Problem statements in seven LIS journals

Blake, 1995, The perceived prestige of professional journals, 1995: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study, Education for Information, 14, 157, 10.3233/EFI-1996-14301

Buttlar, 1991, Analyzing the library periodical literature: Content and authorship, College & Research Libraries, 52, 38, 10.5860/crl_52_01_38

Esteibar, 1992, Ranking of journals in library and information science by research and teaching relatedness, The Serials Librarian, 23, 1, 10.1300/J123v23n01_01

Fisher, 1999, When write is wrong: Is all our professional literature on the same page?, Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 23, 61, 10.1016/S1464-9055(98)00126-2

Kohl, 1985, Ratings of journals by ARL library directors and deans of library and information science schools, College & Research Libraries, 46, 40, 10.5860/crl_46_01_40

Latour, 1987

Metoyer-Duran, 1994, Problem statements in research proposals and published research: A case study of researchers' viewpoints, Library & Information Science Research, 16, 105, 10.1016/0740-8188(94)90003-5

Mury, 1997, Writing for journals in library and information science: A report of a survey, The Serials Librarian, 31, 23, 10.1300/J123v31n04_03

Riggs, 1999, The human implications of technology's impact on the content of library science journals, Library Trends, 47, 788

Tjoumas, 1994, Research productivity and perceived prestige of professional journals: An examination of faculty specializing in public librarianship, The Serials Librarian, 25, 65, 10.1300/J123v25n01_06

Tjoumas, 1992, Faculty perceptions of the professional journal literature: Quo vadis?, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 33, 173, 10.2307/40323224