Nissanholz-Gannot R. Accreditation systems for Postgraduate Medical Education: a comparison of five countries. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2023 May 16];24(3):503–24. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30915642/.

Saaiq M, Khaleeq-Uz-Zaman. Residents’ perceptions of their working conditions during residency training at PIMS. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jun;20(6):400–4.

Norcini JJ. Indicators of the educational effectiveness of subspecialty training programs in internal medicine. Acad Med. 1995 Jun;70(6):512–6.

Gearhart SL, Wang MH, Gilson MM, Chen B, Kern DE. Teaching and assessing technical proficiency in surgical subspecialty fellowships. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(4):521–8.

Cataldi ML, Kelly-Hedrick M, Nanavati J, Chisolm MS, Anne LW. Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1920084.

Alam L, Khan J, Alam M, Faraid V, Ajmal F, Bahadur L. Residents’ perspective on the quality of postgraduate training programs in Pakistan - the good, the bad and the ugly. Pak J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Nov 1 [cited 2023 May 16];37(7). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34912401/.

Beauchamp G, Beauchamp GA. “Curriculum Theory: Meaning, Development, and Use,” Theory into Practice, 21 (Winter, 1982), 23–27. CIRS: Curriculum Inquiry and Related Studies from Educational Research: A Searchable Bibliography of Selected Studies [Internet]. 1982 Jan 1 [cited 2023 May 16]; Available from: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cirs/15.

Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach [Internet]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015 [cited 2023 May 16]. 5–24 p. Available from: https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/curriculum-development-for-medical-education-a-six-step-approach.

Long S, Rodriguez C, St-Onge C, Tellier PP, Torabi N, Young M. Factors affecting perceived credibility of assessment in medical education: A scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract [Internet]. 2022 Mar 1 [cited 2023 May 16];27(1):229–62. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34570298/.

Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, Hart D, Smee S, Touchie C et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach [Internet]. 2017 Jun 3 [cited 2023 May 16];39(6):609–16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28598746/.

Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach [Internet]. 2007 Nov [cited 2023 May 16];29(9):855–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18158655/.

Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach [Internet]. 2010 Aug [cited 2023 May 16];32(8):676–82. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20662580/.

Librizzi J, Winer JC, Banach L, Davis A. Perceived core competency achievements of fellowship and non-fellowship-trained early career pediatric hospitalists. J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2015 Jun 1 [cited 2023 May 16];10(6):373–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25755166/.

Baldwin CD, Szilagyi PG, Dreyer BP, Bell LM, Baker RC, Cheng TL et al. Strengthening the academic base of general pediatrics fellowship programs: a national program and curriculum development project. Ambul Pediatr [Internet]. 2007 Sep [cited 2023 May 16];7(5):340–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17870641/.

Gupta M, Ringer S, Tess A, Hansen A, Zupancic J. Developing a quality and safety curriculum for fellows: lessons learned from a neonatology fellowship program. Acad Pediatr [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2023 May 16];14(1):47–53. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24126046/.

Allan CK, Tannous P, DeWitt E, Farias M, Mansfield L, Ronai C et al. A Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship Boot Camp improves trainee confidence. Cardiol Young [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1 [cited 2023 May 16];26(8):1514–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28148335/.

Henricksen JW, Troy L, Siefkes H. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 May 16];21(10):E908–14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32195908/.

Williams DA, Porter ES, Lux IVSE, Grier HE, Mack JW, Orkin SH. Training program in cancer and blood diseases: Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, Children’s Hospital Boston/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Am J Hematol [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 May 16];85(10):793–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20730793/.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

BMC Medical Education

Thông tin tác giả