Preparing medical students for clinical practice: easing the transition

Perspectives on Medical Education - Tập 6 - Trang 277-280 - 2017
Alexandra R. Teagle1, Maria George2, Nicola Gainsborough1,2, Inam Haq1,2, Michael Okorie1,2
1Department of Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
2Brighton and Sussex Medical School. Brighton, UK

Tóm tắt

The transition from medical student to junior doctor is a challenge; the UK General Medical Council has issued guidance emphasizing the importance of adequate preparation of medical students for clinical practice. This study aimed to determine whether a junior doctor-led simulation-based course is an effective way of preparing final year medical students for practice as a junior doctor. We piloted a new ‘preparation for practice’ course for final year medical students prior to beginning as Foundation Year 1 (first year of practice) doctors. The course ran over three days and consisted of four simulated stations: ward round, prescribing, handover, and lessons learnt. Quantitative and qualitative feedback was obtained. A total of 120 students attended (40 on each day) and feedback was collected from 95 of them. Using a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), feedback was positive, with 99% and 96% rating 4 or 5 for the overall quality of the program and the relevance of the program content, respectively. A score of 5 was awarded by 67% of students for the ward round station; 58% for the handover station; 71% for the prescribing station, and 35% for the lessons learnt station. Following the prescribing station, students reported increased confidence in their prescribing. Preparation for practice courses and simulation are an effective and enjoyable way of easing the transition from medical student to junior doctor. Together with ‘on-the-job’ shadowing time, such programs can be used to improve students’ confidence, competence, and ultimately patient safety and quality of care.

Tài liệu tham khảo

General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: GMC; 2009. Goldacre M, Lambert I, Evans J, Turner G. PRHOs’ views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2003;326:1011–101. Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C. et al. How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. London: GMC; 2008. Jen MH, Bottle A, Majeed A, Bell D, Aylin P. Early in-hospital mortality following trainee doctors’ first day at work. PLOS ONE. 2009;4:e7103. Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, et al. An in depth investigation into cause of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study. London: GMC; 2009. http://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_Report_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors.pdf_28935150.pdf. Brown S, Bruce L, Clarke D, et al. General Medical Council, UK. The state of medical education and practice in the UK 2014. London: GMC; 2015. http://www.gmc-uk.org/SOMEP_2015.pdf_63501874.pdf. Tallentire VR, Smith SE, Wylde K, Cameron HS. Are medical students ready to face the challenges of Foundation training? Postgrad Med J. 2011;87:590–5. Evans DE, Roberts CM. Preparation for practice: how can medical schools better prepare PRHOs? Med Teach. 2006;6:549–52. Matheson C, Matheson D. How well prepared are medical students for their first year as doctors? The views of consultants and specialist registrars in two teaching hospitals. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:582–9.